IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8149-d1746483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralization or Cooperation? The Impact of “Government–Market” Green Governance Synergy on Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Fengyan Wang

    (School of Accounting, Shandong Women’s University, Jinan 250300, China)

  • Guomin Song

    (School of Accounting, Shandong Women’s University, Jinan 250300, China)

  • Lanlan Liu

    (School of Accounting, Shandong Women’s University, Jinan 250300, China)

Abstract

The partnership between government and market plays a crucial role in allocating green resources and fostering collaboration across organizations and departments. It integrates diverse knowledge types into the green innovation process and offers multifaceted insights into enterprises’ responses to green governance decisions. However, existing research predominantly examines the interplay among government green governance instruments, with insufficient exploration of the synergistic impacts of government and market in green governance. This study constructs a capacity coupling coefficient model to measure the synergy degree of “government–market” green governance (GMGG). Exploiting a balanced dynamic panel of 28,451 firm-year observations for 3807 Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2020, we estimate the causal effect of GMGG synergy on corporate green innovation (CGI) and further dissect the underlying transmission mechanisms as well as the moderating channels through which the effect operates. Empirical results reveal that the effect of GMGG synergy on CGI is subject to diminishing marginal returns, with the effect being significantly more pronounced for substantive green innovation. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that non-state-owned firms, eastern-region firms, and those in non-heavy-polluting industries respond with markedly greater sensitivity. Mechanism analysis further demonstrates that the extent of marketization serves as a mediating channel, whereas an elevated level of digital-economy development mitigates the impact of GMGG synergy on CGI. This study delineates the effective boundary of GMCC synergy in stimulating CGI, providing empirical benchmarks for the synergistic implementation of effective government and efficient market actions in green governance. It further corroborates the positive roles of marketization and the digital economy as novel governance instruments, thereby offering critical policy insights for the coordinated advancement of the “dual-carbon” goals and high-quality economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengyan Wang & Guomin Song & Lanlan Liu, 2025. "Decentralization or Cooperation? The Impact of “Government–Market” Green Governance Synergy on Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-31, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8149-:d:1746483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Aiting & Zhu, Yuhan & Wang, Wenpu, 2023. "Micro green technology innovation effects of green finance pilot policy—From the perspectives of action points and green value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Paul Lanoie & Michel Patry & Richard Lajeunesse, 2008. "Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 121-128, October.
    3. Qiao, Penghua & Liu, Siting & Fung, Hung-Gay & Wang, Chen, 2024. "Corporate green innovation in a digital economy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 870-883.
    4. Du, Kerui & Cheng, Yuanyuan & Yao, Xin, 2021. "Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Liu, Chen & Xiong, Mengxu, 2022. "Green finance reform and corporate innovation: Evidence from China✰," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    6. Jin Guo & Junhong Bai, 2019. "The Role of Public Participation in Environmental Governance: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & David Popp, 2017. "Erratum to: Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 441-444, October.
    8. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    9. Wang, Mingjin & Li, Yongyou & Chi, Fuwei, 2024. "Synergistically promoting enterprises to replace old growth drivers with new ones: The roles of market and government," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Hering, Laura & Poncet, Sandra, 2014. "Environmental policy and exports: Evidence from Chinese cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 296-318.
    11. Matthew A. Cole & Robert J. R. Elliott, 2003. "Do Environmental Regulations Influence Trade Patterns? Testing Old and New Trade Theories," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1163-1186, August.
    12. Zhao, Ziyi & Zhao, Yuhuan & Lv, Xin & Li, Xiaoping & Zheng, Lu & Fan, Shunan & Zuo, Sumin, 2024. "Environmental regulation and green innovation: Does state ownership matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Hutter, Gérard, 2016. "Collaborative governance and rare floods in urban regions – Dealing with uncertainty and surprise," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P2), pages 302-308.
    14. M A Cole & R J R Elliott, 2003. "Do Environmental Regulations Influence Trade Patterns? Testing New and Old Trade Theories," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0310, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    15. Weian Li & Jian Xu & Minna Zheng, 2018. "Green Governance: New Perspective from Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Liu, Jingjing & Zhao, Min & Wang, Yanbo, 2020. "Impacts of government subsidies and environmental regulations on green process innovation: A nonlinear approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Xin Li & Siwei Wang & Xue Lu & Fei Guo, 2023. "Quantity or quality? The effect of green finance on enterprise green technology innovation," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 1114-1140, November.
    18. Xu, Jiaqi & She, Shengxiang & Gao, Pengpeng & Sun, Yunpeng, 2023. "Role of green finance in resource efficiency and green economic growth," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Xie, Xuemei & Wang, Mengge, 2025. "Dark side of green subsidies: Do green subsidies to a focal firm crowd out peers’ green innovation?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Ming Yi & Yiqian Wang & Modan Yan & Lina Fu & Yao Zhang, 2020. "Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental Regulations, and Their Effect on Green Innovation Efficiency of Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    21. J. Leon Zhao & Shaokun Fan & Jiaqi Yan, 2016. "Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    22. Ying Lin & Quan-Jing Wang & Mei-Qi Zheng, 2024. "Nexus Among Digital Economy, Green Innovation, and Green Development: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 704-723, March.
    23. Yina Li & Yang Tong & Fei Ye & Jiajia Song, 2020. "The choice of the government green subsidy scheme: innovation subsidy vs. product subsidy," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(16), pages 4932-4946, July.
    24. Liao, Zhongju & Chen, Jie & Weng, Chen & Zhu, Cunbin, 2023. "The effects of external supervision on firm-level environmental innovation in China: Are they substantive or strategic?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 267-277.
    25. Ali Raza & Lu Hongliang & Zhu Yue & Tingyu Yang & Nian Wei, 2025. "Environmental regulations and eco-innovation as catalysts for green agricultural practices: insights from Pakistan–China agricultural cooperation," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-32, December.
    26. Ming Jia & Li Tong & P. V. Viswanath & Zhe Zhang, 2016. "Word Power: The Impact of Negative Media Coverage on Disciplining Corporate Pollution," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 437-458, October.
    27. Debao Dai & Yaodong Fan & Guangyu Wang & Jiaping Xie, 2022. "Digital Economy, R&D Investment, and Regional Green Innovation—Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    28. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    29. Xue, Qing & Liu, Xiangqin, 2024. "Can digital finance boost corporate green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    30. Yun Yang & Rong Wang & Junlan Tan & Jose Luis Calvo-Rolle, 2021. "Coupling Coordination and Prediction Research of Tourism Industry Development and Ecological Environment in China," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Kerner & Torben Klarl & Tobias Wendler, 2021. "Green Technologies, Environmental Policy and Regional Growth," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2104, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    2. Emilio Galdeano‐Gómez, 2010. "Exporting and Environmental Performance: A Firm‐level Productivity Analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 60-88, January.
    3. Somlanare Romuald KINDA & Pascale COMBES MOTEL & Jean-Louis COMBES, 2014. "Do Environmental Policies Hurt Trade Performance?," Working Papers 201404, CERDI.
    4. Shao, Yanmin & Li, Junlong, 2025. "When renewable energy technology products exports meet geopolitical risks: Can environmental policies sweeten the bitter pill of the trade?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Mai, Yirui & Yu, Kaidong & Zhang, Xuan, 2024. "Enhancing corporate carbon performance through green innovation and digital transformation: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    6. Wenqing Zhang & Jingrong Dong, 2023. "The Polarization Effect and Mechanism of China’s Green Finance Policy on Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Yuanshuo Xu & Jiahe Liang & Zhaoyingzi Dong & Minjun Shi, 2022. "Can Environmental Regulation Promote Green Innovation and Productivity? The Moderating Role of Government Interventions in Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Jichuan Sheng & Jing Xin & Weihai Zhou, 2023. "The impact of environmental regulations on corporate productivity via import behaviour: the case of China’s manufacturing corporations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3671-3697, April.
    9. Jing Xie & Qi Sun & Shaohong Wang & Xiaoping Li & Fei Fan, 2020. "Does Environmental Regulation Affect Export Quality? Theory and Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Bongsuk Sung & Myoung Shik Choi & Woo-Yong Song, 2019. "Exploring the Effects of Government Policies on Economic Performance: Evidence Using Panel Data for Korean Renewable Energy Technology Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Nicolli, Francesco & Vona, Francesco, 2012. "The Evolution of Renewable Energy Policy in OECD Countries: Aggregate Indicators and Determinants," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 130897, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    12. Muhammad, Tufail & Ni, Guohua & Chen, Zhenling & Mallek, Sabrine & Dudek, Marek & Mentel, Grzegorz, 2024. "Addressing resource curse: How mineral resources influence industrial structure dynamics of the BRI 57 oil-exporting countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Themann, Michael & Koch, Nicolas, 2021. "Catching up and falling behind: Cross-country evidence on the impact of the EU ETS on firm productivity," Ruhr Economic Papers 904, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    14. Hazem,Nada & Zaki,Chahir, 2025. "Environmental Stringency and Firms’ Participation in Global Value Chains : Evidence for MENA Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11161, The World Bank.
    15. Limin Du & Zheng Wang & Zhaohua Xiao, 2024. "Command thy blessing from above: vertically delegated carbon reduction targets and firm export performance in China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(6), pages 2643-2675, December.
    16. Garrone, Paola & Grilli, Luca, 2010. "Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An empirical investigation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5600-5613, October.
    17. Yuqing Ge & Yucai Hu & Shenggang Ren, 2020. "Environmental Regulation and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from China’s Eleventh and Twelfth Five-Year Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    18. He, Zhengxia & Cao, Changshuai & Kuai, Leyi & Zhou, Yanqing & Wang, Jianming, 2022. "Impact of policies on wind power innovation at different income levels: Regional differences in China based on dynamic panel estimation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Yutian Dou & Shuai Guan, 2023. "The Regionally Heterogeneous Impact of China’s Environmental Regulation on the Transformation and Upgrading of Its Industrial Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Francesco Nicolli & Francesco Vona, 2012. "The evolution of renewable energy policy in OECD countries: aggregate indicators and determinants," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03461247, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8149-:d:1746483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.