Author
Listed:
- Lanxiang Yang
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Haihe Education Area, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)
- Jiaxuan Pu
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Haihe Education Area, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)
- Shangzhou Ma
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Haihe Education Area, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)
- Pengkun Zhou
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Haihe Education Area, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)
- Yaran Wang
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Haihe Education Area, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)
- Yan Jiang
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Haihe Education Area, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)
Abstract
In order to explore the increase in the environmental benefits of solar ground source heat pump (SGSHP) systems, this study assesses the environmental benefits of SGSHPs through a comprehensive sustainability evaluation, integrating life cycle assessment, carbon emission analysis, and emergy analysis based on a real project in Tianjin (39.13° N, 117.2° E). By comparing an SGSHP with the conventional GSHP system, improvements in sustainability performance are quantified. The analysis reveals that the SGSHP system has a full-cycle EI 16 of 1.88 × 10 3 , which is 15% higher than the GSHP value of 1.63 × 10 3 . The SGSHP demonstrates a significant advantage in terms of carbon emissions at all stages, with an overall carbon emission of 31,671 kgCO 2 -eq, which is a reduction of about 9.4% compared to the 34,955 kgCO 2 -eq of the conventional GSHP system. The emergy conversion rate of SGSHP is 3.58 × 10 3 , which is 16.23% higher than that of GSHP. This shows that the system with the addition of solar energy is able to convert raw energy into useful heat or cooling energy more efficiently, reducing emergy wastage and making it operate more efficiently, with emergy saving and environmental advantages. The SGSHP system has an ESI value of 1.12, indicating that it is in a developmental or intermediate stage, with significant potential for sustainable economic contributions. In contrast, the GSHP system, with an ESI value of 0.98, demonstrates that it is not sustainable over the long term. By using a comprehensive environmental assessment framework and comparative data analysis, this study aims to better understand the SGSHP system’s performance in energy use, carbon emissions, and ecological impact, providing a scientific foundation for its wider adoption.
Suggested Citation
Lanxiang Yang & Jiaxuan Pu & Shangzhou Ma & Pengkun Zhou & Yaran Wang & Yan Jiang, 2025.
"Holistic Sustainability Assessment of Solar Ground Source Heat Pump Systems: Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Carbon Emissions and Emergy Analyses,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7767-:d:1736985
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7767-:d:1736985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.