IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v346y2023ics0306261923006827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for sustainable liquid and gaseous fuel production: A life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed, Badr A.
  • O'Boyle, Marnie
  • Li, Loretta Y.

Abstract

Biowastes are marked sources of global greenhouse gas emissions, however, locally accessible biowaste could be a sustainable source for biofuel production to generate clean energy. This study examined the environmental sustainability and economic feasibility of using co-pyrolysed sewage sludge (SS) with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for liquid and gaseous fuel production from the perspective of life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis. Wastewater-grown microalgae, sawdust, and wheat straw were selected as co-feed materials, and three mixing ratios (25, 50, and 75 wt%) of each feedstock with SS were examined. Wastewater-grown microalgae and SS were obtained from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), which were assumed to be near the pyrolysis plant facility, obviating the need for transportation. An Aspen simulation was used to estimate the amount of energy recovered from the pyrolysis as gaseous fuel for electricity and heat generation via gas turbines. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify future considerations for SS co-pyrolysis to make it a more environmentally and economically viable industrial process for producing liquid and gaseous fuels. The co-pyrolysis of SS with biomass reduced the overall environmental burden, with sawdust co-pyrolysis outperforming wheat straw and microalgal co-pyrolysis. All scenarios achieved a high net positive energy balance (from 2,595 to 6,323 kWh/1,000 kg bio-oil) and reduced global warming potential (GWP) (from −793 to −1,970 kg CO2 eq/1,000 kg bio-oil). Sawdust co-pyrolysis resulted in the highest GWP reduction (from −1,510 to −1,970 kg CO2 eq/1,000 kg bio-oil) and energy recovery (from 5,551 to 6,323 kWh/1,000 kg bio-oil). Energy recovery from gaseous fuel through gas turbine operation generated a process energy demand of 23 %–224 %. Sawdust co-pyrolysis exhibited the highest net present worth (NPW) of 6.16 million CAD. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the GWP and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential were affected by the transportation of sawdust and wheat straw. Overall, the co-pyrolysis of SS with both lignocellulosic and algal biomass is sustainable and economically feasible for producing liquid and gaseous fuels and treating hazardous waste originating from WWTPs, thereby facilitating environmental sustainability and a circular economy from the sale of pyrolysis products. Broader implication of this study is using effective catalysts to further strengthen the sustainability and increase the profitability of the co-pyrolysis process, which has not been yet investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed, Badr A. & O'Boyle, Marnie & Li, Loretta Y., 2023. "Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with lignocellulosic and algal biomass for sustainable liquid and gaseous fuel production: A life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:346:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923006827
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923006827
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arianna Callegari & Andrea Giuseppe Capodaglio, 2018. "Properties and Beneficial Uses of (Bio)Chars, with Special Attention to Products from Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Chen, Guanyi & Zhao, Liu & Qi, Yun, 2015. "Enhancing the productivity of microalgae cultivated in wastewater toward biofuel production: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 282-291.
    3. Campbell, Robert M. & Anderson, Nathaniel M. & Daugaard, Daren E. & Naughton, Helen T., 2018. "Financial viability of biofuel and biochar production from forest biomass in the face of market price volatility and uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 330-343.
    4. Wang, Xiaoliu & Yang, Meng & Zhu, Xiaonan & Zhu, Lingjun & Wang, Shurong, 2020. "Experimental study and life cycle assessment of CO2 methanation over biochar supported catalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Li, Jinhu & Ye, Xinhao & Burra, Kiran G. & Lu, Wei & Wang, Zhiwei & Liu, Xuan & Gupta, Ashwani K., 2023. "Synergistic effects during co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of polypropylene and polystyrene," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    6. Struhs, Ethan & Mirkouei, Amin & You, Yaqi & Mohajeri, Amir, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessments for nutrient-rich biochar production from cattle manure: A case study in Idaho, USA," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Chaudhary Awais Salman & Ch Bilal Omer, 2020. "Process Modelling and Simulation of Waste Gasification-Based Flexible Polygeneration Facilities for Power, Heat and Biofuels Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Shahbeig, Hossein & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies, evolved gas analysis, and techno-socio-economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Patel, Madhumita & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1486-1499.
    10. Abdulrasheed, A.A. & Jalil, A.A. & Triwahyono, S. & Zaini, M.A.A. & Gambo, Y. & Ibrahim, M., 2018. "Surface modification of activated carbon for adsorption of SO2 and NOX: A review of existing and emerging technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1067-1085.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Valerie & Slocum, Alexander, 2020. "Endemic Water and Storm Trash to energy via in-situ processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Jesse D. Young & Nathaniel M. Anderson & Helen T. Naughton, 2018. "Influence of Policy, Air Quality, and Local Attitudes toward Renewable Energy on the Adoption of Woody Biomass Heating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Mohammad Ghorbani & Petr Konvalina & Anna Walkiewicz & Reinhard W. Neugschwandtner & Marek Kopecký & Kazem Zamanian & Wei-Hsin Chen & Daniel Bucur, 2022. "Feasibility of Biochar Derived from Sewage Sludge to Promote Sustainable Agriculture and Mitigate GHG Emissions—A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Sibi G, 2018. "Bioenergy Production from Wastes by Microalgae as Sustainable Approach for Waste Management and to Reduce Resources Depletion," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 13(3), pages 77-80, July.
    5. Visva Bharati Barua & Mariya Munir, 2021. "A Review on Synchronous Microalgal Lipid Enhancement and Wastewater Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Giulio Allesina & Simone Pedrazzi, 2021. "Barriers to Success: A Technical Review on the Limits and Possible Future Roles of Small Scale Gasifiers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Sharma, Nishesh & Jaiswal, Krishna Kumar & Kumar, Vinod & Vlaskin, Mikhail S. & Nanda, Manisha & Rautela, Indra & Tomar, Mahipal Singh & Ahmad, Waseem, 2021. "Effect of catalyst and temperature on the quality and productivity of HTL bio-oil from microalgae: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 810-822.
    8. Alsulami, Radi A. & El-Sayed, Saad A. & Eltaher, Mohamed A. & Mohammad, Akram & Almitani, Khalid H. & Mostafa, Mohamed E., 2023. "Pyrolysis kinetics and thermal degradation characteristics of coffee, date seed, and prickly pear wastes and their blends," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Fanta Barry & Marie Sawadogo & Maïmouna Bologo (Traoré) & Igor W. K. Ouédraogo & Thomas Dogot, 2021. "Key Barriers to the Adoption of Biomass Gasification in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    10. Kumar, R. & Strezov, V., 2021. "Thermochemical production of bio-oil: A review of downstream processing technologies for bio-oil upgrading, production of hydrogen and high value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2023. "Optimizing utilization pathways for biomass to chemicals and energy by integrating emergy analysis and particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1448-1459.
    12. Mirkouei, Amin & Haapala, Karl R. & Sessions, John & Murthy, Ganti S., 2017. "A review and future directions in techno-economic modeling and optimization of upstream forest biomass to bio-oil supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 15-35.
    13. Bailera, Manuel & Lisbona, Pilar & Romeo, Luis M. & Espatolero, Sergio, 2017. "Power to Gas projects review: Lab, pilot and demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 292-312.
    14. Struhs, Ethan & Mirkouei, Amin & You, Yaqi & Mohajeri, Amir, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessments for nutrient-rich biochar production from cattle manure: A case study in Idaho, USA," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    15. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    16. Cerciello, Francesca & Coppola, Antonio & Lacovig, Paolo & Senneca, Osvalda & Salatino, Piero, 2021. "Characterization of surface-oxides on char under periodically changing oxidation/desorption conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Xuyao Zhang & Weimin Zhang & Dayu Xu, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Complex Forestry Enterprise: A Case Study of a Forest–Fiberboard Integrated Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Samy Yousef & Vidas Lekavičius & Nerijus Striūgas, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Masks Generated in the EU during COVID-19 Pandemic into Energy Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Wen, Yuming & Zaini, Ilman Nuran & Wang, Shule & Mu, Wangzhong & Jönsson, Pär Göran & Yang, Weihong, 2021. "Synergistic effect of the co-pyrolysis of cardboard and polyethylene: A kinetic and thermodynamic study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Niblick, Briana & Landis, Amy E., 2016. "Assessing renewable energy potential on United States marginal and contaminated sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 489-497.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:346:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923006827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.