IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7725-d1734161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Intellectual Property Reform Strategy, Manufacturing Craftsmanship Spirit, and Regional Energy Intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Liu

    (Faculty of Architecture and Art, Ningbo Polytechnic University, Ningbo 315800, China)

  • Juncheng Jia

    (Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Chenxuan Yu

    (Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Kun Lv

    (Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
    Merchants’ Guild Economics and Cultural Intelligent Computing Laboratory, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

Abstract

To systematically reveal the influence mechanisms and spatial effects of industrial intellectual property (IP) reform strategies and manufacturing craftsmanship spirit on regional energy intensity, this study aims to provide theoretical support and practical pathways for emerging market economies pursuing dual goals of energy efficiency governance and manufacturing transformation. Based on a “technology–culture synergistic innovation ecology” theoretical framework, the study deepens the understanding of energy intensity governance and introduces two spatial weight matrices—the economic distance matrix and the nested economic–geographic matrix—to uncover the spatial heterogeneity of policy and cultural effects. Using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2010 to 2022 (excluding Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan), we construct an index of manufacturing craftsmanship spirit (CSM) and its four dimensions—excellence in detail, persistent dedication, breakthrough orientation, and innovation inheritance—via the entropy method. Empirical analysis is conducted through Spatial Difference-in-Differences (SDID) and Double Machine Learning (DML) models. The results show that: (1) Industrial IP reform strategies significantly reduce local energy intensity through improved property rights definition and technology transaction mechanisms, but may increase energy intensity in economically proximate regions due to intensified technological competition. (2) All four dimensions of craftsmanship spirit indirectly mitigate regional energy intensity via distinct pathways, with particularly strong mediating effects from persistent dedication and innovation inheritance. In contrast, breakthrough orientation shows no significant impact, possibly due to limitations from the current stage of the technology lifecycle. (3) Spatial spillover effects are heterogeneous: under the nested economic–geographic matrix, IP reform strategies reduce neighboring regions’ energy intensity through synergistic effects, while under the economic distance matrix, competitive spillovers lead to an increase in adjacent energy intensity. Based on these findings, we propose the following: deepening IP reform strategies to build a technology–culture synergistic ecosystem; enhancing regional policy coordination to avoid technology lock-in; systematically cultivating the core of craftsmanship spirit; and establishing a dynamic incentive mechanism for breakthrough orientation. These measures can jointly drive systemic improvements in regional energy efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Liu & Juncheng Jia & Chenxuan Yu & Kun Lv, 2025. "Industrial Intellectual Property Reform Strategy, Manufacturing Craftsmanship Spirit, and Regional Energy Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-44, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7725-:d:1734161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7725/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7725/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaofeng Xu & Xiangyu Chen & Yi Xu & Tao Wang & Yifan Zhang, 2022. "Improving the Innovative Performance of Renewable Energy Enterprises in China: Effects of Subsidy Policy and Intellectual Property Legislation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Triguero, Ángela & Córcoles, David, 2013. "Understanding innovation: An analysis of persistence for Spanish manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 340-352.
    3. Gao, Chong & Lin, Junjie & Zeng, Jianfeng & Han, Fengwu, 2022. "Wind-photovoltaic co-generation prediction and energy scheduling of low-carbon complex regional integrated energy system with hydrogen industry chain based on copula-MILP," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    4. Liu, Xinmin & Sun, Wenqiang & Chen, Tiantian & Xu, Xiaoyuan & Huang, Tao, 2025. "Energy and environmental performance of iron and steel industry in real-time demand response: A case of hot rolling process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    5. Mohammed Alnour & Abdullah Önden & Mouad Hasseb & İsmail Önden & Mohd Ziaur Rehman & Miguel Angel Esquivias & Md. Emran Hossain, 2024. "The Asymmetric Role of Financial Commitments to Renewable Energy Projects, Public R&D Expenditure, and Energy Patents in Sustainable Development Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Liu, Jie & Siano, Pierluigi & Wu, Kejia, 2025. "Exploration of drivers for energy regulatory process reengineering in the digital era: The grounded theory approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    7. Delerue, Hélène, 2018. "Shadow of joint patents: Intellectual property rights sharing by SMEs in contractual R&D alliances," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 12-23.
    8. Peter L. Swan, 1970. "Market Structure and Technological Progress: The Influence of Monopoly on Product Innovation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 84(4), pages 627-638.
    9. Zhu, Guangfeng & Xia, Mingli, 2025. "Intellectual property protection and enterprise collaborative innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Dongli Chen & Qianxuan Huang, 2024. "The New Policy for Innovative Transformation in Regional Industrial Chains, the Conversion of New and Old Kinetic Energy, and Energy Poverty Alleviation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-37, May.
    11. Zhang, Hua & Li, Huajiao & Zheng, Xinxin & Liu, Haiping & Liu, Meng & Li, Baihua, 2025. "Dynamic evolution of the global copper trade dependency network structure and influence mechanism in the context of energy transition: An industrial chain perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    12. Sun, Qingyu & Li, Chuandong & Ma, Xiaowei, 2025. "Regional equity in the energy transition: Assessing the role of productivity gaps and technology selection," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    13. Furubotn, Eirik G., 2001. "The new institutional economics and the theory of the firm," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 133-153, June.
    14. Zhao, Qiuhan & Wu, Wei & Ge, Yuanqin & Xu, Jing, 2025. "Can intellectual property protection policy enhance enterprise innovation capability? Quasi-natural experimental study," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Xiangyu Wei & Guangtao Yu & Ying Li, 2023. "How Mentoring Cultivates the Craftsman Spirit of Protégés—A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Daphne W. Yiu & Chung–Ming Lau, 2008. "Corporate Entrepreneurship as Resource Capital Configuration in Emerging Market Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(1), pages 37-57, January.
    17. Dong, Xueqin & Dong, Dongdong & Huang, Lilong, 2025. "Enhancing corporate total factor productivity: The dual drivers of inclusive finance and technological progress," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Clercq, Dirk & Danis, Wade M. & Dakhli, Mourad, 2010. "The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 85-101, February.
    2. Jianghua Zhou & Rui Wu & Jizhen Li, 2019. "More ties the merrier? Different social ties and firm innovation performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 445-471, June.
    3. Bianchini, Stefano & Pellegrino, Gabriele, 2019. "Innovation persistence and employment dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1171-1186.
    4. Erika Raquel Badillo & Rosina Moreno, 2016. "Are Collaborative Agreements in Innovation Activities Persistent at the Firm Level? Empirical Evidence for the Spanish Case," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 49(1), pages 71-101, August.
    5. Michael Reksulak & William F. Shughart & Robert D. Tollison, 2008. "Innovation and the opportunity cost of monopoly," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(8), pages 619-627.
    6. Li, Fei & Wang, Dong & Guo, Hengdao & Liu, Zhan & Zhang, Jianhua & Lin, Zhifang, 2025. "Two-stage Distributionally robust optimization for hydrogen-IES participation in energy-carbon trading-frequency regulation ancillary services market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    7. Georgios Giotis & Evangelia Papadionysiou, 2022. "The Role of Managerial and Technological Innovations in the Tourism Industry: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Han, Fengwu & Zeng, Jianfeng & Lin, Junjie & Zhao, Yunlong & Gao, Chong, 2023. "A stochastic hierarchical optimization and revenue allocation approach for multi-regional integrated energy systems based on cooperative games," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    9. Ponta, Linda & Puliga, Gloria & Lazzarotti, Valentina & Manzini, Raffaella & Cincotti, Silvano, 2023. "To copatent or not to copatent: An agent-based model for firms facing this dilemma," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1349-1363.
    10. Li, Xing & Chen, Xi & Hou, Keqiang, 2024. "FDI technology spillovers in Chinese supplier-customer networks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Levy, Daniel & Snir, Avichai, 2013. "Shrinking Goods," EconStor Preprints 104552, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Christian Le Bas & Caroline Mothe & Thuc Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2011. "Technological innovation persistence : Literature survey and exploration of the role of organizational innovation," Working Papers 1132, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    13. Barge-Gil, Andres & D'Este, Pablo & Herrera, Liliana, 2018. "Corporate scientists as the triggers of transitions towards firms' exploration research strategies," MPRA Paper 85415, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Dario Guarascio & Mario Pianta & Francesco Bogliacino, 2017. "Export, R&D and New Products: A Model and a Test on European Industries," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner (ed.), Foundations of Economic Change, pages 393-432, Springer.
    15. Marcello Stanco & Concetta Nazzaro & Marco Lerro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2020. "Sustainable Collective Innovation in the Agri-Food Value Chain: The Case of the “Aureo” Wheat Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku & Ziska Fields, 2016. "The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Culture and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Banking Sector," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(2), pages 26-39.
    17. Tea Petrin & Dragana Radicic, 2023. "Instrument policy mix and firm size: is there complementarity between R&D subsidies and R&D tax credits?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 181-215, February.
    18. Ortiz, Rodrigo & Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Business perception of obstacles to innovate: Evidence from Chile with pseudo-panel data analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Richard Arend, 2013. "Ethics-focused dynamic capabilities: a small business perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Eirik G. Furubotn, 2009. "Heuristics, The Non‐Maximizing Firm And Efficient Allocation," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7725-:d:1734161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.