IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7286-d1722996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yuki Akiyama

    (Faculty of Architecture and Urban Design, Tokyo City University, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan)

  • Chiaki Mizutani Akiyama

    (Faculty of Engineering, Reitaku University, Chiba 277-0065, Japan)

  • Kotaro Mizutani

    (Urban Spatial Research Institute, Inc., Tokyo 151-0071, Japan)

  • Takahito Shimizu

    (Graduate School of Integrative Science and Engineering, Tokyo City University, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan)

Abstract

Understanding urban diversity is critical to inclusive planning for sustainable urban development. This study introduces a new Urban Diversity Index (UDI) based on global point-of-interest (POI) data for food-related establishments—defined here as facilities that offer food and beverage services, including various kinds of eating and drinking venues —covering 249 cities across 154 countries. The UDI integrates three components: Pielou’s Evenness Index ( J′ ) to capture the balance of establishment types, a Coverage Ratio ( C′ ) to measure global representativeness of establishment categories, and density ( ρ ′) to reflect spatial concentration. By applying concentric buffer analysis around city centers, we evaluate the spatial profiles of diversity in each city. Results show that while cities like London and Istanbul have similar index components, they exhibit significant differences in the spatial extent and pattern of high-diversity zones, reflecting their unique morphological and regulatory contexts. Furthermore, the analysis of “Peak Distance Buffer Zones”—areas where UDI remains above 95% of its maximum—reveals diverse urban forms, particularly in Asian megacities. Scatterplots of standardized UDI and peak distances identify distinct typologies of urban diversity structures. Notably, urban population size showed no significant correlation with UDI values. Overall, this study demonstrates the utility of globally standardized POI-based metrics in capturing the spatial heterogeneity of urban qualitative diversity and offers new insights into cross-city comparisons of urban complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuki Akiyama & Chiaki Mizutani Akiyama & Kotaro Mizutani & Takahito Shimizu, 2025. "Developing the Urban Diversity Index (UDI): A Global Comparison of Urban Qualitative Aspect and Its Implications for Sustainable Urban Planning Using POI Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-49, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7286-:d:1722996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward L. Glaeser & Scott Duke Kominers & Michael Luca & Nikhil Naik, 2018. "Big Data And Big Cities: The Promises And Limitations Of Improved Measures Of Urban Life," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 114-137, January.
    2. Vladimir Pavković & Darjan Karabašević & Jelena Jević & Goran Jević, 2021. "The Relationship between Cities’ Cultural Strength, Reputation, and Tourism Intensity: Empirical Evidence on a Sample of the Best-Reputable European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Christine G. Kiria Chege & Rosina Wanyama & Mark Lundy & Wilson Nguru & Matthias Jäger, 2021. "Does Retail Food Diversity in Urban Food Environments Influence Consumer Diets?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Marco Leonardi & Enrico Moretti, 2023. "The Agglomeration of Urban Amenities: Evidence from Milan Restaurants," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 141-157, June.
    5. Sahasranaman, Anand & Bettencourt, Luís M.A., 2021. "Life between the city and the village: Scaling analysis of service access in Indian urban slums," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Annekatrin Niebuhr, 2010. "Migration and innovation: Does cultural diversity matter for regional R&D activity?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(3), pages 563-585, August.
    7. Kyle Farrell, 2017. "The Rapid Urban Growth Triad: A New Conceptual Framework for Examining the Urban Transition in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Linglin Zhang & Pohsun Wang & Junling Zhou & Yulin Zhao, 2025. "Exploring the Spatial Distribution Mechanisms of Restaurants Across Different Urban Morphologies: A Macau Case Study Using Space Syntax and Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-32, March.
    9. Chen, Liangkan & Chen, Mingxing & Zhang, Xiaoping & Xian, Yue, 2024. "Evaluating inequality divides in urban development intensity between the Global North and South," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Abdulrazaq Zamil Menshid Al-saedi & Hoshyar Qadir Rasul, 2024. "New Roadmap toward Social Sustainability, from Physical Structures to Perceived Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Deirdre Pfeiffer & Scott Cloutier, 2016. "Planning for Happy Neighborhoods," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(3), pages 267-279, July.
    12. Rodriguez-Segura, Daniel & Schueler, Beth E., 2023. "Assessors influence results: Evidence on enumerator effects and educational impact evaluations," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Aisling J. Daly & Jan M. Baetens & Bernard De Baets, 2018. "Ecological Diversity: Measuring the Unmeasurable," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    14. Abdur Rehman Cheema & Abid Mehmood & Fazal Ali Khan, 2018. "Challenges of research in rural poverty: lessons from large field surveys," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 714-719, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crown, Daniel & Faggian, Alessandra & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2020. "Foreign-Born graduates and innovation: Evidence from an Australian skilled visa program✰,✰✰,★,★★," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(9).
    2. Meghamrita Chakraborty, 2023. "Linking Migration, Diversity and Regional Development in India," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 8(1), pages 55-72, January.
    3. Kominers, Scott Duke & Teytelboym, Alexander & Crawford, Vincent P, 2017. "An invitation to market design," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt3xp2110t, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    4. Malgorzata Wachowska & Magdalena Homa, 2020. "The Role of Ethnic Diversity in Stimulating Innovation Processes: Comparative Analysis of Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1157-1176.
    5. Pierpaolo Parrotta & Dario Pozzoli & Mariola Pytlikova, 2014. "The nexus between labor diversity and firm’s innovation," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 303-364, April.
    6. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.
    7. Wei, Hao & Yuan, Ran & Zhao, Laixun, 2020. "International talent inflow and R&D investment: Firm-level evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 32-42.
    8. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Qikang Zhong & Bo Li & Tian Dong, 2024. "Building sustainable slow communities: the impact of built environments on leisure-time physical activities in Shanghai," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Burhan Can Karahasan, 2014. "The Spatial Distribution Of New Firms:Can Peripheral Areas Escape From The Curse Of Remoteness?," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-28, DECEMBER.
    11. Paulo Ferreira & Éder J.A.L. Pereira & Hernane B.B. Pereira, 2020. "From Big Data to Econophysics and Its Use to Explain Complex Phenomena," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-10, July.
    12. Alessandra Venturini & Claudio Fassio & Fabio Montobbio, 2015. "How do Native and Migrant Workers Contribute to Innovation? A Study on France, Germany and the UK," Discussion Papers 30, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    13. Evan, Tomáš & Holý, Vladimír, 2023. "Cultural diversity and its impact on governance," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Licia Ferranna & Margherita Gerolimetto & Stefano Magrini, 2016. "The effect of immigration on convergence dynamics in the US," Working Papers 2016:27, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    15. Jennifer Hunt & Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle, 2010. "How Much Does Immigration Boost Innovation?," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 31-56, April.
    16. Haifeng Qian, 2013. "Diversity Versus Tolerance: The Social Drivers of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in US Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2718-2735, October.
    17. Nicola Fontana & Marco Manacorda & Gianluca Russo & Marco Tabellini, 2025. "Emigration and Long-Run Economic Development: Evidence from the Italian Mass Migration," Trinity Economics Papers tep1125, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    18. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Daniel Hardy, 2015. "Cultural Diversity and Entrepreneurship in England and Wales," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 392-411, February.
    19. Bryan Jones & Deborah Balk & Stefan Leyk, 2020. "Urban Change in the United States, 1990–2010: A Spatial Assessment of Administrative Reclassification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Luo, Kun & Lim, Edwin KiaYang & Qu, Wen & Zhang, Xuan, 2021. "Board cultural diversity, government intervention and corporate innovation effectiveness: Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7286-:d:1722996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.