IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6136-d1694593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Green Finance Pilot Policy Suppresses Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Yanqiu Zhu

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Ming Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Hongan Chen

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Jun Ma

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

Green finance is widely promoted as a tool for supporting low-carbon development, but its effects on innovation efficiency remain unclear. This study examines the impact of China’s Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones (GFRIPZ) on green innovation efficiency at the city level. Using the GFRIPZ policy as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a difference-in-differences approach to identify the causal effects of the policy and explore the underlying mechanisms and contextual moderators. The results indicate that the policy significantly reduces green innovation efficiency in pilot cities, with the negative impact being more pronounced in non-central cities, provincial capitals, and cities in western China. Mechanism analysis reveals two key pathways: increased environmental costs contribute to resource lock-in, and strategic shifts toward quantity-focused innovation reduce overall efficiency. Furthermore, we find that the institutional environment plays a critical role—market integration mitigates the policy’s adverse effects by improving resource allocation, while administrative environmental pressure intensifies distortions. These findings suggest that rigid green finance regulations may unintentionally suppress innovation performance. We propose that more flexible policy design, better cross-regional coordination, and refined local governance incentives are essential for aligning green finance tools with innovation-driven sustainability goals in emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanqiu Zhu & Ming Zhang & Hongan Chen & Jun Ma, 2025. "The Green Finance Pilot Policy Suppresses Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6136-:d:1694593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Xiqian & Lu, Yi & Wu, Mingqin & Yu, Linhui, 2016. "Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 73-85.
    2. Diego Restuccia & Richard Rogerson, 2017. "The Causes and Costs of Misallocation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 151-174, Summer.
    3. Berman, Eli & Bui, Linda T. M., 2001. "Environmental regulation and labor demand: evidence from the South Coast Air Basin," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 265-295, February.
    4. Popp, David, 2019. "Environmental Policy and Innovation: A Decade of Research," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(3-4), pages 265-337, September.
    5. Eli Berman & Linda T. M. Bui, 2001. "Environmental Regulation And Productivity: Evidence From Oil Refineries," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(3), pages 498-510, August.
    6. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.
    7. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Misato Sato, 2017. "The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(2), pages 183-206.
    8. Catherine Liston-Heyes & Anthony Heyes, 1999. "Corporate Lobbying, Regulatory Conduct and the Porter Hypothesis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 209-218, March.
    9. Ren, Xiaohang & Li, Wenqi & Li, Yiying, 2024. "Climate risk, digital transformation and corporate green innovation efficiency: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    10. David Popp, 2019. "Environmental policy and innovation: a decade of research," CESifo Working Paper Series 7544, CESifo.
    11. David Popp, 2019. "Environmental Policy and Innovation: A Decade of Research," NBER Working Papers 25631, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Zhong, Shen & Zhou, Zhicheng & Gao, Wei, 2025. "Impact of regional finance reform and innovation policies on green innovation in pilot cities: A quasi-natural experiment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 888-911.
    13. Rassier, Dylan G. & Earnhart, Dietrich, 2015. "Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 129-140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galeotti, Marzio & Salini, Silvia & Verdolini, Elena, 2020. "Measuring environmental policy stringency: Approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Liu, Hongxun & Gao, Jinfeng & Tian, Peng & Ma, Xiaoming & Meng, Guanfei & Yang, Jingnan & Li, Zhi, 2023. "The impact of environmental regulation on productivity with co-production of goods and bads," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Zhuanlan Sun & Demi Zhu, 2023. "Investigating environmental regulation effects on technological innovation: A meta-regression analysis," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(3), pages 463-492, May.
    4. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Antonio Musolesi, 2020. "Modeling Green Knowledge Production and Environmental Policies with Semiparametric Panel Data Regression models," SEEDS Working Papers 1420, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Sep 2020.
    5. Dogah, Kingsley E. & Jiang, Shang & Kuscevic, Casto Martín Montero & Lim, King Yoong, 2025. "Environmental policy and distance to firms: An analysis of publicly listed firms in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Gao, Yanyan & Zheng, Jianghuai, 2024. "The opposite innovation impacts of air and water pollution regulations: Evidence from the total emissions control policy in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Antonio Musolesi & Davide Golinelli & Massimiliano Mazzanti, 2025. "Modelling green knowledge production and environmental policies with semiparametric panel data regression models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 327-352, January.
    8. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Popova, Olga, 2024. "Environment vs. Economic Growth: Do Environmental Preferences Translate Into Support for Green Parties?," IZA Discussion Papers 17475, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Yan, Zheming & Zhou, Zicheng & Du, Kerui, 2023. "How does environmental regulatory stringency affect energy consumption? Evidence from Chinese firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Aliénor Cameron & Marc Baudry, 2023. "The case for carbon leakage and border adjustments: where do economists stand?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 25(3), pages 435-469, July.
    11. Guo, Mengmeng & Wang, Huixin & Kuai, Yicheng, 2023. "Environmental regulation and green innovation: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    12. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Antonio Musolesi, 2020. "A Semiparametric Analysis of Green Inventions and Environmental Policies," SEEDS Working Papers 0920, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Jun 2020.
    13. Huang, Jingchang & Zhao, Jing & Cao, June, 2021. "Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment—evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 154-174.
    14. Yuanshuo Xu & Jiahe Liang & Zhaoyingzi Dong & Minjun Shi, 2022. "Can Environmental Regulation Promote Green Innovation and Productivity? The Moderating Role of Government Interventions in Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Garsous, Grégoire & Worack, Stephan, 2022. "Technological expertise as a driver of environmental technology diffusion through trade: Evidence from the wind turbine manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    16. Huang, Youxing & Xu, Qi & Zhao, Yanping, 2021. "Short-run pain, long-run gain: Desulfurization investment and productivity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Yan, Zheming & Yu, Ying & Du, Kerui & Zhang, Ning, 2024. "How does environmental regulation promote green technology innovation? Evidence from China's total emission control policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    18. Wanli Zhang & Bin Zhu & Yongling Li & Dan Yan, 2024. "Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: a multi-country meta-analysis of the relationship between environmental regulation and green innovation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Xie, Yu & Wu, Desheng & Li, Xiaoyan & Tian, Suhua, 2023. "How does environmental regulation affect productivity? The role of corporate compliance strategies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    20. Lin, Fan & Xie, Danyang, 2024. "The Role of R&D for Climate Change Mitigation in China: a Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis," MPRA Paper 123556, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6136-:d:1694593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.