IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5701-d1683744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Ecotourism Decisions Through Dual-Process Theory: A Feature-Based Model from a Rural Region of Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Kübra Karaman

    (Faculty of Agricultural, Department of Landscape, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat 66100, Türkiye)

Abstract

Grounded in information processing theory, this study explores how ecotourism decisions were formed within the rural district of Akdağmadeni (Türkiye), integrating both heuristic and systematic decision-making processes. The research adopts a two-phase mixed-methods design: First, it employs a survey-based factorial analysis involving 383 participants to examine preferences for nature-based activities such as trekking, cycling, and cultural tourism. Second, it uses in-depth interviews to investigate participants’ strategic evaluations of local landscape and heritage assets. The results reveal that individuals flexibly switch between intuitive and analytical judgments based on contextual factors. Key decision drivers identified include alignment with local development, ecological integrity, and socioeconomic contribution. This dual-process insight is operationalized through a novel “feature-based evaluation model” that synthesizes landscape identity values with cognitive-perceptual cues, providing a new lens for assessing geoheritage-based tourism behavior. It was determined that participants used both intuitive and systematic information processing strategies in their decision-making processes, and factors such as harmony with nature, economic contribution, and local identity were found to affect preferences. The study draws attention to the need to develop sustainable tourism policies, raise public awareness, and support infrastructure investments, and provides a road map for the effective use of the region’s ecotourism potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Kübra Karaman, 2025. "Understanding Ecotourism Decisions Through Dual-Process Theory: A Feature-Based Model from a Rural Region of Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5701-:d:1683744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergiusz Pimenow & Olena Pimenowa & Piotr Prus & Aleksandra Niklas, 2025. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Sustainability of Regional Ecosystems: Current Challenges and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-42, May.
    2. Jennifer Kim Lian Chan & Kamarul Mizal Marzuki & Tini Maizura Mohtar, 2021. "Local Community Participation and Responsible Tourism Practices in Ecotourism Destination: A Case of Lower Kinabatangan, Sabah," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Burcu Soykök Ede & Murat Taş & Nilüfer Taş, 2025. "Sustainable Management of Rural Architectural Heritage Through Rural Tourism: Iznik (Turkey) Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Greenwald, Anthony G & Leavitt, Clark, 1984. "Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 581-592, June.
    5. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2009. "The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of Situation-Specific Experiential and Rational Cognition," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(1), pages 56-72, June.
    6. Petty, Richard E & Cacioppo, John T & Schumann, David, 1983. "Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 135-146, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    2. Rosbergen, Edward & Wedel, Michel & Pieters, Rik, 1997. "Analyzing visual attention tot repeated print advertising using scanpath theory," Research Report 97B32, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    3. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    4. Shalom Levy & Israel Nebenzahl, 2008. "The influence of product involvement on consumers’ interactive processes in interactive television," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 65-77, March.
    5. Khan Md Raziuddin Taufique & Chamhuri Siwar & Basri Talib & Farah Hasan Sarah & Norshamliza Chamhuri, 2014. "Synthesis of Constructs for Modeling Consumers’ Understanding and Perception of Eco-Labels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Chao-Ming Yang & Chia-Shun Shih, 2019. "Symbolic Consumption of Advertisements for Male Perfumes: Effects of Advertising Appeals and Product Involvement on Advertising Effectiveness," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 160-173, December.
    7. Schoormans, Jan P. L. & Robben, Henry S. J., 1997. "The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 18(2-3), pages 271-287, April.
    8. Krishnamurthy, Anup & Kumar, S. Ramesh, 2018. "Electronic word-of-mouth and the brand image: Exploring the moderating role of involvement through a consumer expectations lens," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 149-156.
    9. Michael Thomas, 2019. "Was Television Responsible for a New Generation of Smokers?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 689-707.
    10. Richa Agrawal & Vinay Patangia, 2005. "Need for Cognition as Determinant of Response to Rational and Emotional Ad Appeals," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 30(2), pages 139-149, May.
    11. Qiang Liu & Hongju Liu & Manohar Kalwani, 2020. "“See your doctor”: the impact of direct-to-consumer advertising on patients with different affliction levels," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 37-48, March.
    12. Chebat, Jean-Charles & Chebat, Claire Gelinas & Vaillant, Dominique, 2001. "Environmental background music and in-store selling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 115-123, November.
    13. Chandrashekaran, R., 2001. "The implications of individual differences in reference price utilization for designing effective price communications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 85-91, August.
    14. Candy Lim Chiu & Han-Chiang Ho, 2023. "Impact of Celebrity, Micro-Celebrity, and Virtual Influencers on Chinese Gen Z’s Purchase Intention Through Social Media," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    15. Behe, Bridget K. & Bae, Mikyeung & Huddleston, Patricia T. & Sage, Lynnell, 2015. "The effect of involvement on visual attention and product choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 10-21.
    16. Pornpitakpan, Chanthika, 2012. "A critical review of classical conditioning effects on consumer behavior," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 282-296.
    17. Mazursky, David & Ganzach, Yoav, 1998. "Does involvement moderate time-dependent biases in consumer multiattribute judgment?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 95-103, February.
    18. Peter Todd & Izak Benbasat, 1999. "Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 356-374, December.
    19. Bambauer-Sachse, Silke & Gierl, Heribert, 2009. "Can a positive mood counterbalance weak arguments in personal sales conversations?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 190-196.
    20. Debra Riley & Mark Anderson, 2015. "The Impact of Music Pleasantness and Fit on Advertising Attitudes for Low and High Involvement Consumers," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 90-96, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5701-:d:1683744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.