IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5695-d1683708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appraisal of Sustainable Retrofitting of Historical Settlements: Less than 60% Unexpected Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Mariangela Musolino

    (Geomatic Valuation University Laboratory (GeVaUL), Architecture and Design (dAeD) Department, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 25 Viale dell’Università, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Domenico Enrico Massimo

    (Geomatic Valuation University Laboratory (GeVaUL), Architecture and Design (dAeD) Department, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 25 Viale dell’Università, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Francesco Calabrò

    (Department of Energy, Environment, Material Engineering, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Graziella Road, 89131 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Pierfrancesco De Paola

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80 Vincenzo Tecchio Sq., 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Roberta Errigo

    (Geomatic Valuation University Laboratory (GeVaUL), Architecture and Design (dAeD) Department, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 25 Viale dell’Università, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Alessandro Malerba

    (Geomatic Valuation University Laboratory (GeVaUL), Architecture and Design (dAeD) Department, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 25 Viale dell’Università, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

Abstract

The present research aims to assess, from both ecological and economic perspectives, a strategic solution applied to the building sector that can contribute to mitigating the planetary tragedy of the overconsumption of global fossil energy (coal, oil, and gas) and, thus, climate change, along with its dramatic negative impacts on the planet, humanity, and the world’s economy. Buildings are the largest consumers of fossil fuel energy, significantly contributing to Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and, consequently, to climate change. Reducing their environmental impact is therefore crucial for achieving global sustainability goals. Existing buildings, mostly the historical ones, represent a significant part of the global building stocks, which, for the most part, consist of buildings built more than 70 years ago, which are aged, in a state of deterioration, and in need of intervention. Recovering, renovating, and redeveloping existing and historical buildings could be a formidable instrument for improving the energy quality of the international and national building stocks. When selecting the type of possible interventions to be applied, there are two choices: simple and unsustainable ordinary maintenance versus ecological retrofitting, i.e., a quality increase in the indoor environment and building energy savings using local bio-natural materials. The success of the “Ecological Retrofitting” Strategy strongly relies on its economic and financial sustainability; therefore, the goal of this research is to underline and demonstrate the economic and ecological benefits of the ecological transition at the building level through an integrated valuation applied in a case study, located in Southern Italy. First, in order to demonstrate the ecological benefits of the proposed strategy, the latter was tested through a new energy assessment tool in an updated BIM platform; subsequently, an economic valuation was conducted, clearly demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of the building’s ecological transition. The real-world experiment through the proposed case study achieved important results and reached the goals of the “Ecological Retrofitting” Strategy in existing (but not preserved) liberty-style constructions. First of all, a significant improvement in the buildings’ thermal performance was achieved after some targeted interventions, resulting in energy savings; most importantly, the economic feasibility of the proposed strategy was demonstrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariangela Musolino & Domenico Enrico Massimo & Francesco Calabrò & Pierfrancesco De Paola & Roberta Errigo & Alessandro Malerba, 2025. "Appraisal of Sustainable Retrofitting of Historical Settlements: Less than 60% Unexpected Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5695-:d:1683708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5695/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5695/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erin A. Hopkins, 2016. "An Exploration of Green Building Costs and Benefits: Searching for the Higher Ed Context," Journal of Real Estate Literature, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 67-84, January.
    2. Domenico Enrico Massimo & Vincenzo Del Giudice & Alessandro Malerba & Carlo Bernardo & Mariangela Musolino & Pierfrancesco De Paola, 2021. "Valuation of Ecological Retrofitting Technology in Existing Buildings: A Real-World Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-35, June.
    3. D'Agostino, D. & Parker, D. & Epifani, I. & Crawley, D. & Lawrie, L., 2022. "How will future climate impact the design and performance of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEBs)?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Ackerman, Frank & Stanton, Elizabeth A., 2012. "Climate risks and carbon prices: Revising the social cost of carbon," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 6, pages 1-25.
    5. Mia Ala-Juusela & Michael Short & Uzi Shvadron, 2014. "Tools to support sustainable entrepreneurship in energy positive neighbourhoods," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(2), pages 49-59, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chidebe Stanley Anyanwu & Oluwadayomi Akinsooto & Olorunshogo Benjamin Ogundipe & Samuel Ikemba, 2024. "Net-Zero Energy Buildings: A Path To Sustainable Living," Engineering Heritage Journal (GWK), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 107-113, October.
    2. Martin Zapf & Hermann Pengg & Christian Weindl, 2019. "How to Comply with the Paris Agreement Temperature Goal: Global Carbon Pricing According to Carbon Budgets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Franziska Piontek & Matthias Kalkuhl & Elmar Kriegler & Anselm Schultes & Marian Leimbach & Ottmar Edenhofer & Nico Bauer, 2019. "Economic Growth Effects of Alternative Climate Change Impact Channels in Economic Modeling," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(4), pages 1357-1385, August.
    4. Dietz, Simon, 2012. "The treatment of risk and uncertainty in the US social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 6, pages 1-12.
    5. Newbery, David, 2018. "Policies for decarbonizing a liberalized power sector," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-24.
    6. Gonçalves, M. & Figueiredo, A. & Almeida, R.M.S.F. & Vicente, R., 2024. "Dynamic façades in buildings: A systematic review across thermal comfort, energy efficiency and daylight performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. O'Mahony, Tadhg & Escardó-Serra, Paula & Dufour, Javier, 2018. "Revisiting ISEW Valuation Approaches: The Case of Spain Including the Costs of Energy Depletion and of Climate Change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 292-303.
    8. Harshwardhan Ketkale & Steven Simske, 2023. "A LifeCycle Analysis and Economic Cost Analysis of Corrugated Cardboard Box Reuse and Recycling in the United States," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Matteo Coronese & Francesco Lamperti & Francesca Chiaromonte & Andrea Roventini, 2018. "Natural Disaster Risk and the Distributional Dynamics of Damages," LEM Papers Series 2018/22, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    10. Stern, Nicholas, 2014. "Ethics, equity and the economics of climate change paper 2: economics and politics," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62704, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Rosalie Arendt & Till M. Bachmann & Masaharu Motoshita & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2020. "Comparison of Different Monetization Methods in LCA: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-39, December.
    12. Richard S.J. Tol, 2021. "Estimates of the social cost of carbon have not changed over time," Working Paper Series 0821, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    13. Delia D’Agostino & Danny Parker & Ilenia Epifani & Dru Crawley & Linda Lawrie, 2022. "Datasets on Energy Simulations of Standard and Optimized Buildings under Current and Future Weather Conditions across Europe," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Janda, Karel & Zilberman, David, 2015. "Selective reporting and the social cost of carbon," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 394-406.
    15. Pattison-Williams, John K. & Pomeroy, John W. & Badiou, Pascal & Gabor, Shane, 2018. "Wetlands, Flood Control and Ecosystem Services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A Case Study in Saskatchewan, Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 36-47.
    16. Harris, Jonathan M., 2013. "Green Keynesianism: Beyond Standard Growth Paradigms," Working Papers 179111, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    17. Monasterolo, Irene & Raberto, Marco, 2018. "The EIRIN Flow-of-funds Behavioural Model of Green Fiscal Policies and Green Sovereign Bonds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 228-243.
    18. Jenniches, Simon & Worrell, Ernst & Fumagalli, Elena, 2019. "Regional economic and environmental impacts of wind power developments: A case study of a German region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 499-514.
    19. Jean-Charles Hourcade & P.-R. Shukla & Christophe Cassen, 2015. "Climate policy architecture for the Cancun paradigm shift: building on the lessons from history," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 353-367, November.
    20. Juliet Schor, 2015. "Climate, Inequality, and the Need for Reframing Climate Policy," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 525-536, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5695-:d:1683708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.