IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5132-d1671109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy-Driven Dynamics in Sustainable Recycling: Evolutionary Dynamics on Multiple Networks with Case Insights from China

Author

Listed:
  • Hongjuan Zhang

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China
    Hubei Industrial Policy and Management Research Center, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China)

  • Haibing Liu

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China
    Hubei Industrial Policy and Management Research Center, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China)

  • Rongkai Chen

    (School of Applied Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

Abstract

Residents have substantial control over their daily lifestyles, and their behavior change has a considerable potential to reduce emissions. Understanding the adoption of sustainable lifestyles and recycling behaviors and how behavioral policies might shape this decision-making is critical to the transition to sustainable consumption patterns. This paper developed a multi-agent model on a multiplex complex network that integrates evolutionary game theory to simultaneously capture information transmission and behavioral interaction dynamics. In this model, residents determine decision utilities under the influence of internal and external factors and information transmission and then perform social interactions according to an evolutionary dynamics model. A real case of residents’ green express packaging purchase decisions in China was used for parameter initialization. Explorative simulations and scenario analyses were conducted to investigate the adoption patterns of sustainable lifestyles under different policy scenarios. Results indicate that the dynamic evolution of residents’ sustainable lifestyle decisions relies on social interactions and social networks. Government subsidies are effective in fostering sustainable decisions, but this effect is sensitive to the size of complex networks. Information campaigns and government subsidies have a significant marginal contribution to promoting sustainable lifestyles than green labeling schemes. Implementing subsidies and information campaigns as policy mixes can exert complementary effects and improve aggregate outcomes of policy packages.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongjuan Zhang & Haibing Liu & Rongkai Chen, 2025. "Policy-Driven Dynamics in Sustainable Recycling: Evolutionary Dynamics on Multiple Networks with Case Insights from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5132-:d:1671109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Huebner, Gesche & Shipworth, David & Hamilton, Ian & Chalabi, Zaid & Oreszczyn, Tadj, 2016. "Understanding electricity consumption: A comparative contribution of building factors, socio-demographics, appliances, behaviours and attitudes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 692-702.
    3. Cheng, Xiu & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong & Yang, Jiahui, 2019. "Does social interaction have an impact on residents’ sustainable lifestyle decisions? A multi-agent stimulation based on regret and game theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Wang, Yitong & Fan, Ruguo & Chen, Rongkai & Xie, Xiao & Ke, Can, 2025. "Exploring the coevolution dynamics of residents and recyclers in electric vehicle battery recycling decisions on the two-layer heterogeneous complex networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    5. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    6. Ganglmair-Wooliscroft, Alexandra & Wooliscroft, Ben, 2022. "An investigation of sustainable consumption behavior systems – Exploring personal and socio-structural characteristics in different national contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 161-173.
    7. Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(5), pages 1449-1475, December.
    8. Nuñez-Jimenez, Alejandro & Knoeri, Christof & Rottmann, Fabian & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2020. "The role of responsiveness in deployment policies: A quantitative, cross-country assessment using agent-based modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    9. Li, Jingjing & Jiao, Jianling & Tang, Yunshu, 2020. "Analysis of the impact of policies intervention on electric vehicles adoption considering information transmission—based on consumer network model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Stavrakas, Vassilis & Papadelis, Sotiris & Flamos, Alexandros, 2019. "An agent-based model to simulate technology adoption quantifying behavioural uncertainty of consumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Duncan J. Watts & Steven H. Strogatz, 1998. "Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6684), pages 440-442, June.
    12. Wilhemina Asare & Sampson Oduro Kwarteng & Emmanuel A. Donkor & Mizpah A.D. Rockson, 2020. "Recovery of Municipal Solid Waste Recyclables under Different Incentive Schemes in Tamale, Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Hammerstein, Peter & Selten, Reinhard, 1994. "Game theory and evolutionary biology," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 28, pages 929-993, Elsevier.
    14. Wang, Ge & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yan & Li, Hailong, 2018. "Policy simulation for promoting residential PV considering anecdotal information exchanges based on social network modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-10.
    15. Gao, Xingyu & Tian, Lixin, 2019. "Effects of awareness and policy on green behavior spreading in multiplex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 226-234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yitong & Fan, Ruguo & Du, Kang & Bao, Xuguang, 2023. "Exploring incentives to promote electric vehicles diffusion under subsidy abolition: An evolutionary analysis on multiplex consumer social networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Wang, Yitong & Fan, Ruguo & Chen, Rongkai & Xie, Xiao & Ke, Can, 2025. "Exploring the coevolution dynamics of residents and recyclers in electric vehicle battery recycling decisions on the two-layer heterogeneous complex networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    3. Lynne, Gary D., 2006. "Toward a dual motive metaeconomic theory," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 634-651, August.
    4. Lange, Florian & Brückner, Carolin & Kröger, Birte & Beller, Johannes & Eggert, Frank, 2014. "Wasting ways: Perceived distance to the recycling facilities predicts pro-environmental behavior," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 246-254.
    5. Zhang, Qi & Liu, Jiangfeng & Yang, Kexin & Liu, Boyu & Wang, Ge, 2022. "Market adoption simulation of electric vehicle based on social network model considering nudge policies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Schlüter, Maja & Baeza, Andres & Dressler, Gunnar & Frank, Karin & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Jager, Wander & Janssen, Marco A. & McAllister, Ryan R.J. & Müller, Birgit & Orach, Kirill & Schwarz, Nina & Wij, 2017. "A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 21-35.
    7. Noeldeke, Beatrice & Winter, Etti & Ntawuhiganayo, Elisée Bahati, 2022. "Representing human decision-making in agent-based simulation models: Agroforestry adoption in rural Rwanda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Zamri Ahmad & Haslindar Ibrahim & Jasman Tuyon, 2017. "Institutional investor behavioral biases: syntheses of theory and evidence," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 578-603, May.
    9. Knoeri, Christof & Binder, Claudia R. & Althaus, Hans-Joerg, 2011. "Decisions on recycling: Construction stakeholders’ decisions regarding recycled mineral construction materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 1039-1050.
    10. Yingqian Lin & Shuaikun Lu & Guanmao Yin & Baolong Yuan, 2025. "Policy Tools, Policy Perception, and Compliance with Urban Waste Sorting Policies: Evidence from 34 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg, 2021. "Entscheidungen, Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Immobilienwirtschaft: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Decisions, decision-making and decisions support systems in r," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, April.
    12. Robin Maximilian Stetzka & Stefan Winter, 2023. "How rational is gambling?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1432-1488, September.
    13. Michaël Lainé, 2014. "Vers une alternative au paradigme de la rationalité ? Victoires et déboires du programme spinoziste en économie," Post-Print hal-01335618, HAL.
    14. David Stadelmann & Benno Torgler, 2012. "Bounded Rationality and Voting Decisions Exploring a 160-Year Period," Working Papers 2012.70, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    15. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    16. Wang, Peijie, 2013. "Reverse shooting of exchange rates," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 71-76.
    17. Jan Trzaskowski, 2011. "Behavioural Economics, Neuroscience, and the Unfair Commercial Practises Directive," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 377-392, September.
    18. van Wee, Bert & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "COVID-19 and its long-term effects on activity participation and travel behaviour: A multiperspective view," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Benchimol, Jonathan & Bounader, Lahcen & Dotta, Mario, 2025. "Estimating Behavioral Inattention," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 236, pages 1-34.
    20. Torsten Trimborn & Philipp Otte & Simon Cramer & Maximilian Beikirch & Emma Pabich & Martin Frank, 2020. "SABCEMM: A Simulator for Agent-Based Computational Economic Market Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 707-744, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5132-:d:1671109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.