IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4682-d1659683.html

Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Space Syntax vs. Agent-Based Modelling in Exploring Urban Complexity and Crime Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Mara

    (Department of Energy, Systems Territory and Construction Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Valerio Cutini

    (Department of Energy, Systems Territory and Construction Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

Understanding the complexity of urban systems remains a significant challenge for researchers and practitioners in urban planning and governance. Cities function as multifaceted systems composed of interconnected subsystems with nonlinear interactions, making the design of effective interventions to enhance sustainability and liveability particularly challenging. Spatial modelling has gained prominence in recent decades, fuelled by advances in digital technologies and the advent of digital twins as decision support tools. To fully harness these innovations, it is essential to grasp their underlying principles, strengths, and limitations, and to select the most suitable modelling approach for specific applications. This paper examines two contrasting spatial modelling paradigms: top-down and bottom-up. Specifically, it focuses on Space Syntax and Agent-Based Modelling as representative tools of each approach, analyzing their potential applications in urban planning. This discussion delves into the effectiveness of the proposed methodologies in analyzing crime dynamics—selected as a representative application field—at the micro-urban scale. It highlights the insights each approach offers, emphasizing their contributions to understanding the spatial and environmental factors influencing crime patterns. Finally, this paper explores the potential for integrating these methodologies to develop hybrid models that capture both spatial structure and emergent behaviours, offering enhanced support for sustainable urban policies and planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Mara & Valerio Cutini, 2025. "Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Space Syntax vs. Agent-Based Modelling in Exploring Urban Complexity and Crime Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4682-:d:1659683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samia Sharmin & Md. Kamruzzaman, 2018. "Meta-analysis of the relationships between space syntax measures and pedestrian movement," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 524-550, July.
    2. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    3. Lisa Orii & Luis Alonso & Kent Larson, 2020. "Methodology for Establishing Well-Being Urban Indicators at the District Level to be Used on the CityScope Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Li, Wenliang & Zhou, Yuyu & Cetin, Kristen & Eom, Jiyong & Wang, Yu & Chen, Gang & Zhang, Xuesong, 2017. "Modeling urban building energy use: A review of modeling approaches and procedures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2445-2457.
    5. Ming Hu & Siavash Ghorbany, 2024. "Building Stock Models for Embodied Carbon Emissions—A Review of a Nascent Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Yucheng Guo & Jie Shi & Tong Guo & Fei Guo & Feng Lu & Lingqi Su, 2024. "Grey-Box Method for Urban Building Energy Modelling: Advancements and Potentials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Federico Mara & Valerio Cutini, 2024. "The Environmental Approach to Security: A Historical-Theoretical Literature Review on Space and Crime," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 525-547, August.
    8. Adinkrah, Julius & Kemausuor, Francis & Tutu Tchao, Eric & Nunoo-Mensah, Henry & Agbemenu, Andrew Selasi & Adu-Poku, Akwasi & Kponyo, Jerry John, 2025. "Artificial intelligence-based strategies for sustainable energy planning and electricity demand estimation: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Meng-Ting Tsai & Hung-Wen Chang, 2023. "Contribution of Accessibility to Urban Resilience and Evacuation Planning Using Spatial Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Adejimi Alli Adebayo & Paul Greenhalgh & Kevin Muldoon-Smith & Tunbosun Oyedokun, 2022. "Towards Attaining Sustainable Retail Property Locations: The Relationships between Supply, Demand, and Accessibility of Retail Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Dyer, Joel & Cannon, Patrick & Farmer, J. Doyne & Schmon, Sebastian M., 2024. "Black-box Bayesian inference for agent-based models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Claudia Yamu & Akkelies van Nes & Chiara Garau, 2021. "Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schumann, Hans-Heinrich & Haitao, He & Natapov, Asya & Quddus, Mohammed, 2025. "The influence of spatial configuration on e-scooter traffic flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Mohamed, Abdelbaseer A., 2025. "Using BERTopic modelling to map the evolution of space syntax research," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Askarizad, Reza & Lamíquiz Daudén, Patxi José & Garau, Chiara, 2024. "Exploring the role of configurational accessibility of alleyways on facilitating wayfinding transportation within the organic street network systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 179-194.
    4. Nir Kaplan & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Federico Mara & Diego Altafini & Valerio Cutini & Nick Malleson, 2025. "Simulation to forecast crime patterns: Comparing space syntax and agent-based models in exploring pedestrian movement and visibility," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(9), pages 2171-2195, November.
    6. Amr S. Abdallah & Hala Amin & Mohammed Abdelghany & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2025. "Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: a systematic review, integrated framework, and agenda for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 3067-3118, December.
    7. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    9. Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Dev, Dhairya, 2025. "Crude oil Price forecasting: Leveraging machine learning for global economic stability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    12. Samuel Wiese & Jagoda Kaszowska-Mojsa & Joel Dyer & Jose Moran & Marco Pangallo & Francois Lafond & John Muellbauer & Anisoara Calinescu & J. Doyne Farmer, 2024. "Forecasting Macroeconomic Dynamics using a Calibrated Data-Driven Agent-based Model," Papers 2409.18760, arXiv.org.
    13. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    14. Peng Dai & Song Han & Guannan Fu & Hui Fu & Yanjun Wang, 2023. "Optimization Path of Metro Commercial Passageway Based on Computational Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Hanna Lehtimäki & Kristina Leppälä & Nuppu Mielonen & Ville‐Veikko Piispanen & Kaisa Henttonen & Subhanjan Sengupta & Ida Parkkinen & Olena Liakh, 2026. "Sustainable Innovation Framework: A Review of Organization, Strategic Management, and Entrepreneurship Literature," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 34-64, January.
    17. Amal Almansour & Reem Alotaibi & Hajar Alharbi, 2022. "Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): an integrative review and implications for research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Solène Goy & François Maréchal & Donal Finn, 2020. "Data for Urban Scale Building Energy Modelling: Assessing Impacts and Overcoming Availability Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Pomerlyan, Evgeniya & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "Integration - Growth relationship: A literature review and future research agenda using a TCCM approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1106-1118.
    20. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4682-:d:1659683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.