IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11140-d1196034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization Path of Metro Commercial Passageway Based on Computational Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Dai

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Song Han

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Guannan Fu

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Hui Fu

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Yanjun Wang

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

Abstract

In this study, three key factors affecting the planning of metro commercial passageways are selected: the built environment of metro station, travel purposes of passenger flow and gate position of the station hall. The Pearson model, Logistic model and software simulation are combined to analyze passage passenger flow. In the study of metro passageways, most studies focus on the optimization of evacuation and transfer functions, with little research on metro commercial passageways. The purpose of this study is to improve the attractiveness of metro commercial passageways to passenger flow by improving the three key factors mentioned above, thereby improving the current situation of underground commerce. The analysis results show that in the built environment analysis, the four selected construction factors are highly correlated with the passenger flow, and the correlation degree is in the following order (from high to low): length of the passage, operation of the escalators, the distance from the passage exit to the bus stop and the passage width. In the passenger flow travel purpose analysis, based on the structure of passengers and the function of the surrounding land use, it can be divided into shopping, work and living purposes, and the result of model parameter comparison shows that “shopping trips” is the most significant purpose. According to the analysis of the location of the exit gates at the station concourse level, the passageway with a closer distance or linear pattern to the gate location is more attractive to the passenger flow.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Dai & Song Han & Guannan Fu & Hui Fu & Yanjun Wang, 2023. "Optimization Path of Metro Commercial Passageway Based on Computational Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11140-:d:1196034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11140/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11140/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Satya Sai Kumar Jillella & Annie Matan & Peter Newman, 2015. "Participatory Sustainability Approach to Value Capture-Based Urban Rail Financing in India through Deliberated Stakeholder Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Chen, Yanru & Yi, Bing & Jiang, Yangsheng & Sun, Jidong & Wahab, M.I.M., 2018. "Inter-arrival time distribution of passengers at service facilities in underground subway stations: A case study of the metropolitan city of Chengdu in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 227-251.
    3. Volchko, Yevheniya & Norrman, Jenny & Ericsson, Lars O. & Nilsson, Kristina L. & Markstedt, Anders & Öberg, Maria & Mossmark, Fredrik & Bobylev, Nikolai & Tengborg, Per, 2020. "Subsurface planning: Towards a common understanding of the subsurface as a multifunctional resource," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Melo, Patricia C. & Sobreira, Nuno & Goulart, Pedro, 2019. "Estimating the long-run metro demand elasticities for Lisbon: A time-varying approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 360-376.
    5. Hámor-Vidó, Mária & Hámor, Tamás & Czirok, Lili, 2021. "Underground space, the legal governance of a critical resource in circular economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Zheng, Siqi & Hu, Xiaoke & Wang, Jianghao & Wang, Rui, 2016. "Subways near the subway: Rail transit and neighborhood catering businesses in Beijing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 81-92.
    7. Peng Dai & Song Han & Xuxu Yang & Hui Fu & Yanjun Wang & Jianjun Liu, 2022. "Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Construction of Subway Stations in Residential Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Pagliara, Francesca & Russo, Lucia & Aria, Massimo, 2021. "Measuring retailers’ perceptions of new metro stations inauguration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Claudia Yamu & Akkelies van Nes & Chiara Garau, 2021. "Bill Hillier’s Legacy: Space Syntax—A Synopsis of Basic Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen & Meichen Fu, 2024. "A Review of Research on the Value Evaluation of Urban Underground Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Dionysia-Georgia Perperidou & Konstantinos Sigizis & Agkronilnta Chotza, 2021. "3D Underground Property Rights of Transportation Infrastructures: Case Study of Piraeus Metro Station, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    3. von der Tann, Loretta & Ritter, Stefan & Hale, Sarah & Langford, Jenny & Salazar, Sean, 2021. "From urban underground space (UUS) to sustainable underground urbanism (SUU): Shifting the focus in urban underground scholarship," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Yue Peng & Hui Qiu & Xinlu Wang, 2023. "The Influence of Spatial Functions on the Public Space System of Traditional Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Tamás Hámor & Katalin Bódis & Mária Hámor-Vidó, 2021. "The Legal Governance of Oil and Gas in Europe: An Indicator Analysis of the Implementation of the Hydrocarbons Directive," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Andres Dominguez & Hernán Enríquez Sierra & Nicolás Cuervo Ballesteros, 2021. "Regional Spatial Structure and Land Use: Evidence from Bogotá and 17 Municipalities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Ciyun Lin & Kang Wang & Dayong Wu & Bowen Gong, 2020. "Passenger Flow Prediction Based on Land Use around Metro Stations: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Longlong Zhang & Jingwen Yuan & Chulsoo Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Planning and Design of Ocean City Spatial Forms Based on Space Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Fenjie Long & Lang Shi, 2021. "Growth in surrounding consumer amenities: The economic externality of urban parks," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 1062-1079, June.
    10. Lucie Kubalíková & Aleš Bajer & Marie Balková & Karel Kirchner & Ivo Machar, 2022. "Geodiversity Action Plans as a Tool for Developing Sustainable Tourism and Environmental Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Karl‐Heinz Gaudry & Danilo Ibarra & Carla Carabajo & Katty Marin, 2022. "Interdependencies between spatial planning and the mining laissez‐passer in cities: Policy analysis of the case of Ecuador," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 258-278, April.
    12. Newman, Peter & Davies-Slate, Sebastian & Jones, Evan, 2018. "The Entrepreneur Rail Model: Funding urban rail through majority private investment in urban regeneration," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 19-28.
    13. Ying Liang & Wei Song & Xiaofeng Dong, 2021. "Evaluating the Space Use of Large Railway Hub Station Areas in Beijing toward Integrated Station-City Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Jyothi Chava & Peter Newman, 2016. "Stakeholder Deliberation on Developing Affordable Housing Strategies: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Transit-Oriented Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Tan, Ronghui & He, Qingsong & Zhou, Kehao & Xie, Peng, 2019. "The effect of new metro stations on local land use and housing prices: The case of Wuhan, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Yang, Jiawen & Su, Pinren & Cao, Jason, 2020. "On the importance of Shenzhen metro transit to land development and threshold effect," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-11.
    17. Ran Li & Liang Mao, 2022. "Spatial Characteristics of Suburban Villages Based on Spatial Syntax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Vejchodská, Eliška & Barreira, Ana Paula & Auziņš, Armands & Jürgenson, Evelin & Fowles, Steven & Maliene, Vida, 2022. "Bridging land value capture with land rent narratives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Elena Cantatore & Dario Esposito & Alberico Sonnessa, 2023. "Mapping the Multi-Vulnerabilities of Outdoor Places to Enhance the Resilience of Historic Urban Districts: The Case of the Apulian Region Exposed to Slow and Rapid-Onset Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    20. Yonggu Kim & Eul-Bum Lee, 2018. "A Probabilistic Alternative Approach to Optimal Project Profitability Based on the Value-at-Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11140-:d:1196034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.