IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p975-d314152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Economic Impacts of Sustainable Vertical Extension Methods for Existing Underground Spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Soo-yeon Seo

    (School of Architecture, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27389, Korea)

  • Byunghee Lee

    (Korea Construction Technology Consulting & Eng. Co., Ltd., Seoul 05548, Korea)

  • Jongsung Won

    (School of Architecture, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27389, Korea)

Abstract

Without demolishing an entire existing building, it is possible to sustainably expand its underground spaces to enhance the building’s functionality. However, there have been a few relevant studies exploring this option, and they did not consider the financial feasibilities of underground vertical extension methods. Therefore, this paper analyzes the economic impacts of three sustainable vertical extension methods for existing underground spaces. The extension methods were the (1) bottom-up, (2) normal top-down, and (3) top-down with multi-post downward (MPD) methods. In order to analyze and compare the economic impacts of the underground vertical extension methods, 24 illustrative examples were generated in this paper. Construction costs of the three sustainable vertical extension methods for existing underground spaces are calculated and compared. Those are based on the quantity of used materials in the construction phase and dismantled materials in the demolition phase, as well as unit costs of each material. In addition, the structural stabilities of the examples are analyzed using MIDAS Gen 2017. As the results, the top-down method with MPD was the lowest sustainable method for vertically expanding underground spaces compared to other two methods under the same condition. Moreover, the higher the number of underground floors of existing buildings and the greater the number of extended basement floors, the more economically advantageous was the top-down method with MPD. Considering their structural stabilities and economic impacts of the extension methods help practitioners to select appropriate construction techniques and reduce costs, risks, and the amount of generated construction and demolition waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Soo-yeon Seo & Byunghee Lee & Jongsung Won, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of Economic Impacts of Sustainable Vertical Extension Methods for Existing Underground Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:975-:d:314152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/975/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/975/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhilong Chen & Lichang Su & Cheng Zhang, 2016. "Research on the Synergy Degree of Aboveground and Underground Space along Urban Rail Transit from the Perspective of Urban Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Volchko, Yevheniya & Norrman, Jenny & Ericsson, Lars O. & Nilsson, Kristina L. & Markstedt, Anders & Öberg, Maria & Mossmark, Fredrik & Bobylev, Nikolai & Tengborg, Per, 2020. "Subsurface planning: Towards a common understanding of the subsurface as a multifunctional resource," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Xiaobin Yang & Zhilong Chen & Hao Cai & Linjian Ma, 2014. "A Framework for Assessment of the Influence of China’s Urban Underground Space Developments on the Urban Microclimate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-31, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uiseok Kim & Byungchan Min & Junghoon Kim & Hangseok Choi & Sangwoo Park, 2021. "Study on Increase in Stability of Floating and Underground Extension Method through Slab Pre-Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Daming Luo & Yan Wang & Shaohui Zhang & Ditao Niu, 2020. "Application of Fuzzy and Rough Sets to Environmental Zonation for Concrete Durability: A Case Study of Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Zenonas Turskis & Kęstutis Urbonas & Danutė Sližytė & Jurgis Medzvieckas & Rimantas Mackevičius & Vaidotas Šapalas, 2020. "A Novel Integrated Approach to Solve Industrial Ground Floor Design Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Junghoon Kim & Uiseok Kim & Byungchan Min & Hangseok Choi & Sangwoo Park, 2022. "Development of Expanded Steel Pipe Pile to Enhance Bearing Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Soo-Yeon Seo & Byunghee Lee & Jongsung Won, 2021. "Constructability Analyses of Vertical Extension Methods for Existing Underground Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Xiaoming Wang & Xudong Wang & You Dong & Chengshu Wang, 2020. "A Novel Construction Technology for Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge Considering Safety and Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Dai & Song Han & Guannan Fu & Hui Fu & Yanjun Wang, 2023. "Optimization Path of Metro Commercial Passageway Based on Computational Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Jian Peng & An Wang & Yanxu Liu & Weidong Liu, 2015. "Assessing the Atmospheric Oxygen Balance in a Region of Rapid Urbanization: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen & Meichen Fu, 2024. "A Review of Research on the Value Evaluation of Urban Underground Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Lucie Kubalíková & Aleš Bajer & Marie Balková & Karel Kirchner & Ivo Machar, 2022. "Geodiversity Action Plans as a Tool for Developing Sustainable Tourism and Environmental Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Xiaochao Su & Zhilong Chen & Xudong Zhao & Xiaobin Yang & Qilin Feng & Haizhou Tang, 2018. "Optimization Design of Underground Space Overburden Thickness in a Residential Area Concerning Outdoor Thermal Environment Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Cheng Peng & Chenxiao Ma & Yunhao Dong, 2023. "Unravelling the Formation Mechanism of Sustainable Underground Pedestrian Systems: Two Case Studies in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Xiaochao Su & Hao Cai & Zhilong Chen & Qilin Feng, 2017. "Influence of the Ground Greening Configuration on the Outdoor Thermal Environment in Residential Areas under Different Underground Space Overburden Thicknesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Stephanie Bricker & Jan Jelenek & Peter van der Keur & Francesco La Vigna & Sophie O’Connor & Grzegorz Ryzynski & Martin Smith & Jeroen Schokker & Guri Venvik, 2024. "Geoscience for Cities: Delivering Europe’s Sustainable Urban Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Hui Xu & Liudan Jiao & Shulin Chen & Milan Deng & Ningxin Shen, 2018. "An Innovative Approach to Determining High-Risk Nodes in a Complex Urban Rail Transit Station: A Perspective of Promoting Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Leilei Jiao & Fumin Deng & Xuedong Liang, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization Synergy Degree Measures—A Case Study in Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Soo-Yeon Seo & Byunghee Lee & Jongsung Won, 2021. "Constructability Analyses of Vertical Extension Methods for Existing Underground Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Hámor-Vidó, Mária & Hámor, Tamás & Czirok, Lili, 2021. "Underground space, the legal governance of a critical resource in circular economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Ruban, Dmitry A. & Mikhailenko, Anna V. & Yashalova, Natalia N., 2022. "Valuable geoheritage resources: Potential versus exploitation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Dionysia-Georgia Perperidou & Konstantinos Sigizis & Agkronilnta Chotza, 2021. "3D Underground Property Rights of Transportation Infrastructures: Case Study of Piraeus Metro Station, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    15. von der Tann, Loretta & Ritter, Stefan & Hale, Sarah & Langford, Jenny & Salazar, Sean, 2021. "From urban underground space (UUS) to sustainable underground urbanism (SUU): Shifting the focus in urban underground scholarship," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Karl‐Heinz Gaudry & Danilo Ibarra & Carla Carabajo & Katty Marin, 2022. "Interdependencies between spatial planning and the mining laissez‐passer in cities: Policy analysis of the case of Ecuador," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 258-278, April.
    17. Meishu Wang & Hui Gong, 2018. "Not-in-My-Backyard: Legislation Requirements and Economic Analysis for Developing Underground Wastewater Treatment Plant in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-10, October.
    18. Stefania Bonafoni & Giorgio Baldinelli & Paolo Verducci & Andrea Presciutti, 2017. "Remote Sensing Techniques for Urban Heating Analysis: A Case Study of Sustainable Construction at District Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, July.
    19. Frisk, Emrik Lundin & Volchko, Yevheniya & Sandström, Olof Taromi & Söderqvist, Tore & Ericsson, Lars O. & Mossmark, Fredrik & Lindhe, Andreas & Blom, Göran & Lång, Lars-Ove & Carlsson, Christel &, 2022. "The geosystem services concept – What is it and can it support subsurface planning?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    20. Khomenko, Alexei & Shikura, Alexey, 2020. "Nonlinear kinetics of transition between transport flow modes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 557(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:975-:d:314152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.