IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4532-d1656878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Analysis of Goals, Results, and Trends in Global Climate Policy Through the Lens of Regulatory Documents and Macroeconomics

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel Tsvetkov

    (Department of Organization and Management, Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg 199106, Russia)

  • Amina Andreichyk

    (Department of Organization and Management, Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg 199106, Russia)

Abstract

The issue of improving the effectiveness of international climate policy, one of the main goals of which is to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, poses a critical and acute challenge for the global economic system. At every COP conference and in every IPCC report, it is evident that current measures fall short. To address this gap, this study examines the structure and trends of global climate policy development through content analysis, PRISMA methodology, and correlation and regression analysis using censored Bayesian Tobit regression. The obtained results are supplemented with the LMDI (Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index) decomposition of the Kaya identity. The research covers 198 countries and 4241 documents spanning 1950 to 2023 that shape global climate policy. The results showed that (1) the success of climate goals varies depending on policy instruments, institutional conditions, and the time frame of analysis; (2) the greatest success in achieving climate targets was often observed in countries that adopted moderate, realistic, and institutionally supported targets; (3) in some cases, an overachievement of targets and GHG emissions reduction was a temporal observation or the result of economic decline; (4) in countries without officially declared targets, emissions also continued under similar growth trends, calling into question the effectiveness of current methods of setting up CO 2 emissions reduction targets. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the factors determining the effectiveness of climate policy. They highlight key barriers to achieving too ambitious emission reduction targets, which can lead to economic shocks and a subsequent increase in environmental impact. Ultimately, this research can contribute to the development of more realistic and effective decarbonization strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel Tsvetkov & Amina Andreichyk, 2025. "The Analysis of Goals, Results, and Trends in Global Climate Policy Through the Lens of Regulatory Documents and Macroeconomics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-37, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4532-:d:1656878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4532/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4532/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berner, Anne & Bruns, Stephan & Moneta, Alessio & Stern, David I., 2022. "Do energy efficiency improvements reduce energy use? Empirical evidence on the economy-wide rebound effect in Europe and the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Simon L. Lewis & Charlotte E. Wheeler & Edward T. A. Mitchard & Alexander Koch, 2019. "Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon," Nature, Nature, vol. 568(7750), pages 25-28, April.
    3. Ang, B.W., 2015. "LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 233-238.
    4. Ulvi Rzazade & Sergey Deryabin & Igor Temkin & Egor Kondratev & Alexander Ivannikov, 2023. "On the Issue of the Creation and Functioning of Energy Efficiency Management Systems for Technological Processes of Mining Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Aleksei Kazanin & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2023. "Strategic Priorities for Green Diversification of Oil and Gas Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & Afolabi Otitoju & Martha Ajibola Otitoju & Adekunle Oke, 2020. "The Impact of Energy Consumption and Economic Growth on Carbon Dioxide Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Hall, Charles A.S. & Lambert, Jessica G. & Balogh, Stephen B., 2014. "EROI of different fuels and the implications for society," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 141-152.
    8. Sokołowski, Maciej M. & Heffron, Raphael J., 2022. "Defining and conceptualising energy policy failure: The when, where, why, and how," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Valentin Morenov & Ekaterina Leusheva & George Buslaev & Ove T. Gudmestad, 2020. "System of Comprehensive Energy-Efficient Utilization of Associated Petroleum Gas with Reduced Carbon Footprint in the Field Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Lisa Palmer, 2021. "How trees and forests reduce risks from climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(5), pages 374-377, May.
    11. Yuriy Zhukovskiy & Anastasia Koshenkova & Valeriya Vorobeva & Daniil Rasputin & Roman Pozdnyakov, 2023. "Assessment of the Impact of Technological Development and Scenario Forecasting of the Sustainable Development of the Fuel and Energy Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Jonas Meckling & Bentley B. Allan, 2020. "The evolution of ideas in global climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(5), pages 434-438, May.
    13. Cécile A. J. Girardin & Stuart Jenkins & Nathalie Seddon & Myles Allen & Simon L. Lewis & Charlotte E. Wheeler & Bronson W. Griscom & Yadvinder Malhi, 2021. "Nature-based solutions can help cool the planet — if we act now," Nature, Nature, vol. 593(7858), pages 191-194, May.
    14. Elisa Di Febo & Eliana Angelini & Tu Le, 2023. "From Transition Risks to the Relationship between Carbon Emissions, Economic Growth, and Renewable Energy," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Nektarios Aslanidis & Susana Iranzo, 2009. "Environment and development: is there a Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 803-810.
    16. Angel Hsu & Niklas Höhne & Takeshi Kuramochi & Mark Roelfsema & Amy Weinfurter & Yihao Xie & Katharina Lütkehermöller & Sander Chan & Jan Corfee-Morlot & Philip Drost & Pedro Faria & Ann Gardiner & Da, 2019. "A research roadmap for quantifying non-state and subnational climate mitigation action," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 11-17, January.
    17. Mielke, Jahel & Steudle, Gesine A., 2018. "Green Investment and Coordination Failure: An Investors' Perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 88-95.
    18. Caio Waisman, 2024. "Bayesian estimation of finite mixtures of Tobit models," Papers 2411.09771, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Guanyu & Sugino, Makoto & Arimura, Toshi H. & Horie, Tetsuya, 2022. "Success and failure of the voluntary action plan: Disaggregated sector decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Mao, Qian & Ma, Xinyuan & Sun, Yunpeng, 2023. "Study of impacts of blockchain technology on renewable energy resource findings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 802-808.
    3. Aramendia, Emmanuel & Brockway, Paul E. & Pizzol, Massimo & Heun, Matthew K., 2021. "Moving from final to useful stage in energy-economy analysis: A critical assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Cai, Angzu & Wang, Leyi & Zhang, Yuhao & Wu, Haoran & Zhang, Huai & Guo, Ru & Wu, Jiang, 2025. "Uncovering the multiple socio-economic driving factors of carbon emissions in nine urban agglomerations of China based on machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    5. Zhu, Bangzhu & Su, Bin & Li, Yingzhu & Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2020. "Embodied energy and intensity in China’s (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2005-2015," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Yan Li & Yigang Wei & Hanxiao Xu & Huanwen Liu & Julien Chevallier, 2023. "Carbon monoxide and multi‐pollutants flow between China and India: A multiregional input–output model," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 2514-2537, August.
    7. Trotta, Gianluca, 2020. "Assessing energy efficiency improvements and related energy security and climate benefits in Finland: An ex post multi-sectoral decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Zhenkai Yang & Mei-Chih Wang & Tsangyao Chang & Wing-Keung Wong & Fangjhy Li, 2022. "Which Factors Determine CO 2 Emissions in China? Trade Openness, Financial Development, Coal Consumption, Economic Growth or Urbanization: Quantile Granger Causality Test," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Jonathan Dumas & Antoine Dubois & Paolo Thiran & Pierre Jacques & Francesco Contino & Bertrand Cornélusse & Gauthier Limpens, 2022. "The Energy Return on Investment of Whole-Energy Systems: Application to Belgium," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Rivera-Niquepa, Juan David & De Oliveira-De Jesus, Paulo M. & Yusta, Jose M., 2025. "Trend-based multi-period decomposition and decoupling methodology for energy-related carbon dioxide emissions: A case study of Portugal," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Pei-Ing Wu & Je-Liang Liou & Hung-Yi Chang, 2015. "Alternative exploration of EKC for $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 emissions: inclusion of meta-technical ratio in quantile regression model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 57-73, January.
    12. de Jong, Johan & Poorter, Lourens & de Jong, Wil & Bongers, Frans & Lohbeck, Madelon & Veenendaal, Elmar & Meave, Jorge A. & Jakovac, Catarina C. & Brancalion, Pedro H.S. & Amissah, Lucy & Martínez-Ra, 2025. "Dissecting forest transition: Contribution of mature forests, second-growth forests and tree plantations to tree cover dynamics in the tropics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Pellegris, Alban & Court, Victor, 2025. "The rise and fall of neoliberalism: Evidences from an ecological and regulationist analysis of France (1960–2020)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Florian Fizaine & Victor Court, 2016. "The energy-economic growth relationship: a new insight from the EROI perspective," Working Papers 1601, Chaire Economie du climat.
    15. Lukáš Režný & Vladimír Bureš, 2019. "Energy Transition Scenarios and Their Economic Impacts in the Extended Neoclassical Model of Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Abid Rashid Gill & Kuperan K. Viswanathan & Sallahuddin Hassan, 2017. "Is Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Relevant?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 156-165.
    17. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    18. Ross Astoria, 2016. "The legal configuration of hydrocarbon infrastructure," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-51, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Christidou, Maria & Panagiotidis, Theodore & Sharma, Abhijit, 2013. "On the stationarity of per capita carbon dioxide emissions over a century," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 918-925.
    20. Kristiana Dolge & Dagnija Blumberga, 2023. "Transitioning to Clean Energy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Renewable Electricity Generation in the EU-27," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4532-:d:1656878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.