IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4921-d416074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System of Comprehensive Energy-Efficient Utilization of Associated Petroleum Gas with Reduced Carbon Footprint in the Field Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin Morenov

    (Department of Oil and Gas, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Ekaterina Leusheva

    (Department of Oil and Gas, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • George Buslaev

    (Department of Oil and Gas, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Ove T. Gudmestad

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway)

Abstract

This paper considers the issue of associated petroleum gas utilization during hydrocarbon production in remote petroleum fields. Due to the depletion of conventional oil and gas deposits around the globe, production shifts to hard-to-recover resources, such as heavy and high-viscosity oil that requires a greater amount of energy to be recovered. At the same time, large quantities of associated petroleum gas are extracted along with the oil. The gas can be utilized as a fuel for power generation. However, even the application of combined power modes (combined heat and power and combined cooling heat and power) cannot guarantee full utilization of the associated petroleum gas. Analysis of the electrical and heat loads’ graphs of several oil fields revealed that the generated thermal energy could not always be fully used. To improve the efficiency of the fuel’s energy potential conversion, an energy system with a binary power generation cycle was developed, consisting of two power installations—a main gas microturbine and an auxiliary steam turbine unit designed to power the technological objects in accordance with the enterprise’s power load charts. To provide for the most complete utilization of associated petroleum gas, a gas-to-liquid system is introduced, which converts the rest of the gas into synthetic liquid hydrocarbons that are used at the field. Processing of gas into various products also lowers the carbon footprint of the petroleum production. Application of an energy system with a binary power generation cycle makes it possible to achieve an electrical efficiency up to 55%, at the same time maintaining high efficiency of consumers’ energy supply during the year. The utilization of the associated petroleum gas in the developed system can reach 100%.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin Morenov & Ekaterina Leusheva & George Buslaev & Ove T. Gudmestad, 2020. "System of Comprehensive Energy-Efficient Utilization of Associated Petroleum Gas with Reduced Carbon Footprint in the Field Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4921-:d:416074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yue Hu & Yachi Gao & Hui Lv & Gang Xu & Shijie Dong, 2018. "A New Integration System for Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants with CO 2 Capture and Heat Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Yaroslav Shklyarskiy & Aleksandr Skamyin & Iaroslav Vladimirov & Farit Gazizov, 2020. "Distortion Load Identification Based on the Application of Compensating Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Vonsée, Bram & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Liu, Wen, 2019. "Energy technology dependence - A value chain analysis of geothermal power in the EU," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 419-435.
    4. Jun Yan & Lianyong Feng & Alina Steblyanskaya & Anton Sokolov & Nataliya Iskritskaya, 2019. "Creating an Energy Analysis Concept for Oil and Gas Companies: The Case of the Yakutiya Company in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Ryszard Bartnik & Waldemar Skomudek & Zbigniew Buryn & Anna Hnydiuk-Stefan & Aleksandra Otawa, 2018. "Methodology and Continuous Time Mathematical Model to Select Optimum Power of Gas Turbine Set for Dual-Fuel Gas-Steam Combined Heat and Power Plant in Parallel System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radel Sultanbekov & Ilia Beloglazov & Shamil Islamov & Muk Chen Ong, 2021. "Exploring of the Incompatibility of Marine Residual Fuel: A Case Study Using Machine Learning Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Boris V. Malozyomov & Nikita V. Martyushev & Vladislav V. Kukartsev & Vadim S. Tynchenko & Vladimir V. Bukhtoyarov & Xiaogang Wu & Yadviga A. Tyncheko & Viktor A. Kukartsev, 2023. "Overview of Methods for Enhanced Oil Recovery from Conventional and Unconventional Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-48, June.
    3. Mikhail Dvoynikov & George Buslaev & Andrey Kunshin & Dmitry Sidorov & Andrzej Kraslawski & Margarita Budovskaya, 2021. "New Concepts of Hydrogen Production and Storage in Arctic Region," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Evgeny Solomin & Shanmuga Priya Selvanathan & Sudhakar Kumarasamy & Anton Kovalyov & Ramyashree Maddappa Srinivasa, 2021. "The Comparison of Solar-Powered Hydrogen Closed-Cycle System Capacities for Selected Locations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Valentin Morenov & Ekaterina Leusheva & Alexander Lavrik & Anna Lavrik & George Buslaev, 2022. "Gas-Fueled Binary Energy System with Low-Boiling Working Fluid for Enhanced Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Valentin Morenov, 2023. "Advances in Oil and Gas Production: A Viewpoint," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-3, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentin Morenov & Ekaterina Leusheva & Alexander Lavrik & Anna Lavrik & George Buslaev, 2022. "Gas-Fueled Binary Energy System with Low-Boiling Working Fluid for Enhanced Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Ryszard Bartnik & Zbigniew Buryn & Anna Hnydiuk-Stefan & Marcin Szega & Tomasz Popławski, 2020. "Power and Frequency Control in the National Power System of the 370 MW Coal Fired Unit Superstructured with a Gas Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-35, May.
    3. Simon P. Philbin, 2020. "Critical Analysis and Evaluation of the Technology Pathways for Carbon Capture and Utilization," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Aleksandr Skamyin & Yaroslav Shklyarskiy & Vasiliy Dobush & Iuliia Dobush, 2021. "Experimental Determination of Parameters of Nonlinear Electrical Load," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Nikolay Korolev & Anatoly Kozyaruk & Valentin Morenov, 2021. "Efficiency Increase of Energy Systems in Oil and Gas Industry by Evaluation of Electric Drive Lifecycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2020. "Energy and economic analysis of a small hybrid solar-geothermal trigeneration system: A dynamic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Hu, Hemin & Guo, Chaohong & Cai, Haofei & Jiang, Yuyan & Liang, Shiqiang & Guo, Yongxian, 2021. "Dynamic characteristics of the recuperator thermal performance in a S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Iulia Sorina Dan & Ionel Mugurel Jitea, 2023. "Barriers and Levers in the Development of the Value Chain of Organic Vegetables in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    9. N. I. Koteleva & N. A. Korolev & Y. L. Zhukovskiy, 2021. "Identification of the Technical Condition of Induction Motor Groups by the Total Energy Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Kazemi, Abolghasem & Moreno, Jovita & Iribarren, Diego, 2023. "Economic optimization and comparative environmental assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    12. Yaroslav Shklyarskiy & Iuliia Dobush & Miguel Jiménez Carrizosa & Vasiliy Dobush & Aleksandr Skamyin, 2021. "Method for Evaluation of the Utility’s and Consumers’ Contribution to the Current and Voltage Distortions at the PCC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Marko Milojević & Mariusz Urbański & Ivica Terzić & Valeriy Prasolov, 2020. "Impact of Non-Financial Factors on the Effectiveness of Audits in Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Zhao, Congyu & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Wang, Kun, 2023. "How does renewable energy encourage carbon unlocking? A global case for decarbonization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Ikäheimo, Jussi & Weiss, Robert & Kiviluoma, Juha & Pursiheimo, Esa & Lindroos, Tomi J., 2022. "Impact of power-to-gas on the cost and design of the future low-carbon urban energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    16. Anna Hnydiuk-Stefan & Aleksandra Otawa & Krzysztof Stefan & Dariusz Zmarzły, 2021. "Technical and Economic Analysis of Low-Emissions Modernization of Existing Heating Plants in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, November.
    17. Kazemi, Abolghasem & Moreno, Jovita & Iribarren, Diego, 2022. "Techno-economic comparison of optimized natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    18. Nataliia Fedorova & Pegah Aziziyanesfahani & Vojislav Jovicic & Ana Zbogar-Rasic & Muhammad Jehanzaib Khan & Antonio Delgado, 2019. "Investigation of the Concepts to Increase the Dew Point Temperature for Thermal Energy Recovery from Flue Gas, Using Aspen ®," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4921-:d:416074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.