IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p2087-d1350128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Pricing Strategy and Profit-Distribution Mechanism of Green and Low-Carbon Agricultural Products’ Traceability Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Jinde Jiang

    (Business School, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

  • Shuhua Jiang

    (Business School, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

  • Guoyin Xu

    (Business School, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

  • Jing Li

    (Dean’s Office, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

Abstract

In agricultural production, chemical fertilizers and pesticides are being used in large quantities; the residues of these substances have some negative impact on the quality of agricultural products and soil, and they produce a large amount of carbon emissions. Green agricultural products are popular for their low carbon, quality, and safety, and they flow from the production side to consumers through a traceable supply chain. Therefore, ensuring the reliable and stable operation of the traceable supply chain for green, low-carbon agricultural products is an important issue. In view of the difficulty of obtaining information in previous coordination mechanisms in multi-person cooperative games, this article proposes an optimal pricing decision and constructs a profit-distribution model based on an improved Raiffa value to make the profit-distribution mechanism more conducive to the stability and sustainable development of the supply chain, and empirical analysis was carried out. The empirical analysis shows the following: (1) The centralized decision-making selling price of green and low-carbon agricultural products based on the quantitative cost–benefit analysis and demand function can realize the optimal profit of the supply chain. (2) Using the improved Raiffa value, considering the investment cost and risk to allocate the optimal profit of centralized decision-making, optimizes the profit distribution of supply chain members and overcomes the problem of the difficulty in acquiring information in multi-player cooperative games. (3) For investment costs and risks, the corresponding profit-distribution adjustment value weight vector can be obtained using the AHP; for risks that are difficult to quantify, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and the risk-factor-based method can be used to determine the risk coefficient of each member of the supply chain. The optimized profit-distribution mechanism of supply chain members is more reasonable than decentralized decision-making, which has a significant reference for promoting the sustainable development of a traceable supply chain of green and low-carbon agricultural products.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinde Jiang & Shuhua Jiang & Guoyin Xu & Jing Li, 2024. "Research on Pricing Strategy and Profit-Distribution Mechanism of Green and Low-Carbon Agricultural Products’ Traceability Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2087-:d:1350128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2087/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2087/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diskin, A. & Koppel, M. & Samet, D., 2011. "Generalized Raiffa solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 452-458.
    2. Chong Wang & Xu Chen, 2013. "Fresh Produce Supply Chain Management Decisions with Circulation Loss and Options Contracts," Springer Books, in: Zhenji Zhang & Runtong Zhang & Juliang Zhang (ed.), Liss 2012, edition 127, pages 643-647, Springer.
    3. Yang, Huixiao & Chen, Wenbo, 2020. "Game modes and investment cost locations in radio-frequency identification (RFID) adoption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 883-896.
    4. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2020. "A simple game theoretical analysis for incentivizing multi-modal transportation in freight supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 152-165.
    5. Cai, Xiaoqiang & Chen, Jian & Xiao, Yongbo & Xu, Xiaolin & Yu, Gang, 2013. "Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 752-765.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Chao & Lv, Jingyu & Hou, Ping & Lu, Danrong, 2023. "Disclosing products’ freshness level as a non-contractible quality: Optimal logistics service contracts in the fresh products supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1085-1102.
    2. Mukunda Choudhury & Sujit Kumar De & Gour Chandra Mahata, 2023. "A pollution-sensitive multistage production-inventory model for deteriorating items considering expiration date under Stackelberg game approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11847-11884, October.
    3. Zhinan Li & Qinming Liu & Chunming Ye & Ming Dong & Yihan Zheng, 2022. "Achieving Resilience: Resilient Price and Quality Strategies of Fresh Food Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering the Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Wang, Kai & Ding, Peiqi & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2021. "Strategic credit sales to express retail under asymmetric default risk and stochastic market demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Dong, Ciwei & Huang, Qianzhi & Pan, Yuqing & Ng, Chi To & Liu, Renjun, 2023. "Logistics outsourcing: Effects of greenwashing and blockchain technology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Wang, Xiuli & Zhu, Qianqian & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "Subcontracting price schemes for order acceptance and scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Xiaoxu Chen & Peng Xu & Thomas Walker & Shengzhong Huang, 2019. "Pricing and Ordering Decisions in a Retailer Dominant Channel Involving a Third-Party Logistics Provider," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, July.
    8. Shen, Bin & Xu, Xiaoyan & Guo, Shu, 2019. "The impacts of logistics services on short life cycle products in a global supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 153-167.
    9. Zhang, Li-Hao & Liu, Chunxiao & Zhang, Cheng & Wang, Shanshan, 2023. "Upstream encroachment and downstream outsourcing in competing shipping supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Walter Trockel, 2015. "Axiomatization of the discrete Raiffa solution," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(1), pages 9-17, April.
    12. Pilar González-Torre & Jorge Coque, 2016. "How is a food bank managed? Different profiles in Spain," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(1), pages 89-100, March.
    13. Jingci Xie & Jianjian Liu & Xin Huo & Qingchun Meng & Mengyu Chu, 2021. "Fresh Food Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon and Freshness Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    14. Fang Qiu & Qifan Hu & Bing Xu, 2020. "Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Coordination and Volume Loss Reduction Based on Strategic Consumer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2021. "Step-by-step negotiations and utilitarianism," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(2), pages 433-445, June.
    16. Bouchery, Yann & Ghaffari, Asma & Jemai, Zied & Tan, Tarkan, 2017. "Impact of coordination on costs and carbon emissions for a two-echelon serial economic order quantity problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 520-533.
    17. Yang, Lei & Tang, Ruihong, 2019. "Comparisons of sales modes for a fresh product supply chain with freshness-keeping effort," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 425-448.
    18. Chong Wang & Xu Chen, 2017. "Option pricing and coordination in the fresh produce supply chain with portfolio contracts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 471-491, January.
    19. Wang, Jian & Zhu, Wenbo, 2023. "Analyzing the development of competition and cooperation among ocean carriers considering the impact of carbon tax policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Daryanto, Yosef & Wee, Hui Ming & Astanti, Ririn Diar, 2019. "Three-echelon supply chain model considering carbon emission and item deterioration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 368-383.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2087-:d:1350128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.