IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1268-d1332178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for Carbon Credits from Conservation Management: Price and Potential for Multi-Habitat Nature-Based Carbon Sequestration in Dorset, UK

Author

Listed:
  • Ellie-Anne Jones

    (Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Lisa Paige

    (Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Albany Smith

    (Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Annabelle Worth

    (Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Lois Betts

    (Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Richard Stafford

    (Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

Abstract

Carbon offsetting is currently a major tool in managing carbon emissions and informing sustainability plans of organisations in the drive to net-zero. This study aims to identify the offsetting potential of existing conservation schemes, and whether carbon offsetting credits could provide finance these conservation activities. The results from Dorset, in the UK, indicate that many existing conservation schemes in woodlands, heathlands, and grasslands cannot only enhance biodiversity but also capture significant amounts of carbon, and while habitats differ by region and country, the general results should be applicable elsewhere. We show that the cost per additional tonne of carbon sequestered as a result of conservation activities varies considerably between different conservation projects. On average, across the conservation projects we studied, the cost of this offsetting is GBP 80 per tonne CO 2 e sequestered and ranging between GBP 120 and GBP 0, depending on the project and whether existing biodiversity grants would be available. However, this figure was based on adapting and refining the existing conservation projects and did not involve expensive factors, such as purchase of land, which make the prices potentially unrealistic, especially in a Global North context. While the costs identified are higher than many offsetting schemes at present, it could present a useful option for those wishing to localise their offsetting. The concept is highly scalable and could remove significant amounts of carbon dioxide. Combining the approach with biodiversity credits or other credit schemes could make the higher costs more attractive to potential buyers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellie-Anne Jones & Lisa Paige & Albany Smith & Annabelle Worth & Lois Betts & Richard Stafford, 2024. "Potential for Carbon Credits from Conservation Management: Price and Potential for Multi-Habitat Nature-Based Carbon Sequestration in Dorset, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1268-:d:1332178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodemeier, Matthias, 2023. "Willingness to Pay for Carbon Mitigation: Field Evidence from the Market for Carbon Offsets," IZA Discussion Papers 15939, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Thales A. P. West & Sven Wunder & Erin O. Sills & Jan Borner & Sami W. Rifai & Alexandra N. Neidermeier & Andreas Kontoleon, 2023. "Action needed to make carbon offsets from tropical forest conservation work for climate change mitigation," Papers 2301.03354, arXiv.org.
    3. Forest Isbell & Dylan Craven & John Connolly & Michel Loreau & Bernhard Schmid & Carl Beierkuhnlein & T. Martijn Bezemer & Catherine Bonin & Helge Bruelheide & Enrica de Luca & Anne Ebeling & John N. , 2015. "Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes," Nature, Nature, vol. 526(7574), pages 574-577, October.
    4. Joseph William Bull & Isobel Taylor & Elizabeth Biggs & Henry M. J. Grub & Tom Yearley & Harriet Waters & E. J. Milner-Gulland, 2022. "Analysis: the biodiversity footprint of the University of Oxford," Nature, Nature, vol. 604(7906), pages 420-424, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ottmar Edenhofer & Max Franks & Matthias Kalkuhl & Artur Runge-Metzger, 2023. "On the Governance of Carbon Dioxide Removal – A Public Economics Perspective," CESifo Working Paper Series 10370, CESifo.
    2. T. B. White & S. O. Petrovan & L. A. Bennun & T. Butterworth & A. P. Christie & H. Downey & S. B. Hunter & B. R. Jobson & S. O. S. E. zu Ermgassen & W. J. Sutherland, 2023. "Principles for using evidence to improve biodiversity impact mitigation by business," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4719-4733, November.
    3. Xiaoliang Shi & Fei Chen & Hao Ding & Mengqi Shi & Yi Li, 2022. "Assessing Vegetation Ecosystem Resistance to Drought in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Andreas A. Haupt & Nicole Immorlica & Brendan Lucier, 2023. "Certification Design for a Competitive Market," Papers 2301.13449, arXiv.org.
    5. Augeraud-Véron, Emmanuelle & Fabbri, Giorgio & Schubert, Katheline, 2021. "Volatility-reducing biodiversity conservation under strategic interactions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Seixas, Hugo Tameirão & Brunsell, Nathaniel A. & Moraes, Elisabete Caria & de Oliveira, Gabriel & Mataveli, Guilherme, 2022. "Exploring the ecosystem resilience concept with land surface model scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    7. Ping, Jiaye & Zhou, Jian & Huang, Kun & Sun, Xiaoying & Sun, Huanfa & Xia, Jianyang, 2021. "Modeling the typhoon disturbance effect on ecosystem carbon storage dynamics in a subtropical forest of China's coastal region," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    8. Imran Khaliq & Christian Rixen & Florian Zellweger & Catherine H. Graham & Martin M. Gossner & Ian R. McFadden & Laura Antão & Jakob Brodersen & Shyamolina Ghosh & Francesco Pomati & Ole Seehausen & T, 2024. "Warming underpins community turnover in temperate freshwater and terrestrial communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Davide D. Pace & Taisuke Imai & Peter Schwardmann & Joël J. van der Weele, 2023. "Uncertainty about Carbon Impact and the Willingness to Avoid CO2 Emissions," ISER Discussion Paper 1227, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    10. Rinella, Matthew J. & James, Jeremy J., 2017. "A modelling framework for improving plant establishment during ecological restoration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 177-183.
    11. Donohue, Ian & Coscieme, Luca & Gellner, Gabriel & Yang, Qiang & Jackson, Andrew L. & Kubiszewski, Ida & Costanza, Robert & McCann, Kevin S., 2023. "Accelerated economic recovery in countries powered by renewables," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    12. Han Zhang & Lin Wang, 2022. "Species Diversity and Carbon Sequestration Oxygen Release Capacity of Dominant Communities in the Hancang River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Qingqing Chen & Shaopeng Wang & Elizabeth T. Borer & Jonathan D. Bakker & Eric W. Seabloom & W. Stanley Harpole & Nico Eisenhauer & Ylva Lekberg & Yvonne M. Buckley & Jane A. Catford & Christiane Rosc, 2023. "Multidimensional responses of grassland stability to eutrophication," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Rodemeier, Matthias & Löschel, Andreas, 2023. "Information Nudges, Subsidies, and Crowding Out of Attention: Field Evidence from Energy Efficiency Investments," IZA Discussion Papers 16141, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Jie Lu & Fengqin Yan, 2023. "The Divergent Resistance and Resilience of Forest and Grassland Ecosystems to Extreme Summer Drought in Carbon Sequestration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Wirth, Stephen Björn & Taubert, Franziska & Tietjen, Britta & Müller, Christoph & Rolinski, Susanne, 2021. "Do details matter? Disentangling the processes related to plant species interactions in two grassland models of different complexity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
    17. Yu Ding & Xiuxian Song & Xihua Cao & Liyan He & Shanshan Liu & Zhiming Yu, 2021. "Healthier Communities of Phytoplankton and Bacteria Achieved via the Application of Modified Clay in Shrimp Aquaculture Ponds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Davide Pace & Taisuke Imai & Peter Schwardmann & Joel van der Weele, 2023. "Uncertainty about Carbon Impact and the Willingness to Avoid CO2 Emissions," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 470, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    19. Gaowen Yang & Masahiro Ryo & Julien Roy & Daniel R. Lammel & Max-Bernhard Ballhausen & Xin Jing & Xuefeng Zhu & Matthias C. Rillig, 2022. "Multiple anthropogenic pressures eliminate the effects of soil microbial diversity on ecosystem functions in experimental microcosms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    20. Martin, Guillaume & Barth, Kerstin & Benoit, Marc & Brock, Christopher & Destruel, Marie & Dumont, Bertrand & Grillot, Myriam & Hübner, Severin & Magne, Marie-Angélina & Moerman, Marie & Mosnier, Clai, 2020. "Potential of multi-species livestock farming to improve the sustainability of livestock farms: A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1268-:d:1332178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.