Sensitivity of long-term productivity estimations in mixed forests to uncertain parameters related to fine roots

Forest growth models are increasingly being used in forestry and ecology research as predictive tools to help developing practical guidelines and to improve understanding of the drivers of forest ecosystem functioning. Models are usually calibrated using parameters directly obtained or estimated from empirical field observation, and hence are subject to uncertainty. Thus, output accuracy depends on input parameters precision and on how influential is each parameter on model behaviour. Hence, it is important to analyse parameter-related uncertainty and its effects on model outputs. This can be done by performing sensitivity analyses, which allow to explore the influence of one or several calibration parameters on model outputs. As studies on tree root parameters are particularly scarce, the aim of the present work was to evaluate the influence of parameters related to fine roots on estimations of long-term forest growth patterns in pure and mixed forests, using FORECAST (a hybrid forest growth model) as a virtual lab. The fine root parameters assessed were biomass, turnover rate, and nitrogen content. The analysis was performed by simulating monospecific stands of two contrasting species (Pinus sylvestris L. and Fagus sylvatica L.), and mixed stands formed by both species. In all cases, FORECAST showed good capability to contain uncertainty propagation during the first and middle stages of stand development (<40 years). After that moment, model output uncertainty steadily increased, but it reached different maximum uncertainty levels depending on stand type. Simulations of the less nutrient demanding P. sylvestris manifested very little sensitivity when growing in monospecific stands. However, F. sylvatica monospecific stands showed intermediate sensitivity, but significant species interactions occurred in mixed stands that determined the biggest impact detected of uncertainty related to fine root parameters over model outputs. All things considered, FORECAST displayed an interesting capability to capture some of the interspecific interactions that are key in mixed forests functioning. Our results suggest an acceptable model performance under uncertain parameterization but also caution against expecting accurate quantitative estimations of forest growth, especially when considering long-term scenarios in complex mixed stands.