IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3269-d1629463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Municipal Solid Waste Management in Hangzhou: Analyzing Public Willingness to Pay for Circular Economy Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahao He

    (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    College of Art and Archaeology, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Shuwen Wu

    (Department of Life and Environment Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Japan)

  • Huifang Yu

    (College of Art and Archaeology, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Chun Bao

    (College of Arts, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

Abstract

Effective municipal solid waste (MSW) management is crucial for urban sustainability, especially in fast-growing cities, like Hangzhou, China. This study examines residents’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the following five key MSW measures: differentiated waste charging, smart recycling points, on-site organic waste recovery, volunteer-based waste sorting supervision, and a community self-governance fund. Based on a survey of 521 residents across 13 districts, we use logistic and interval regression models to identify factors influencing WTP and payment amounts. Key findings include the following: Higher-income and more educated residents prefer cost-efficient, technology-driven solutions, like smart recycling and differentiated charging. Newcomers (≤5 years of residence) show higher WTP and greater sensitivity to environmental information, highlighting the need for targeted outreach. Providing explicit environmental benefits (e.g., waste reduction, increased recycling) significantly boosts WTP rates and payment levels. Community characteristics matter—residents in high-density areas favor waste charging, while those in older neighborhoods support volunteer programs and self-governance funds. Policy implications center on targeted outreach, transparent fee structures, and incentive programs to foster public trust and enhance participation. Although MSW management in Hangzhou remains predominantly government-led, select collaboration with private enterprises (e.g., in specialized recycling services) may offer additional efficiency gains. By aligning these measures with localized preferences and demographic patterns, Hangzhou—and other quickly urbanizing regions—can develop robust and inclusive MSW systems that contribute to broader sustainable development objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahao He & Shuwen Wu & Huifang Yu & Chun Bao, 2025. "Optimizing Municipal Solid Waste Management in Hangzhou: Analyzing Public Willingness to Pay for Circular Economy Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-36, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3269-:d:1629463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fairbrother, Malcolm, 2019. "When Will People Pay to Pollute? Environmental Taxes, Political Trust and Experimental Evidence from Britain," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 661-682, April.
    2. Yanli Wang & Chao Yang & Yanchi Zhang & Xiaoyong Hu, 2021. "Socioeconomic Status and Prosocial Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Community Identity and Perceived Control," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Graham-Rowe, Ella & Jessop, Donna C. & Sparks, Paul, 2014. "Identifying motivations and barriers to minimising household food waste," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 15-23.
    4. Diederich, Johannes & Epperson, Raphael & Goeschl, Timo, 2021. "How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money," Working Papers 0698, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    5. Rodemeier, Matthias, 2023. "Willingness to Pay for Carbon Mitigation: Field Evidence from the Market for Carbon Offsets," IZA Discussion Papers 15939, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Raffaele Fiorentino, 2025. "Nudging towards sustainability: Exploring the role of behavioral interventions in circular bio‐economy development for the fashion industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 661-678, January.
    7. Shao, Shuai & Tian, Zhihua & Fan, Meiting, 2018. "Do the rich have stronger willingness to pay for environmental protection? New evidence from a survey in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 83-94.
    8. Li, Qianwen & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2018. "Differences and influencing factors for Chinese urban resident willingness to pay for green housings: Evidence from five first-tier cities in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 299-313.
    9. Emma J. Frew & David K. Whynes & Jane L. Wolstenholme, 2003. "Eliciting Willingness to Pay: Comparing Closed-Ended with Open-Ended and Payment Scale Formats," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(2), pages 150-159, March.
    10. Niklas Jakobsson & Raya Muttarak & Mi Ah Schoyen, 2018. "Dividing the pie in the eco-social state: Exploring the relationship between public support for environmental and welfare policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(2), pages 313-339, March.
    11. Qiannan Zhuo & Chen Liu & Beiqi Wang & Wanglin Yan, 2023. "Bridging Local Governments and Residents for Household Waste Source Separation Using a Business-Driven, Multi-Stakeholder Cooperative Partnership Model—A Case Study of HUGE Recycling in Yuhang, Hangzh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Friedrich, 2022. "How environmental goals influence consumer willingness-to-pay for a plastic tax: a discrete-choice analytical study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8218-8245, June.
    2. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Do we really understand the development of China's new energy industry?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 733-745.
    3. Tancrède Voituriez, 2020. "The quest for green welfare state in developing countries," Working Papers hal-02876972, HAL.
    4. Michael Ahlheim & Oliver Frör & Antonia Heinke & Alwin Keil & Nguyen Minh Duc & Pham Van Dinh & Camille Saint-Macary & Manfred Zeller, 2008. "Landslides in mountainous regions of Northern Vietnam: Causes, protection strategies and the assessment of economic losses," Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim 298/2008, Department of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Germany.
    5. Yu Hao & Yingting Wang & Qiuwei Wu & Shiwei Sun & Weilu Wang & Menglin Cui, 2020. "What affects residents' participation in the circular economy for sustainable development? Evidence from China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1251-1268, September.
    6. Schwarzinger, Michaël & Carrat, Fabrice & Luchini, Stéphane, 2009. ""If you have the flu symptoms, your asymptomatic spouse may better answer the willingness-to-pay question": Evidence from a double-bounded dichotomous choice model with heterogeneous anchori," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 873-884, July.
    7. Shao-nan Shan & Xia Duan & Ting-ting Zhang & Yi Zhang & He Wang, 2021. "The impact of environmental benefits and institutional trust on residents’ willingness to participate in municipal solid waste treatment: a case study in Beijing, China [Burn or bury? A social cost," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 1170-1186.
    8. Huan Wang, 2022. "Knowledge or Responsibility? The Role of Media Use on Citizens’ Willingness to Pay for Environment Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Zhixing Li & Xin He & Zhuojun Ding & Md. Mehrab Hossain & Md. Tanvir Rahman Rifat & Md. Habibur Rahman Sobuz & Yafei Zhao, 2024. "Analysis of influencing factors for housing construction technology in Desakota Village and town communities in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Shiela Mae C. Ilagan & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Josephine D. German & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Kyla Marie P. Pabalan, 2024. "Holistic Antecedent Analysis of Behavioral Intention among Green Consumers in the Philippines: A Sustainability Theory of the Planned Behavior Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Watson, Verity & Ryan, Mandy, 2007. "Exploring preference anomalies in double bounded contingent valuation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 463-482, May.
    12. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tri Vu Phu & Tuyet-Anh T. Le & Quy Van Khuc, 2021. "Exploring Inner-City Residents’ and Foreigners’ Commitment to Improving Air Pollution: Evidence from a Field Survey in Hanoi, Vietnam," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-13, April.
    13. Miao Han & Yan Zhou & Taryn Mendonca, 2024. "Impacts of high-technology product exports on climate change mitigation in Belt and Road countries: the mediating role of renewable energy source and human capital accumulation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1939-1964, January.
    14. Thyberg, Krista L. & Tonjes, David J., 2016. "Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 110-123.
    15. García-García, Pablo & Buendía, Luis & Carpintero, Óscar, 2022. "Welfare regimes as enablers of just energy transitions: Revisiting and testing the hypothesis of synergy for Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    16. Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Hao & Deng, Nana & Cheng, Kaiwei & Lu, Bin & Zhang, Bin & Wang, Bo, 2020. "How to effectively implement an incentive-based residential electricity demand response policy? Experience from large-scale trials and matching questionnaires," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Brendan Bo O’Connor & Karen Lee & Dylan Campbell & Liane Young, 2022. "Moral psychology from the lab to the wild: Relief registries as a paradigm for studying real-world altruism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Carola Braun & Katrin Rehdanz & Ulrich Schmidt, 2016. "Validity of Willingness to Pay Measures under Preference Uncertainty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Yujing Guo & Qian Zhang & Kin Keung Lai & Yingqin Zhang & Shubin Wang & Wanli Zhang, 2020. "The Impact of Urban Transportation Infrastructure on Air Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Tong Hu & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Nurul Hassan Reza & Mengling Wu & Qing Yang, 2024. "Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3269-:d:1629463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.