IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10572-d1535245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Connection Market Trading Issues of Green Certificates and CCER Based on Contribution Degree and Social Welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Li

    (Development Division of State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company, Economic and Technological Research Institute, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Lili Gou

    (State Grid Wuwei Electric Power Supply Company, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Haiwen Zhang

    (Development Division of State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company, Economic and Technological Research Institute, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Jiacheng Guo

    (Development Division of State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company, Economic and Technological Research Institute, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Mengyu Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shuxia Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

The connection between the green certificate market and the CCER market can further achieve the dual carbon goals, so it is imperative for the green certificate market, CCER market, and the connection market to coexist. it is necessary to convert green certificates into CCER in the connection market to achieve transactions between the two. The research is aimed at exploring the interface between green certificates and CCER, with the main objective of finding trading mode and trading method to address the interface between the two. This paper firstly proposes a concept of contribution degree that assists fair trading in the market, based on the different ways in which contribution degree is introduced in the trading of green certificates, CCER markets, and connecting markets, and establishes basic trading mode, unilateral contribution trading mode (UCM) and bilateral contribution trading mode. Then, the rolling matching trading model with the goal of maximizing total social welfare, the contribution degree model and the effect test model are established to realize the implementation of the above three modes through different combinations of the models. Finally, the quantitative results are obtained by simulating the trading situation of the three modes, and CCER offset ratio and contribution degree indicator weight are discussed. The results show that it is feasible to build a bridging market between green certificate and CCER by using the contribution degree, in which the UCM is the optimal solution to achieve the dual-carbon goal and market development. The setting of CCER offset ratio can be based on the difference of enterprise types, and the weight of indicators affecting the contribution level should be adjusted with the policy. The research in this paper has the following contributions: (1) a new criterion to satisfy fair trade—contribution degree is proposed to provide ideas for mutual recognition of products in the bridging market, and proposed a contribution degree calculation model for the green certificate and CCER markets, as well as the bridging market; (2) from the perspective of the contradiction between supply and demand in the market and fair trade, different schemes to build a bridging market are given in a fixed context and compared and analyzed; (3) from the market level, the quantitative analysis of the indicator settings affecting emission reduction, providing suggestions for the differentiated evaluation of warrants and the formulation of carbon reduction policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Li & Lili Gou & Haiwen Zhang & Jiacheng Guo & Mengyu Wang & Shuxia Yang, 2024. "Research on the Connection Market Trading Issues of Green Certificates and CCER Based on Contribution Degree and Social Welfare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10572-:d:1535245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Xinyue & Guo, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xingping, 2024. "Mutual conversion mechanisms for environmental interest products to jointly enhance synergistic effect between power, CET and TGC markets in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Amundsen, Eirik S. & Nese, Gjermund, 2009. "Integration of tradable green certificate markets: What can be expected?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 903-922, November.
    3. Bae, Jeong Hwan & Rishi, Meenakshi & Li, Dmitriy, 2021. "Consumer preferences for a green certificate program in South Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Finjord, Fredrik & Hagspiel, Verena & Lavrutich, Maria & Tangen, Marius, 2018. "The impact of Norwegian-Swedish green certificate scheme on investment behavior: A wind energy case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 373-389.
    5. Shahnazari, Mahdi & McHugh, Adam & Maybee, Bryan & Whale, Jonathan, 2017. "Overlapping carbon pricing and renewable support schemes under political uncertainty: Global lessons from an Australian case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 237-248.
    6. Zhang, Chongchong & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "Impact of introducing Chinese certified emission reduction scheme to the carbon market: Promoting renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ganhammar, Kajsa, 2021. "The effect of regulatory uncertainty in green certificate markets: Evidence from the Swedish-Norwegian market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Kwag, Kyuhyeong & Shin, Hansol & Oh, Hyobin & Yun, Sangmin & Kim, Tae Hyun & Hwang, Pyeong-Ik & Kim, Wook, 2023. "Bilevel programming approach for the quantitative analysis of renewable portfolio standards considering the electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    3. Woo, JongRoul & Moon, Sungho & Choi, Hyunhong, 2022. "Economic value and acceptability of advanced solar power systems for multi-unit residential buildings: The case of South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    4. Fagiani, Riccardo & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2014. "The role of regulatory uncertainty in certificate markets: A case study of the Swedish/Norwegian market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 608-618.
    5. Li, Wei & Lu, Can & Zhang, Yan-Wu, 2019. "Prospective exploration of future renewable portfolio standard schemes in China via a multi-sector CGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 45-56.
    6. Amundsen, Eirik Schrøder & Nese, Gjermund, 2016. "Market power in interactive environmental and energy markets: The case of green certificates," Working Papers in Economics 04/16, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    7. Bigerna, Simona & Wen, Xingang & Hagspiel, Verena & Kort, Peter M., 2019. "Green electricity investments: Environmental target and the optimal subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 635-644.
    8. Song, Yazhi & Liu, Tiansen & Liang, Dapeng & Li, Yin & Song, Xiaoqiu, 2019. "A Fuzzy Stochastic Model for Carbon Price Prediction Under the Effect of Demand-related Policy in China's Carbon Market," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 253-265.
    9. Locatelli, Giorgio & Mancini, Mauro & Lotti, Giovanni, 2020. "A simple-to-implement real options method for the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Bigerna, Simona & Hagspiel, Verena & Kort, Peter M. & Wen, Xingang, 2023. "How damaging are environmental policy targets in terms of welfare?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(1), pages 354-372.
    11. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Hussain, Jafar & Mu, Xian, 2024. "Renewable energy and carbon-neutral gaming: A holistic approach to sustainable electricity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    12. Schusser, Sandra & Jaraitė, Jūratė, 2018. "Explaining the interplay of three markets: Green certificates, carbon emissions and electricity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Sibylle Braungardt & Veit Bürger & Benjamin Köhler, 2021. "Carbon Pricing and Complementary Policies—Consistency of the Policy Mix for Decarbonizing Buildings in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Wang, Ge & Zhang, Qi & Su, Bin & Shen, Bo & Li, Yan & Li, Zhengjun, 2021. "Coordination of tradable carbon emission permits market and renewable electricity certificates market in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Fagiani, Riccardo & Richstein, Jörn C. & Hakvoort, Rudi & De Vries, Laurens, 2014. "The dynamic impact of carbon reduction and renewable support policies on the electricity sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 28-41.
    16. Sun, Yanming, 2016. "The optimal percentage requirement and welfare comparisons in a two-country electricity market with a common tradable green certificate system," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 322-327.
    17. Xin-gang Zhao & Yu-zhuo Zhang & Yan-bin Li, 2018. "The Evolution of Renewable Energy Price Policies Based on Improved Bass Model: A System Dynamics (SD) Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Chutian Yu & Xinyi Lai & Fei Chen & Chenwei Jiang & Yikai Sun & Lijun Zhang & Fushuan Wen & Donglian Qi, 2022. "Multi-Time Period Optimal Dispatch Strategy for Integrated Energy System Considering Renewable Energy Generation Accommodation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Wang, Bing & Wei, Yi-Ming & Yuan, Xiao-Chen, 2018. "Possible design with equity and responsibility in China’s renewable portfolio standards," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 685-694.
    20. Fan, Xinghua & Lv, Xiangxiang & Yin, Jiuli & Tian, Lixin & Liang, Jiaochen, 2019. "Multifractality and market efficiency of carbon emission trading market: Analysis using the multifractal detrended fluctuation technique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10572-:d:1535245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.