IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10525-d1533680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative Impact of the Digital Sector, Eco-Friendly Policies, and Sophisticated Economic Development: A Study Drawing from China’s Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaomei Li

    (College of Marxism, Chongqing Jiaotong University, 66 Xuefu Road Nan’an District, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Huchuan Deng

    (College of Marxism, Southwest University, 2 Tiansheng Road Beibei District, Chongqing 400715, China)

  • Xuanrui Yu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing Shapingba District, Chongqing 401331, China)

  • Yang Yu

    (Centre for Infrastructural Engineering and Safety, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
    Multidisciplinary Center for Infrastructure Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China)

Abstract

Amid the rapidly changing digital environment and the growing flow of information, the digital economy has become a significant driving force behind economic progress. At the same time, governments worldwide are increasingly prioritizing environmental protection and green development, making the challenge of harmonizing economic growth with environmental protection to achieve high-quality development, a critical issue. This study, using data from 285 prefecture-level cities in China, places the digital economy, environmental regulations, and high-quality economic development in the same framework to explore their interconnections. Furthermore, machine learning and the SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) model were employed to analyze the complex nonlinear effects and interactions between these factors, clarifying the significance of various parameters. The findings reveal significant regional differences in high-quality economic growth, digital industrialization, industrial digitization, digital governance, data valorization, and environmental regulations across China, with generally low overall levels. Digital governance, industrial digitization, and digital industrialization all contribute to high-quality economic development, with digital industrialization having the most significant impact. However, challenges such as data privacy concerns and inadequate governance can hinder the positive effects of data valorization on high-quality economic progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaomei Li & Huchuan Deng & Xuanrui Yu & Yang Yu, 2024. "Cooperative Impact of the Digital Sector, Eco-Friendly Policies, and Sophisticated Economic Development: A Study Drawing from China’s Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10525-:d:1533680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi Chen & Zhigang Chen, 2021. "Can China’s Environmental Regulations Effectively Reduce Pollution Emissions?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Stefan Ambec & Mark A. Cohen & Stewart Elgie & Paul Lanoie, 2013. "The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 7(1), pages 2-22, January.
    3. Ferjani, Ali, 2011. "Environmental Regulation and Productivity: A Data Envelopment Analysis for Swiss Dairy Farms," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(01).
    4. Muhammad Noman Shafique & Ammar Rashid & Sook Fern Yeo & Umar Adeel, 2023. "Transforming Supply Chains: Powering Circular Economy with Analytics, Integration and Flexibility Using Dual Theory and Deep Learning with PLS-SEM-ANN Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Brunnermeier, Smita B. & Cohen, Mark A., 2003. "Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 278-293, March.
    6. Luo, Kang & Liu, Yaobin & Chen, Pei-Fen & Zeng, Mingli, 2022. "Assessing the impact of digital economy on green development efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. I.V. Zimakova & A.N. Kalashnikov & S.I. Kretsu & A.V. Kurillo, 2019. "Factors and Conditions of Functioning and Development of Modern Regional Socio-Economic Systems," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 371-377.
    8. Fei-Fei Ye & Ying-Ming Wang, 2019. "The effects of two types of environmental regulations on economic efficiency: An analysis of Chinese industries," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(5), pages 898-929, August.
    9. Tao Lin & Lijun Wang & Jingbo Wu, 2022. "Environmental Regulations, Green Technology Innovation, and High-Quality Economic Development in China: Application of Mediation and Threshold Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Liu & Yamei Li & Jiangfeng Hu, 2024. "Does the Yangtze River Protection Strategy help heavily polluting corporates deleverage? Evidence from corporates in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    3. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Ren, Shenggang & Hu, Yucai & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Yangjie, 2020. "Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Giovanni Marin & Francesca Lotti, 2017. "Productivity effects of eco-innovations using data on eco-patents," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(1), pages 125-148.
    6. Patricia Laurens & Christian Le Bas & Stéphane Lhuillery & Antoine Schoen, 2017. "The determinants of cleaner energy innovations of the world’s largest firms: the impact of firm learning and knowledge capital," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 311-333, May.
    7. Mengqi Gong & Zhe You & Linting Wang & Jinhua Cheng, 2020. "Environmental Regulation, Trade Comparative Advantage, and the Manufacturing Industry’s Green Transformation and Upgrading," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2021. "Firms’ growth, green gazelles and eco-innovation: evidence from a sample of European firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1721-1738, April.
    9. Takahiko Kiso, 2019. "Environmental Policy and Induced Technological Change: Evidence from Automobile Fuel Economy Regulations," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(2), pages 785-810, October.
    10. Croce, Annalisa & Toschi, Laura & Ughetto, Elisa & Zanni, Sara, 2024. "Cleantech and policy framework in Europe: A machine learning approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Francesco Crespi & Claudia Ghisetti & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: a survey and a test," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 343-370, December.
    12. Cameron Hepburn & Jacquelyn Pless & David Popp, 2018. "Policy Brief—Encouraging Innovation that Protects Environmental Systems: Five Policy Proposals," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 154-169.
    13. Raphael Calel & Antoine Dechezleprêtre, 2016. "Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(1), pages 173-191, March.
    14. Qi Gong & Jiahui Gu & Zhaoyang Kong & Siyan Shen & Xiucheng Dong & Yang Li & Chade Li, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Claudia Ghisetti & Francesco Quatraro, 2013. "Beyond the Inducement in Climate Change: Do Environmental Performances Spur Enrivornmental Technologies? A Regional Analysis of Cross-Sectoral Differences," Working Papers 2013112, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    16. Husain, Shaiara & Sohag, Kazi & Wu, Yanrui, 2024. "Proven reserve oil and renewable energy nexus: Efficacy of policy stringency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Bu, Maoliang & Qiao, Zhenzi & Liu, Beibei, 2020. "Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 10-18.
    18. Liu, Wei & Zhao, Zhihui & Wen, Zhao & Cheng, Shixiong, 2022. "Environmental regulation and OFDI: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 191-208.
    19. Du, Kerui & Cheng, Yuanyuan & Yao, Xin, 2021. "Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10525-:d:1533680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.