IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10321-d1529303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of High-Tech Policies on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Qin

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Mao Zhang

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

In light of resource and environmental constraints, the economic growth model is undergoing significant transformations. New quality productivity is the latest high-tech policy in China’s current development. Comprehensively improving the new quality productivity level of enterprises is the core driving force behind promoting productivity progress and sustainable development. The objective of this study was to employ machine learning techniques to comprehensively assess the level of new quality productivity exhibited by enterprises and to identify the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics thereof. Additionally, the study sought to investigate the impact and the specific mechanism of new quality productivity on the ESG performance of enterprises from a micro perspective. The study revealed that new quality productivity has a considerable impact on the ESG performance of enterprises, particularly in cases where the enterprise has a long history and is engaged in significant pollution. The underlying mechanism is that new quality productivity can enhance an enterprise’s ESG performance by alleviating financing constraints and improving the efficiency of employee innovation. Additionally, further research indicated that new quality productivity primarily influences the environmental and social ratings of enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Qin & Mao Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of High-Tech Policies on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10321-:d:1529303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10321/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10321/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baochen Yang & Chunying Guo & Ying Fan, 2024. "Institutional Investor Networks and ESG Performance: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 113-137, January.
    2. Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing & Fu, Xiaolan, 2021. "Varieties in state capitalism and corporate innovation: Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Shanker Satyanath & Nico Voigtländer & Hans-Joachim Voth, 2017. "Bowling for Fascism: Social Capital and the Rise of the Nazi Party," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 125(2), pages 478-526.
    4. Guangyou Zhou & Lian Liu & Sumei Luo, 2022. "Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3371-3387, November.
    5. Grazia Dicuonzo & Francesca Donofrio & Simona Ranaldo & Vittorio Dell'Atti, 2022. "The effect of innovation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 1191-1209, April.
    6. Arellano, Manuel & Bover, Olympia, 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-51, July.
    7. Xiaoke Zhang & Xuankai Zhao & Yu He, 2022. "Does It Pay to Be Responsible? The Performance of ESG Investing in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 3048-3075, September.
    8. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    9. Yang Liu & Yanlin Yang & Huihui Li & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China’s Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    11. Susanne Arvidsson & John Dumay, 2022. "Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1091-1110, March.
    12. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2011. "When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(1), pages 35-65, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shanshan Lyu & Mingzeng Yang & Qincheng Zhang, 2024. "Top Management Team Heterogeneity, Top Management Incentives, and ESG Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Chang Liu & Zihao Xin, 2024. "Does environmental, social, and governance practice boost corporate human capital inflow in China? From the perspective of stakeholder response," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3251-3273, July.
    3. Sheng, Jichuan & Ding, Rui & Yang, Hongqiang, 2024. "Corporate green innovation in an aging population: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Xue, Qinyuan & Jin, Yifei & Zhang, Cheng, 2024. "ESG rating results and corporate total factor productivity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).
    5. Mari Sako & George Chondrakis & Paul M. Vaaler, 2016. "How Do Plural-Sourcing Firms Make and Buy? The Impact of Supplier Portfolio Design," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1161-1182, October.
    6. Ahsan Habib & Mostafa Monzur Hasan, 2020. "Business strategies and annual report readability," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2513-2547, September.
    7. Jianbang Xu & Yimin Wang, 2025. "Exploring New Green Frontiers? How CEO Green and Technological Experience Shapes Firm Ambidextrous Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Fengyu Zhao & Ziqing Xu & Xiaowen Xie, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Digital Economy in Enhanced Green Productivity in China’s Manufacturing Sector: Fresh Evidence for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Liu, Xiangqiang & Liu, Jiayi & Liu, Jia & Zhai, Qiong, 2024. "Can investor-firm interactions mitigate ESG rating divergence? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    10. Haoming Ding & Wonhee Lee, 2024. "ESG and Financial Performance of China Firms: The Mediating Role of Export Share and Moderating Role of Carbon Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Li Wang & Hongyu Yang, 2024. "Digital technology innovation and corporate ESG performance: evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 1-32, December.
    12. Meles, Antonio & Salerno, Dario & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo & Zhang, Jianing, 2023. "The influence of green innovation on default risk: Evidence from Europe," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 692-710.
    13. Tiantian Meng & Dan Lu & Danni Yu & M. H. Yahya & Mohd Ashhari Zariyawati, 2024. "Is executive compensation aligned with the company’s ESG objectives? Evidence from Chinese listed companies based on the PSM-DID approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Zheng, Min & Huang, Rong & Wang, Xintong & Li, Xiaorong, 2023. "Do firms adopting cloud computing technology exhibit higher future performance? A textual analysis approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Xu, Jing & Li, Haizheng, 2023. "Managerial human capital and corporate R&D investment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 151-171.
    16. Marie, Mohamed & Qi, Baolei & Elgammal, Mohammed & Elnahass, Marwa, 2024. "A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Wan, Guochao & Zhang, Weike & Li, Chao, 2024. "How does low-carbon city pilot policy catalyze companies toward ESG practices? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1593-1607.
    18. Acheampong Albert & Ngozi Ibeji & Freeman Owusu & Thuy Nguyen, 2025. "Narrative Disclosure Tone and Bank Risk: The Role of Economic Policy Uncertainty," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(6), pages 3428-3447, September.
    19. Chen Xu & Yu He, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Green Technology Innovation: A Moderating Effect Based on Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Siddhartha Barman & Jitendra Mahakud, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Policy Uncertainty, Geopolitical Risk, and Sustainable Disclosure on Corporate Performance," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 32(1), pages 167-203, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10321-:d:1529303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.