IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p10022-d1522643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting the Economic Sustainability of Small-Scale Farmers Through Versatile Machinery in the Republic of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Seokho Kang

    (Department of Bio-Industrial Machinery Engineering, Kyungpook National University, College of Agriculture, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea)

  • Haesung Jung

    (Korea Planning & Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology, Donggu, Cheomdan-ro 8, 32, Daegu 41069, Republic of Korea)

  • Seunggwi Kwon

    (Bulls Co., Ltd., Gyeongsangbuk-do, Seongju 40053, Republic of Korea)

  • Youngyoon Jang

    (Sungboo Co., Ltd., Gyeongsangbuk-do, Chilgok-gun 39909, Republic of Korea)

  • Seungmin Woo

    (Korea Planning & Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology, Donggu, Cheomdan-ro 8, 32, Daegu 41069, Republic of Korea)

  • Yushin Ha

    (Department of Bio-Industrial Machinery Engineering, Kyungpook National University, College of Agriculture, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
    Korea Planning & Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology, Donggu, Cheomdan-ro 8, 32, Daegu 41069, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The increasing use of tractors and implements is replacing manual labor, but adds financial burdens on small-scale farmers due to rising costs. Many farmers have turned to leasing and renting machinery to mitigate these expenses, while repair and maintenance costs remain significant. Government interventions aim to alleviate these burdens, but income disparities between urban and rural areas persist, and the impact of machinery use on climate change and the environment poses further challenges. Strategies like omitting some operation steps and adopting versatile machinery are proposed to cut costs and promote economic sustainability for small-scale farmers. Therefore, this study assessed the economic benefits of using versatile machinery in farming, especially for small-scale rural farmers. Farming processes were divided into field preparation and crop season activities. Field preparation included rotary tillage, ridge formation, and mulching, whereas crop season activities included harvesting and transportation. Annual usage and production cost analyses per hectare, including labor, fuel, and interest, alongside purchasing cost surveys, were conducted. Versatile machinery reduced annual usage costs for field preparation and crop season activities by 63.54% and 71.71%, respectively. This effect was more pronounced for farms under 2 ha, especially those employing manual harvest and transportation. Small-scale farmers, such as those cultivating hot pepper farms, are strongly encouraged to adopt versatile machinery to mitigate expenses and labor costs. The significance of adopting studied methodology will be amplified with the rising cost of labor. Consequently, utilization of versatile machinery in field farming for small-scale farms is projected to increase incomes not through enhanced production, but by significantly reducing the annual usage costs associated with agricultural machinery. This approach not only alleviates financial burdens but also enhances the sustainability of farm management, ensuring long-term viability and environmental stewardship.

Suggested Citation

  • Seokho Kang & Haesung Jung & Seunggwi Kwon & Youngyoon Jang & Seungmin Woo & Yushin Ha, 2024. "Promoting the Economic Sustainability of Small-Scale Farmers Through Versatile Machinery in the Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10022-:d:1522643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lambert, Lixia H. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Ripberger, Joseph T., 2022. "Public Willingness to Pay for Farmer Adoption of Best Management Practices," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 224-241, May.
    2. Zhenling Cui & Hongyan Zhang & Xinping Chen & Chaochun Zhang & Wenqi Ma & Chengdong Huang & Weifeng Zhang & Guohua Mi & Yuxin Miao & Xiaolin Li & Qiang Gao & Jianchang Yang & Zhaohui Wang & Youliang Y, 2018. "Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers," Nature, Nature, vol. 555(7696), pages 363-366, March.
    3. Pan, Lei & Christiaensen, Luc, 2012. "Who is Vouching for the Input Voucher? Decentralized Targeting and Elite Capture in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 1619-1633.
    4. Pengkun Zheng & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2024. "Does Rural Labor Transfer Impact Chinese Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency? A Substitution Perspective of Agricultural Machinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Debrah, Godwin & Adanu, Kwami, 2022. "Does the Inverse Farm Size-Productivity Hypothesis Hold Beyond Five Hectares? Evidence from Ghana," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 548-559, August.
    6. Viet Ha Trinh Thi & Wenqi Zhou, 2024. "A Systematic Analysis of the Development of Agricultural Modernization and Its Effect on Crop Production in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-12, June.
    7. El Benni, Nadja & Irek, Judith & Finger, Robert & Mack, Gabriele & Ammann, Jeanine, 2024. "Citizens’ perceptions of agricultural policy goals—evidence from Switzerland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Tester, Colson A. & Popp, Michael P. & Kemper, Nathan P. & Nalley, Lanier L. & West, Grant, 2019. "Impact of Weather and Herd Size Management on Beef Cow Profitability," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 545-567, November.
    9. Siyu Yang & Wei Li, 2023. "The Impact of Socialized Agricultural Machinery Services on the Labor Transfer of Maize Growers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Lowder, Sarah K. & Skoet, Jakob & Raney, Terri, 2016. "The Number, Size, and Distribution of Farms, Smallholder Farms, and Family Farms Worldwide," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 16-29.
    11. Soltani, G.R., 1976. "Cost-Size Relationships And Traditional Farmers' Economic Behavior," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-6, December.
    12. Soltani, G. R., 1976. "Cost-Size Relationships and Traditional Farmers' Economic Behavior," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 151-156, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Bauluz & Yajna Govind & Filip Novokmet, 2020. "Global Land Inequality," PSE Working Papers halshs-03022318, HAL.
    2. Ruofan Liao & Zhengtao Chen & Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai & Jianxu Liu, 2025. "Enhancing Rural Economic Sustainability in China Through Agricultural Socialization Services: A Novel Perspective on Spatial-Temporal Dynamics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Godfred Addai & Jungho Suh & Douglas Bardsley & Guy Robinson & Lawrence Guodaar, 2024. "Exploring sustainable development within rural regions in Ghana: A rural web approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3890-3907, August.
    4. Nicole M. Mason & Thomas S. Jayne & Nicolas van de Walle, 2017. "The Political Economy of Fertilizer Subsidy Programs in Africa: Evidence from Zambia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 705-731.
    5. Qiuju Wang & Xuanxuan Gao & Baoguang Wu & Jingyang Li & Xin Liu & Jiahe Zou & Qingying Meng, 2025. "Fertility-Based Nitrogen Management Strategies Combined with Straw Return Enhance Rice Yield and Soil Quality in Albic Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Yoko Kijima, 2022. "Effect of Nigeria’s e-voucher input subsidy program on fertilizer use, rice production, and household income," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(4), pages 919-935, August.
    7. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Stoeffler, Quentin & Mills, Bradford & del Ninno, Carlo, 2016. "Reaching the Poor: Cash Transfer Program Targeting in Cameroon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 244-263.
    9. Fujimoto, Takefumi & Suzuki, Aya, 2021. "Do Fertilizer and Seed Subsidies Strengthen Farmers' Market Participation? the Impact of Tanzania NAIVS on Farmers' Purchase of Agricultural Inputs and Their Maize-Selling Activities," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315044, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Hurley, Mason, 2016. "Re-examining Changes in Farm Size Distributions Worldwide Using a Modified Generalized Method of Moments Approach," Master's Theses and Plan B Papers 249287, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. Buddhika Patalee & Glynn T. Tonsor, 2021. "Weather effects on U.S. cow‐calf production: A long‐term panel analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 838-857, October.
    12. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    13. Yuewen Huo & Songlin Ye & Zhou Wu & Fusuo Zhang & Guohua Mi, 2022. "Barriers to the Development of Agricultural Mechanization in the North and Northeast China Plains: A Farmer Survey," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Dang, Hai-Anh H & Carletto, Calogero, 2022. "Recall Bias Revisited: Measure Farm Labor Using Mixed-Mode Surveys and Multiple Imputation," IZA Discussion Papers 14997, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Hung‐Hao Chang & Ashok K. Mishra & Tzong‐Haw Lee, 2019. "A supply‐side analysis of agritourism: Evidence from farm‐level agriculture census data in Taiwan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(3), pages 521-548, July.
    16. Liang Chi & Mengshuai Zhu & Chen Shen & Jing Zhang & Liwei Xing & Xiangyang Zhou, 2023. "Does the Winner Take All in E-Commerce of Agricultural Products under the Background of Platform Monopoly?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Peipei Yang & Wenxu Dong & Marius Heinen & Wei Qin & Oene Oenema, 2022. "Soil Compaction Prevention, Amelioration and Alleviation Measures Are Effective in Mechanized and Smallholder Agriculture: A Meta-Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Regan, Courtney M. & Connor, Jeffery D. & Summers, David M. & Settre, Claire & O’Connor, Patrick J. & Cavagnaro, Timothy R., 2020. "The influence of crediting and permanence periods on Australian forest-based carbon offset supply," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Ruth Hill & Carolina Mejia-Mantilla & Kathryn Vasilaky, 2021. "Is the Price Right? Returns to Input Adoption in Uganda," Working Papers 2105, California Polytechnic State University, Department of Economics.
    20. T. S. Amjath-Babu & Pramod K. Aggarwal & Sonja Vermeulen, 2019. "Climate action for food security in South Asia? Analyzing the role of agriculture in nationally determined contributions to the Paris agreement," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 283-298, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10022-:d:1522643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.