IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7269-d1462876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Parking Type Preference Behavior Differ According to Whether It Is Paid or Free? A Case Study in Istanbul, Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Gürcan Sarısoy

    (Transportation Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Türkiye
    Department of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yalova University, 77200 Yalova, Türkiye)

  • Hüseyin Onur Tezcan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Türkiye)

Abstract

Parking behavior depends on drivers’ choice of parking type and willingness to pay for parking. Generally, the parking type refers to off-street and on-street parking facilities. The main factors affecting the preference for parking types are driver, vehicle, travel, and parking characteristics. Understanding drivers’ parking type preference behavior and accurately modeling drivers’ tendencies helps develop sustainable parking management policies. This study examines the parking preferences of drivers in Istanbul with binary logit models according to whether they pay for parking. The results of the models show that the number of factors influencing parking type preference is higher for free parking than for paid parking, including driver, vehicle, travel, and parking characteristics. Moreover, some factors in the models affect drivers’ parking type preferences differently for paid and free parking. Namely, low-income individuals tend to use on-street parking when parking is free and off-street parking when it is paid. Conversely, individuals who drive small-size vehicles prefer off-street parking for free parking and on-street parking for paid parking. Individuals who prefer off-street parking for free parking expect shorter walking distances to the final destination and parking duration. On the contrary, individuals who choose on-street parking for paid parking anticipate shorter walking distances to the final destination and parking duration.

Suggested Citation

  • Gürcan Sarısoy & Hüseyin Onur Tezcan, 2024. "Does Parking Type Preference Behavior Differ According to Whether It Is Paid or Free? A Case Study in Istanbul, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7269-:d:1462876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Golias & George Yannis & Michel Harvatis, 2002. "Off-Street Parking Choice Sensitivity," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 333-348, January.
    2. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt3x03s541 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Zhan Guo, 2013. "Residential Street Parking and Car Ownership," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(1), pages 32-48, January.
    4. Huanmei Qin & Xiuhan Yang & Yao-Jan Wu & Hongzhi Guan & Pengfei Wang & Nasrin Shahinpoor, 2020. "Analysis of parking cruising behaviour and parking location choice," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 717-734, October.
    5. Huanmei Qin & Ning Xu & Yonghuan Zhang & Qianqian Pang & Zhaolin Lu, 2023. "Research on Parking Recommendation Methods Considering Travelers’ Decision Behaviors and Psychological Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Arnott, Richard & Rowse, John, 2009. "Downtown parking in auto city," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Zong, Fang & Yu, Ping & Tang, Jinjun & Sun, Xiao, 2019. "Understanding parking decisions with structural equation modeling," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 408-417.
    8. Jelena Simićević & Nada Milosavljević, 2023. "The impact of on-street and off-street parking regulations on parking type choice," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 912-928, October.
    9. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt55s7079f is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Andrés Rodríguez & Luigi dell’Olio & José Luis Moura & Borja Alonso & Rubén Cordera, 2023. "Modelling Parking Choice Behaviour Considering Alternative Availability and Systematic and Random Variations in User Tastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    11. D'Acierno, Luca & Gallo, Mariano & Montella, Bruno, 2006. "Optimisation models for the urban parking pricing problem," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 34-48, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paweł Dobrzański & Magdalena Dobrzańska, 2025. "Sustainable Consumption in Urban Transport: A Case Study of a Selected European Union City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navid Nadimi & Mohammad Ali Zayandehroodi & Rosalia Camporeale & Morteza Asadamraji, 2023. "A Framework for Providing Information about Parking Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Zhou, Xizhen & Ding, Xueqi & Yan, Jie & Ji, Yanjie, 2023. "Spatial heterogeneity of urban illegal parking behavior: A geographically weighted Poisson regression approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Nguyen Viet Long & Hoang Thuy Linh & Vu Anh Tuan, 2023. "Towards Smart Parking Management: Econometric Analysis and Modeling of Public-Parking-Choice Behavior in Three Cities of Binh Duong, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Ahmadi Azari, Kian & Arintono, Sulistyo & Hamid, Hussain & Rahmat, Riza Atiq O.K., 2013. "Modelling demand under parking and cordon pricing policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Anna Lower & Agnieszka Szumilas, 2021. "Parking Policy as a Tool of Sustainable Mobility-Parking Standards in Poland vs. European Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Wei Wang & Yuwei Zhou & Jianbin Liu & Baofeng Sun, 2022. "On-Street Cruising for Parking Model in Consideration with Gaming Elements and Its Impact Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Chang, Ching-Ter & Chung, Cheng-Kung & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Chen, Huang-Mu, 2014. "The optimal dual-pricing policy of mall parking service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 223-243.
    8. Inci, Eren, 2015. "A review of the economics of parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 50-63.
    9. Weinberger, Rachel, 2012. "Death by a thousand curb-cuts: Evidence on the effect of minimum parking requirements on the choice to drive," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 93-102.
    10. Saki, Siavash & Hagen, Tobias, 2024. "Cruising for parking again: Measuring the ground truth and using survival analysis to reveal the determinants of the duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    11. Kobus, Martijn B.W. & Gutiérrez-i-Puigarnau, Eva & Rietveld, Piet & Van Ommeren, Jos N., 2013. "The on-street parking premium and car drivers' choice between street and garage parking," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 395-403.
    12. Gössling, Stefan & Humpe, Andreas & Hologa, Rafael & Riach, Nils & Freytag, Tim, 2022. "Parking violations as an economic gamble for public space," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 248-257.
    13. Gallo, Mariano & D'Acierno, Luca & Montella, Bruno, 2011. "A multilayer model to simulate cruising for parking in urban areas," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 735-744, September.
    14. Saki, Siavash & Hagen, Tobias, 2024. "What drives drivers to start cruising for parking? Modeling the start of the search process," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Arnott, Richard & Inci, Eren, 2010. "The stability of downtown parking and traffic congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 260-276, November.
    16. Zhang, Xinying & Pitera, Kelly & Wang, Yuanqing, 2024. "Exploring parking choices under the coexistence of autonomous and conventional vehicles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 636(C).
    17. Xu, Zhengtian & Yin, Yafeng & Zha, Liteng, 2017. "Optimal parking provision for ride-sourcing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 559-578.
    18. Jesper de Groote & Jos van Ommeren & Hans R. A. Koster, 2018. "The Impact of Parking Policy on House Prices," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 52(3), pages 267-26-282.
    19. Scheiner, Joachim & Faust, Nico & Helmer, Johannes & Straub, Michael & Holz-Rau, Christian, 2020. "What's that garage for? Private parking and on-street parking in a high-density urban residential neighbourhood," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Francis Ostermeijer & Hans RA Koster & Leonardo Nunes & Jos van Ommeren, 2021. "Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-015/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7269-:d:1462876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.