IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5615-d1104899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review Discussing the Sustainability of Men and Women’s Work in Industry 4.0: Are Technologies Gender-Neutral?

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Maggioli

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal)

  • Liliana Cunha

    (Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
    Centre for Psychology, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The introduction of new technologies at work in the context of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) has led to the emergence of risks for health, even if they are still underexplored. However, their understanding does not usually adopt a gender perspective, even though the gendered division of work has differentiated health outcomes. As sustainability is at the top of the political agenda and in consideration of the gender segregation that exists at work, it is pertinent to question how I4.0 technologies are reconfiguring workplaces and impacting women and men’s health. Following a systematic review approach using the PRISMA protocol, this study explores how gender is integrated in I4.0-themed studies, exploring employment, work, and health. After the identification and screening phases were completed, a total of 16 papers were included. Literature exploring technological transformation from a gender point of view is scarce, as well as research developed in concrete work contexts. The literature in this domain tends to address employment prospects, and women are generally described as being more at risk for job loss through automation processes. Health risks in the literature found in this review were mostly neither considered nor differentiated for women and men. Future studies should consider the specificities of different work contexts through the development of case studies in different activity sectors so that the risks for women and men can become visible. This way, interventions at a work organization level are enabled to create more sustainable working conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Maggioli & Liliana Cunha, 2023. "A Systematic Review Discussing the Sustainability of Men and Women’s Work in Industry 4.0: Are Technologies Gender-Neutral?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5615-:d:1104899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5615/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5615/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giusto Barisi, 2011. "Les systèmes de travail soutenable, une composante souvent négligée mais fondamentale du développement durable," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 67-87.
    2. Balwant Singh Mehta & Ishwar Awasthi & Nidhi Mehta, 2021. "Women’s Employment and Digital Technology: A Regional Analysis in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 15(3), pages 427-442, December.
    3. Hind Bril El-Haouzi & Etienne Valette & Bettina-Johanna Krings & António Brandão Moniz, 2021. "Social Dimensions in CPS & IoT Based Automated Production Systems," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Isabelle Magne & Collectif, 2019. "La synthèse du colloque « Le travail en mouvement »," Post-Print halshs-02007198, HAL.
    5. Meyer, Brett & Biegert, Thomas, 2019. "The conditional effect of technological change on collective bargaining coverage," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100305, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Ramos, Minerva E. & Garza-Rodríguez, Jorge & Gibaja-Romero, Damian E., 2022. "Automation of employment in the presence of industry 4.0: The case of Mexico," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Brigita Gajšek & Saša Stradovnik & Aleš Hace, 2020. "Sustainable Move towards Flexible, Robotic, Human-Involving Workplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Maja Turk & Marko Šimic & Miha Pipan & Niko Herakovič, 2022. "Multi-Criterial Algorithm for the Efficient and Ergonomic Manual Assembly Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Zeki Murat Çınar & Qasim Zeeshan & Orhan Korhan, 2021. "A Framework for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Smart Manufacturing Enterprises: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-32, June.
    10. David Autor, 2022. "The Labor Market Impacts of Technological Change: From Unbridled Enthusiasm to Qualified Optimism to Vast Uncertainty," NBER Working Papers 30074, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Francesco Costantino & Andrea Falegnami & Lorenzo Fedele & Margherita Bernabei & Sara Stabile & Rosina Bentivenga, 2021. "New and Emerging Hazards for Health and Safety within Digitalized Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-35, October.
    12. Paula Franklin & Wouter Zwysen & Agnieszka Piasna, 2022. "Temporal Dimensions of Job Quality and Gender: Exploring Differences in the Associations of Working Time and Health between Women and Men," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Montobbio & Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito & Marco Vivarelli, 2022. "The empirics of technology, employment and occupations: lessons learned and challenges ahead," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0028, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    2. Julio Henrique Costa Nobrega & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Vasco Sanchez-Rodrigues & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Walter Leal Filho & Milena Pavan Serafim & Rosley Anholon, 2021. "Logistics 4.0 in Brazil: Critical Analysis and Relationships with SDG 9 Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Beier, Grischa & Matthess, Marcel & Shuttleworth, Luke & Guan, Ting & de Oliveira Pereira Grudzien, David Iubel & Xue, Bing & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Chen, Ling, 2022. "Implications of Industry 4.0 on industrial employment: A comparative survey from Brazilian, Chinese, and German practitioners," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Marialuisa Divella & Alessia Lo Turco & Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2023. "Local labour tasks and patenting in US commuting zones," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 1097-1119.
    5. Zetian Yu & Hao Liu & Hua Peng & Qiantong Xia & Xiaoxia Dong, 2023. "Production Efficiency of Raw Milk and Its Determinants: Application of Combining Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Schilirò, Daniele, 2023. "Technological progress and the future of work," MPRA Paper 117927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Philipp Lergetporer & Katharina Wedel & Katharina Werner, 2023. "Automatability of occupations, workers’ labor-market expectations, and willingness to train," Munich Papers in Political Economy 32, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    8. Bhatia, Purvee & Diaz-Elsayed, Nancy, 2023. "Facilitating decision-making for the adoption of smart manufacturing technologies by SMEs via fuzzy TOPSIS," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    9. Arpad Gellert & Stefan-Alexandru Precup & Alexandru Matei & Bogdan-Constantin Pirvu & Constantin-Bala Zamfirescu, 2022. "Real-Time Assembly Support System with Hidden Markov Model and Hybrid Extensions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Jin Liu & Xingchen Xu & Yongjun Li & Yong Tan, 2023. ""Generate" the Future of Work through AI: Empirical Evidence from Online Labor Markets," Papers 2308.05201, arXiv.org.
    11. Barth, Erling & Bryson, Alex & Dale-Olsen, Harald, 2022. "Creative Disruption: Technology Innovation, Labour Demand and the Pandemic," IZA Discussion Papers 15762, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Wojciech Połeć & Daria Murawska, 2021. "The Social Constraints on the Preservation and Sustainable Development of Traditional Crafts in a Developed Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Shun Yiu & Rob Seamans & Manav Raj & Ted Liu, 2024. "Strategic Responses to Technological Change: Evidence from ChatGPT and Upwork," Papers 2403.15262, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    14. Wenchao Jin, 2022. "Occupational polarisation and endogenous task-biased technical change," Working Paper Series 0622, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Trevor Peckham & Noah Seixas & A. B. de Castro & Anjum Hajat, 2022. "Do Different Patterns of Employment Quality Contribute to Gender Health Inequities in the U.S.? A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Giorgio Cutuli & Alessio Tomelleri, 2023. "Returns to digital skills use, temporary employment, and trade unions in European labour markets," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(4), pages 393-413, December.
    17. Schneider, Benjamin & Vipond, Hillary, 2023. "The past and future of work: how history can inform the age of automation," Economic History Working Papers 119282, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    18. Philipp Lergetporer & Katharina Wedel & Katharina Werner, 2023. "Automatability of Occupations, Workers' Labor-market Expectations, and Willingness to Train," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 488, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    19. Borsato, Andrea & Lorentz, André, 2023. "The Kaldor–Verdoorn law at the age of robots and AI," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).
    20. Montobbio, F. & Staccioli, J. & Virgillito, M.E. & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "The empirics of technology, employment and occupations," MERIT Working Papers 2022-037, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5615-:d:1104899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.