IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3821-d1074209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Directional Distance Function to Measure the Environmental Efficiency of International Liner Shipping Companies and Assess Regulatory Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Yi-Hui Liao

    (Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan)

  • Hsuan-Shih Lee

    (Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan
    Department of Information Management, Ming Chuan University, Taipei 111005, Taiwan)

Abstract

Maritime transport relies on a large amounts of fossil fuels. It provides cargo-carrying services but simultaneously emits enormous amounts of by-products such as CO 2 , which cause climate change. The IMO has adopted mandatory measures to reduce the shipping industry’s greenhouse gas emissions by at least 70% by 2050, relative to 2008. In this paper, we select 11 liner shipping companies as decision-making units (DMUs) that account for more than 80% of the world’s shipping capacity. Utilizing the directional distance function, we estimate their environmental efficiency in 2019, 2020, and 2021. The directional vector serves to expand desired outputs and contract undesirable outputs. The larger the distance, the farther the evaluated unit is from the production frontier, and the less environmentally efficient it is assessed. This study compares the impact of environmental regulations on liner shipping based on two methods of dealing with undesirable outputs. Since the results indicate the low overall environmental efficiency of liner shipping, firms should strengthen their decarbonization efforts to achieve environmental efficiency goals. Moreover, the results also demonstrate that environmental regulations significantly impact liner shipping companies and that they need to reduce by-product outputs to comply with regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi-Hui Liao & Hsuan-Shih Lee, 2023. "Using a Directional Distance Function to Measure the Environmental Efficiency of International Liner Shipping Companies and Assess Regulatory Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3821-:d:1074209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3821/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3821/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, David Z.W., 2021. "A joint liner ship path, speed and deployment problem under emission reduction measures," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 155-173.
    2. Shi, Yubing, 2016. "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping: Is it time to consider market-based measures?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 123-134.
    3. Hee-Seok Bang & Hyo-Won Kang & Jeffrey Martin & Su-Han Woo, 2012. "The impact of operational and strategic management on liner shipping efficiency: a two-stage DEA approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 653-672, December.
    4. Jong-Kyun Woo & Daniel Seong-Hyeok Moon, 2014. "The effects of slow steaming on the environmental performance in liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 176-191, March.
    5. Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Pasurka, Carl A., 2007. "Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1055-1066.
    6. J. Augusto Felício & Ricardo Rodrigues & Vitor Caldeirinha, 2021. "Green Shipping Effect on Sustainable Economy and Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Kumar Mandal, Sabuj & Madheswaran, S., 2010. "Environmental efficiency of the Indian cement industry: An interstate analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 1108-1118, February.
    8. K Fagerholt & G Laporte & I Norstad, 2010. "Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(3), pages 523-529, March.
    9. Chao, Shih-Liang & Yu, Ming-Miin & Hsieh, Wei-Fan, 2018. "Evaluating the efficiency of major container shipping companies: A framework of dynamic network DEA with shared inputs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 44-57.
    10. Panayides, Photis M. & Lambertides, Neophytos & Savva, Christos S., 2011. "The relative efficiency of shipping companies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 681-694, September.
    11. Picazo-Tadeo, Andres J. & Reig-Martinez, Ernest & Hernandez-Sancho, Francesc, 2005. "Directional distance functions and environmental regulation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 131-142, June.
    12. Watanabe, Michio & Tanaka, Katsuya, 2007. "Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry: A directional distance function approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6323-6331, December.
    13. Oggioni, G. & Riccardi, R. & Toninelli, R., 2011. "Eco-efficiency of the world cement industry: A data envelopment analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2842-2854, May.
    14. Fare, Rolf, et al, 1989. "Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs Are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(1), pages 90-98, February.
    15. Qi, Xiangtong & Song, Dong-Ping, 2012. "Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 863-880.
    16. Styliani Livaniou & Georgios A. Papadopoulos, 2022. "Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as a Transitional Choice Replacing Marine Conventional Fuels (Heavy Fuel Oil/Marine Diesel Oil), towards the Era of Decarbonisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Chambers, Robert G. & Chung, Yangho & Fare, Rolf, 1996. "Benefit and Distance Functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 407-419, August.
    18. Gong, Xiaoxing & Wu, Xiaofan & Luo, Meifeng, 2019. "Company performance and environmental efficiency: A case study for shipping enterprises," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 96-106.
    19. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    20. Shih-Liang Chao, 2017. "Integrating multi-stage data envelopment analysis and a fuzzy analytical hierarchical process to evaluate the efficiency of major global liner shipping companies," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 496-511, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trinks, Arjan & Mulder, Machiel & Scholtens, Bert, 2020. "An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Kumar Mandal, Sabuj & Madheswaran, S., 2010. "Environmental efficiency of the Indian cement industry: An interstate analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 1108-1118, February.
    3. Riccardi, R. & Oggioni, G. & Toninelli, R., 2012. "Efficiency analysis of world cement industry in presence of undesirable output: Application of data envelopment analysis and directional distance function," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 140-152.
    4. Ke Wang & Yujiao Xian & Chia-Yen Lee & Yi-Ming Wei & Zhimin Huang, 2019. "On selecting directions for directional distance functions in a non-parametric framework: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 43-76, July.
    5. H. Pierre Hsieh & Kuo‐Cheng Kuo & Minh‐Hieu Le & Wen‐Min Lu, 2021. "Exploring the cargo and eco‐efficiencies of international container shipping companies: A network‐based ranking approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 45-60, January.
    6. Bruno, Clementina & Manello, Alessandro, 2015. "Benchmarking and effects of reforms in the fixed telecommunications industry: A DDF approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 127-139.
    7. Manello, Alessandro, 2017. "Productivity growth, environmental regulation and win–win opportunities: The case of chemical industry in Italy and Germany," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 733-743.
    8. Kounetas, Konstantinos & Zervopoulos, Panagiotis D., 2019. "A cross-country evaluation of environmental performance: Is there a convergence-divergence pattern in technology gaps?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1136-1148.
    9. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2014. "Environmental assessment for corporate sustainability by resource utilization and technology innovation: DEA radial measurement on Japanese industrial sectors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 295-307.
    10. Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Rao, D.S. Prasada, 2010. "Measuring and decomposing sustainable efficiency in agricultural production: A cumulative exergy balance approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1765-1776, July.
    11. Falavigna, G. & Ippoliti, R., 2020. "The socio-economic planning of a community nurses programme in mountain areas: A Directional Distance Function approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Niu, Yiran & Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Shen, Zhiyang & Vardanyan, Michael, 2024. "Performance evaluation using multi-stage production frameworks: Assessing the tradeoffs among the economic, environmental, and social well-being," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 1000-1013.
    13. Joohwan Kim & Hwayoung Kim, 2021. "Evaluation of the Efficiency of Maritime Transport Using a Network Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) Approach: A Case Study on the Korean Coastal Ferry Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Yongrok Choi & Hyoung Seok Lee, 2016. "Are Emissions Trading Policies Sustainable? A Study of the Petrochemical Industry in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, October.
    15. Gang Tian & Jian Shi & Licheng Sun & Xingle Long & Benhai Guo, 2017. "Dynamic changes in the energy–carbon performance of Chinese transportation sector: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(2), pages 585-607, November.
    16. Zhang, Ning & Zhou, P. & Choi, Yongrok, 2013. "Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance functionanalysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 653-662.
    17. Víctor Giménez & Claudio Thieme & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2014. "An international comparison of educational systems: an application of the global Malmquist-Luenberger index," Working Papers 2014/18, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    18. Emrouznejad, Ali & Yang, Guo-liang, 2016. "CO2 emissions reduction of Chinese light manufacturing industries: A novel RAM-based global Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 397-410.
    19. Fang Zhang & Hong Fang & Junjie Wu & Damian Ward, 2016. "Environmental Efficiency Analysis of Listed Cement Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Víctor Giménez García & Diego Prior Jiménez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina & Claudio Thieme, 2016. "Una comparación internacional de la eficiencia de sistemas educativos. Un enfoque dinámico para el periodo 2003-2012," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 11, in: José Manuel Cordero Ferrera & Rosa Simancas Rodríguez (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 11, edition 1, volume 11, chapter 36, pages 653-670, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3821-:d:1074209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.