IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p2986-d1060261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the Reform of the Transfer Tax System Affect Corporate Green Innovation—Evidence from China’s “BT to VAT” Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Qin

    (School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Kaili Yang

    (School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Xuhui Ding

    (School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

Taxation has long been an important tool for dealing with externalities, and studying whether tax policies can be linked to today’s green development trend can help macroeconomic decisions influence the green transformation of enterprises. The article uses the business tax to VAT reform (BT to VAT), the largest turnover tax reform in recent years that took place in China from 2012 to 2016, as an example. The policy effect model was constructed using the difference in difference method to explore the driving effect of the tax reform and related variables on corporate green innovation. The results show that the policy effect of tax reform can effectively promote an enterprise’s green innovation behavior, with the promotion effect on invention-based green patents being significantly higher than that on utility-based green patents; there is a certain time lag in the promotion of green innovation by the policy effect of tax reform, with a significant effect starting from the third year of the policy. The green innovation behavior of enterprises is influenced by the characteristics of enterprises, with a significant positive correlation with enterprise size and operating capacity. Green innovation behavior is influenced by the characteristics of enterprises and has a significant positive correlation with the size and operating capacity of enterprises. The implementation of the policy of ‘reducing taxes and fees’ is conducive to green innovation, and an effective tax reform should be formulated gradually in response to the national conditions and market situation; on the basis of quality assurance, unnecessary steps in the process of green patent application and approval should be reduced to improve the efficiency of green innovation; effective social supervision or the appropriate realization of corporate equity can be adopted to promote green innovation. Corporate equity to promote corporate green innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Qin & Kaili Yang & Xuhui Ding, 2023. "Can the Reform of the Transfer Tax System Affect Corporate Green Innovation—Evidence from China’s “BT to VAT” Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2986-:d:1060261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/2986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/2986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Ralf & de Preux, Laure B. & Wagner, Ulrich J., 2014. "The impact of a carbon tax on manufacturing: Evidence from microdata," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Mingliang Zhao & Yue Gao & Qing Liu & Wei Sun, 2022. "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Urban Green Total Factor Productivity and the Mechanism Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Zhou, Qianling & Li, Tao & Gong, Liutang, 2022. "The effect of tax incentives on energy intensity: Evidence from China's VAT reform," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Yu, Jinliang & Qi, Yu, 2022. "BT-to-VAT reform and firm productivity: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Andualem Telaye Mengistu & Pablo Benitez & Seneshaw Tamru & Haileselassie Medhin & Michael Toman, 2019. "Exploring Carbon Pricing in Developing Countries: A Macroeconomic Analysis in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Michalis Skordoulis & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos & Stamatiοs Ntanos & Spyros Galatsidas & Garyfallos Arabatzis & Miltiadis Chalikias & Petros Kalantonis, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Firm Strategy in the Relationship between Green Entrepreneurship, Green Innovation, and Competitive Advantage: The Case of Medium and Large-Sized Firms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Yu, Chin-Hsien & Wu, Xiuqin & Zhang, Dayong & Chen, Shi & Zhao, Jinsong, 2021. "Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Weijiang Liu & Yangyang Li & Tingting Liu & Min Liu & Hai Wei, 2021. "How to Promote Low-Carbon Economic Development? A Comprehensive Assessment of Carbon Tax Policy in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Haifeng Huang & Tao Wang & Zhichao Zhan, 2019. "From Business Tax to Value‐added Tax: The Effects of Reform on Chinese Transport Industry Firms," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 29(1), pages 158-176, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kong, Dongmin & Xiong, Mengxu & Qin, Ni, 2022. "Business Tax reform and CSR engagement: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Cui, Yadong & Jiang, Yaohui & Zhang, Zhaowen & Xu, Su, 2023. "Tax reduction, technological progress, and energy efficiency improvement: A quasi-natural experiment from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 618-633.
    3. Liu, Lihua & Cao, Lele & Cao, Yuqiang & Lu, Meiting & Shan, Yaowen, 2024. "VAT credit refunds and firm productivity: Evidence from China's VAT reform," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Li, Fan & Liu, Chengjun & Wang, Wenche, 2025. "The impact of value-added tax reform on small and medium-sized firm innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Muhammad Sadiq & Mei Kei Leong & Ansa Savad Salim & Zhou Jiayao, 2025. "Fostering entrepreneurial success through the predictive role of knowledge management, green creativity, green social behavior, dynamic capabilities, business environment and green service innovation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-27, December.
    6. Tan, Xiujie & Yan, Yaxue & Dong, Yuyang, 2022. "Peer effect in green credit induced green innovation: An empirical study from China's Green Credit Guidelines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Sujeeth Ungratwar & Dipasha Sharma & Satish Kumar, 2025. "Mapping the digital banking landscape: a multi-dimensional exploration of fintech, digital payments, and e-wallets, with insights into current scenarios and future research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Xu, Qi & Liu, Kui, 2024. "Hero or Devil: A comparison of different carbon tax policies for China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    9. Yongjian Wang & Fei Wang & Wenbo Li, 2023. "Effects of the Carbon Credit Policy on the Capital-Constrained Manufacturer’s Remanufacturing and Emissions Decisions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Wang, Yafei & Shi, Ming & Zhao, Zihan & Liu, Junnan & Zhang, Shiqiu, 2025. "How does green finance improve the total factor energy efficiency? Capturing the mediating role of green management innovation and embodied technological progress," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Ronaldo, Reza & Suryanto, Tulus, 2022. "Green finance and sustainability development goals in Indonesian Fund Village," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Wasi Ul Hassan Shah & Rizwana Yasmeen & Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu, 2023. "The Repercussions of Economic Growth, Industrialization, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology on Municipal Solid Waste: Evidence from OECD Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Li Chen & Fujia Li & Haonan Zhang & Hao Cheng, 2025. "Can Green Finance Policy Achieve Collaborative Governance of Air Pollution? Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Laeven, Luc & Popov, Alexander, 2023. "Carbon taxes and the geography of fossil lending," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Martinsson, Gustav & Sajtos, László & Strömberg, Per & Thomann, Christian, 2022. "Carbon Pricing and Firm-Level CO2 Abatement: Evidence from a Quarter of a Century-Long Panel," Misum Working Paper Series 2022-10, Stockholm School of Economics, Mistra Center for Sustainable Markets (Misum).
    16. Zhongju Liao & Yuhan Wu, 2025. "Formal institutions, informal institutions, and firms' environmental innovation: An application of the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 668-680, February.
    17. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Lou, Runchi & Wang, Keying, 2023. "How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the economy? Empirical evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 671-684.
    18. Ping Lin & Dixin Cai & Qingfeng Geng & Junbing Xu, 2025. "From Green to Gold: the cash management impact of China’s new diversified green finance policy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Cui, Xin & Wang, Chunfeng & Sensoy, Ahmet & Liao, Jing & Xie, Xiaochen, 2023. "Economic policy uncertainty and green innovation: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Dong, Xiao & Yu, Mingzhe, 2024. "Green bond issuance and green innovation: Evidence from China's energy industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2986-:d:1060261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.