IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2749-d1056037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework of New Poverty Decomposition: An Application to the Evolution of Income Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Feng

    (School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Zhe Zhao

    (School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Zhanhua Jia

    (School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Zhenxing Tian

    (Jilin Academy of Social Sciences, Changchun 130033, China)

  • Haiting Chen

    (School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

Abstract

Ending poverty in all its forms is the first of the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Therefore, it is of great significance to study poverty in the context of sustainable development. At present, the effect of income growth on poverty reduction is becoming less evident, whereas the effect of inhabitant heterogeneity on poverty reduction is becoming increasingly significant in China. Based on the original two-dimensional poverty decomposition of income growth and redistribution, this study introduces the heterogeneity effect to decompose rural poverty in China from three dimensions. It first decomposes the change in income distribution into mean, variance, and residual effects using counterfactual analysis. Then, it introduces the Foster–Greer–Thorbecke index decomposition to decompose China’s rural poverty under the different poverty line. In addition, this paper employs mathematical statistics to analyze the effects of poverty’s growth, dispersion, and heterogeneity. This study finds that the three-dimensional poverty decomposition method can measure the trajectory and trend of poverty more precisely and comprehensively. Moreover, it found that the contradiction between economic growth and poverty regression is due to the fact that the poverty reduction effect of the growth effect and the poverty alleviation effect of the discrete effect have asymmetrical characteristics, whereas the discrete effect and the heterogeneous effect have symmetrical characteristics; that is, the poverty reduction effect of income growth is insufficient to compensate for the poverty deepening effect brought about by the widening income gap, and that the heterogeneous poverty reduction effect plays an increasingly important role. Therefore, to prevent residents from falling back into poverty after being lifted out of it, we must reduce the widening income gap. Moreover, residents’ ability to reduce poverty on their own must be strengthened.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Feng & Zhe Zhao & Zhanhua Jia & Zhenxing Tian & Haiting Chen, 2023. "Framework of New Poverty Decomposition: An Application to the Evolution of Income Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2749-:d:1056037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foster, James & Greer, Joel & Thorbecke, Erik, 1984. "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 761-766, May.
    2. Ismaila Rimi Abubakar, 2022. "Multidimensional Poverty among Nigerian Households: Sustainable Development Implications," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 993-1014, November.
    3. Dan Brockington, 2012. "A Radically Conservative Vision? The Challenge of UNEP's Towards a Green Economy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 409-422, January.
    4. Dominique Thon, 1979. "On Measuring Poverty," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 25(4), pages 429-439, December.
    5. Sen, Amartya K, 1976. "Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(2), pages 219-231, March.
    6. repec:bla:revinw:v:46:y:2000:i:2:p:139-59 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. David H. Autor & Lawrence F. Katz & Melissa S. Kearney, 2005. "Rising Wage Inequality: The Role of Composition and Prices," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 2096, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
    8. Fuwa, Nobuhiko, 2000. "The Poverty and Heterogeneity Among Female-Headed Households Revisited: The Case of Panama," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 1515-1542, August.
    9. Thomas Lemieux, 2006. "Increasing Residual Wage Inequality: Composition Effects, Noisy Data, or Rising Demand for Skill?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 461-498, June.
    10. Buvinic, Mayra & Gupta, Geeta Rao, 1997. "Female-Headed Households and Female-Maintained Families: Are They Worth Targeting to Reduce Poverty in Developing Countries?," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 259-280, January.
    11. repec:bla:revinw:v:25:y:1979:i:4:p:429-39 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Gary S. Fields & Gyeongjoon Yoo, 2000. "Falling Labor Income Inequality In Korea'S Economic Growth: Patterns And Underlying Causes," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 46(2), pages 139-159, June.
    13. Ravallion, M. & Datt, G., 1991. "Growth and Redistribution Components of Changes in Poverty Measures," Papers 83, World Bank - Living Standards Measurement.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Hao Chen & Jean-Yves Duclos, 2011. "Testing for poverty dominance: an application to Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(3), pages 781-803, August.
    2. Núñez Velázquez, José Javier, 2009. "Estado actual y nuevas aproximaciones a la medición de la pobreza/Current Status and New Approaches to the Measurement of Poverty," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 27, pages 325-346, Agosto.
    3. Espinoza-Delgado, José & Klasen, Stephan, 2018. "Gender and multidimensional poverty in Nicaragua: An individual based approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 466-491.
    4. Suman Seth and Gaston Yalonetzky, 2018. "Assessing Deprivation with Ordinal Variables: Depth Sensitivity and Poverty Aversion," OPHI Working Papers ophiwp123.pdf, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    5. Jean–Yves Duclos & Phillipe Grégoire, 2002. "Absolute and Relative Deprivation and the Measurement of Poverty," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 48(4), pages 471-492, December.
    6. Zheng, Buhong, 2001. "Statistical inference for poverty measures with relative poverty lines," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 337-356, April.
    7. Fujii, Tomoki, 2017. "Dynamic Poverty Decomposition Analysis: An Application to the Philippines," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 69-84.
    8. Canagarajan, Sudharshan & Ngwafon, John & Thomas, Saji, 1997. "The evolution of poverty and welfare in Nigeria, 1985-92," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1715, The World Bank.
    9. Kuan Xu & Zhengxi Lin, 2007. "Participation in Employer-sponsored Training in Canada: Role of Firm Characteristics and Worker Attributes," Working Papers daleconwp2007-02, Dalhousie University, Department of Economics.
    10. K. Mosler & C. Scheicher, 2008. "Attenuation of relative poverty by taxes and subsidies," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 265-283.
    11. Bibi, Sami & Duclos, Jean-Yves, 2007. "Equity and policy effectiveness with imperfect targeting," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 109-140, May.
    12. Kraay, Aart C. & Lakner, Christoph & Ozler, Berk & Decerf, Benoit Marie A & Jolliffe, Dean Mitchell & Sterck,Olivier & Yonzan, Nishant, 2023. "A New Distribution Sensitive Index for Measuring Welfare, Poverty, and Inequality," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10470, The World Bank.
    13. Lars Osberg & Kuan Xu, 1999. "Poverty Intensity: How Well Do Canadian Provinces Compare?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 25(2), pages 179-195, June.
    14. Michal Brzezinski, 2011. "Accounting for recent trends in absolute poverty in Poland: a decomposition analysis," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 465-475, December.
    15. Arthur Charpentier & Stéphane Mussard, 2011. "Income inequality games," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(4), pages 529-554, December.
    16. Paul Makdissi & Yves Groleau, 2002. "Que pouvons-nous apprendre des profils de pauvreté canadiens?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 78(2), pages 257-286.
    17. Suman Seth & Gaston Yalonetzky, 2021. "Assessing Deprivation with an Ordinal Variable: Theory and Application to Sanitation Deprivation in Bangladesh," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(3), pages 793-811.
    18. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp068 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Albarrán, Pedro & Ortuño, Ignacio & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2011. "The measurement of low- and high-impact in citation distributions: Technical results," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 48-63.
    20. Tomasz Panek, 2019. "Czy wzrost gospodarczy w Polsce w latach 2005 -2015 był korzystny dla ubogich?," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 5-39.
    21. Gudeta Alemu Zerihun, 2015. "Working Paper - 220 - Developing a Food (in) Security Map for South Africa," Working Paper Series 2158, African Development Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2749-:d:1056037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.