IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15496-d1271851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consequences of Psychological Benefits in the Context of Eco-Friendly Indoor Smart Farm Restaurants: The Moderating Role of Curiosity

Author

Listed:
  • Kyuhyeon Joo

    (The College of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

  • Heather Markham Kim

    (The College of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

  • Jinsoo Hwang

    (The College of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study was designed in order to understand the psychological benefits of an indoor smart farm restaurant, which is a restaurant that operates a smart farm inside the restaurant. The study more specifically proposes a conceptual framework that includes psychological benefits, attitudes, and future engagement. In addition, this study investigated whether the impact of psychological benefits on attitude is moderated by curiosity. The data was collected from 317 participants in South Korea. The results revealed that warm glow, nature experiences, and self-expressive benefits positively influenced attitude. Also, attitude, warm glow, and self-expressive benefits significantly affected future engagement. Lastly, the effect of psychological benefits on attitudes is moderated by curiosity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyuhyeon Joo & Heather Markham Kim & Jinsoo Hwang, 2023. "Consequences of Psychological Benefits in the Context of Eco-Friendly Indoor Smart Farm Restaurants: The Moderating Role of Curiosity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15496-:d:1271851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15496/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15496/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amihai Glazer & Kai A. Konrad, 2008. "A Signaling Explanation for Charity," Springer Books, in: Roger D. Congleton & Kai A. Konrad & Arye L. Hillman (ed.), 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking 2, pages 713-722, Springer.
    2. Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, 1991. "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(4), pages 1039-1061.
    3. Revels, Janeaya & Tojib, Dewi & Tsarenko, Yelena, 2010. "Understanding consumer intention to use mobile services," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 74-80.
    4. Arun T. M. & Puneet Kaur & Alberto Ferraris & Amandeep Dhir, 2021. "What motivates the adoption of green restaurant products and services? A systematic review and future research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2224-2240, May.
    5. Jinsoo Hwang & Hyunjoon Kim, 2021. "Examining the Importance of Green Food in the Restaurant Industry: Focusing on Behavioral Intentions to Eat Insects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Seong-Hee Park & Daniel F. Mahony & Yukyoum Kim & Young Do Kim, 2015. "Curiosity generating advertisements and their impact on sport consumer behavior," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 359-369, July.
    7. Heather Markham Kim & In-Hye Lee & Kyuhyeon Joo & JungHoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2022. "Psychological Benefits of Purchasing Home Meal Replacement in the Context of Eco-Friendly TV Home Shopping Broadcast: The Moderating Role of Personal Norm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Siti Fatimahwati Pehin Dato Musa & Khairul Hidayatullah Basir & Edna Luah, 2022. "The Role of Smart Farming in Sustainable Development," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Andreoni, James, 1990. "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(401), pages 464-477, June.
    10. Nunes, Paulo A. L. D. & Schokkaert, Erik, 2003. "Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 231-245, March.
    11. Edell, Julie A & Burke, Marian Chapman, 1987. "The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(3), pages 421-433, December.
    12. Kyuhyeon Joo & Junghoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2022. "NAM and TPB Approach to Consumers’ Decision-Making Framework in the Context of Indoor Smart Farm Restaurants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Raza & Lu Hongliang & Zhu Yue & Tingyu Yang & Nian Wei, 2025. "Environmental regulations and eco-innovation as catalysts for green agricultural practices: insights from Pakistan–China agricultural cooperation," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-32, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keval Amin & Erica Harris, 2022. "The Effect of Investor Sentiment on Nonprofit Donations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 427-450, January.
    2. Clark, Jeremy & Friesen, Lana, 2008. "The causes of order effects in contingent valuation surveys: An experimental investigation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 195-206, September.
    3. Ying-Kai Liao & Wann-Yih Wu & Thi-That Pham, 2020. "Examining the Moderating Effects of Green Marketing and Green Psychological Benefits on Customers’ Green Attitude, Value and Purchase Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Jinsoo Hwang & Jung Kyu Choi, 2017. "An Investigation of Passengers’ Psychological Benefits from Green Brands in an Environmentally Friendly Airline Context: The Moderating Role of Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. David A. Comerford & Nick Hanley, 2017. "The External Validity of Consequential Stated Preference Studies: a comment," Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2017-02, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development.
    6. repec:esx:essedp:762 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jochimsen, Beate, 2019. "Christmas lights in Berlin: New empirical evidence for the private provision of a public good," FiFo Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 19-04, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    8. Anya Savikhin & Roman Sheremeta, 2010. "Visibility of Contributions and Cost of Information: An Experiment on Public Goods," Working Papers 10-22, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    9. Sébastien Foudi, 2024. "Are risk attitude, impatience, and impulsivity related to the individual discount rate? Evidence from energy-efficient durable goods," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(4), pages 627-661, June.
    10. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2013. "Image concerns and the provision of quality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Kellner, Christian & Reinstein, David & Riener, Gerhard & Sanders, Michael, 2015. "Giving and Probability," Economics Discussion Papers 13794, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    12. Emrah Arbak & Marie Claire Villeval, 2006. "Endogenous Leadership Selection and Influence," Post-Print halshs-00175479, HAL.
    13. Sofia Lundberg & Per-Olov Marklund & Elon Strömbäck, 2016. "Is Environmental Policy by Public Procurement Effective?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 44(4), pages 478-499, July.
    14. Stefano Barbieri & David A. Malueg, 2014. "Increasing Fundraising Success by Decreasing Donor Choice," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 16(3), pages 372-400, June.
    15. Romano, Richard & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2001. "Why charities announce donations: a positive perspective," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 423-447, September.
    16. Fiedler, Susann & Hillenbrand, Adrian, 2020. "Gain-loss framing in interdependent choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 232-251.
    17. Martin Korndörfer & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2015. "A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior," Working Papers 1601, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    18. Simon Gaechter, 2006. "Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications," Discussion Papers 2006-03, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    19. Fang, Xing, 2022. "Why we hide good deeds? The selfless and anonymous donation behavior in crowdfunding," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Luigi Di Gaetano & Isidoro Mazza, 2017. "“Better an egg today than a hen tomorrow” on the implications of deaccess policies for donations to museums," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(3), pages 237-258, August.
    21. Thomas A. Garrett & Russell M. Rhine, 2007. "Does government spending really crowd out charitable contributions? new time series evidence," Working Papers 2007-012, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15496-:d:1271851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.