IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10036-d1178849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Enterprise Digital Transformation on Green Technology Innovation: A Quantitative Study on Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Tang

    (School of Business, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)

  • Haifeng Jiang

    (School of Business, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)

  • Shanshan Hou

    (School of Marxism, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)

  • Jun Zheng

    (School of Accountancy, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Lianqi Miao

    (School of Business, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Promoting enterprise digital transformation is of great significance in accelerating the innovation capability of green technology and boosting green and low-carbon economic development. Therefore, based on the textual analysis of enterprise annual reports, the measurement index of enterprise digital transformation was constructed, and combined with the data of listed, A-share companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2011 to 2021, a quantitative study was conducted on the relationship between enterprise digital transformation and green technology innovation. The quantitative study shows that there is a significant positive correlation between enterprise digital transformation and green technology innovation. The CEO IT background plays a positive moderating role between digital transformation and green technology innovation in enterprises. Based on the quantitative study from the perspective of fiscal incentives, it was found that different fiscal incentive policies play different roles in an enterprises’ digital transformation and green technology innovation; that is, government subsidies play an intermediary role between the two, and tax preferences play a positive moderating role between the two. This research enriches the mechanism analysis between enterprise digital transformation and green technology innovation, and it provides a useful exploration for the further promotion of both enterprise digital transformation and green technology innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Tang & Haifeng Jiang & Shanshan Hou & Jun Zheng & Lianqi Miao, 2023. "The Effect of Enterprise Digital Transformation on Green Technology Innovation: A Quantitative Study on Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10036-:d:1178849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10036/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10036/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Canchu & Kunnathur, Anand, 2019. "Strategic orientations, developmental culture, and big data capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 49-60.
    2. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Hanel, Petr & Rosa, Julio Miguel, 2011. "Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 217-229, March.
    3. Zhuo, Chengfeng & Chen, Jin, 2023. "Can digital transformation overcome the enterprise innovation dilemma: Effect, mechanism and effective boundary," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Shang, Yuping & Raza, Syed Ali & Huo, Zhe & Shahzad, Umer & Zhao, Xin, 2023. "Does enterprise digital transformation contribute to the carbon emission reduction? Micro-level evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Xia, Li & Gao, Shuo & Wei, Jiuchang & Ding, Qiying, 2022. "Government subsidy and corporate green innovation - Does board governance play a role?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Long Xue & Qianyu Zhang & Xuemang Zhang & Chengyu Li, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Zhang, Zhengyi & Jin, Jun & Li, Shijing & Zhang, Yuanmin, 2023. "Digital transformation of incumbent firms from the perspective of portfolios of innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Bianchi, Mattia & Murtinu, Samuele & Scalera, Vittoria G., 2019. "R&D Subsidies as Dual Signals in Technological Collaborations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    9. Liu, Guangqiang & Wang, Shenghua, 2023. "Digital transformation and trade credit provision: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1546 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Shengzhong Zhang & Yingmin Yu & Qihong Zhu & Chun Martin Qiu & Aixuan Tian, 2020. "Green Innovation Mode under Carbon Tax and Innovation Subsidy: An Evolutionary Game Analysis for Portfolio Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Hall, Bronwyn & Van Reenen, John, 2000. "How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 449-469, April.
    13. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Ziqing He & Qin Liu, 2023. "The Crossover Cooperation Mode and Mechanism of Green Innovation between Manufacturing and Internet Enterprises in Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, February.
    15. Arthur Lewbel, 1997. "Constructing Instruments for Regressions with Measurement Error when no Additional Data are Available, with an Application to Patents and R&D," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1201-1214, September.
    16. Baumann, Julian & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2016. "The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1263-1274.
    17. Xiaojun Sun & Jing Tang & Shilong Li, 2022. "Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Long Xue & Xuemang Zhang, 2022. "Can Digital Financial Inclusion Promote Green Innovation in Heavily Polluting Companies?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Guo, Junyan & Fang, Hanqing & Liu, Xuexin & Wang, Cizhi & Wang, Yuan, 2023. "FinTech and financing constraints of enterprises: Evidence from China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Wang, Quan-Jing & Tang, Kai & Hu, Hai-Qing, 2022. "The impact of digital finance on green innovation: Evidence from provinces in China," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    21. Samuel Wicki & Erik G. Hansen, 2019. "Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 970-988, September.
    22. Tao Zhang & Zhan-Zhong Shi & Yi-Rong Shi & Neng-Jun Chen, 2022. "Enterprise digital transformation and production efficiency: mechanism analysis and empirical research," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 2781-2792, December.
    23. Weiting Zheng & Kulwant Singh & Will Mitchell, 2015. "Buffering and enabling: The impact of interlocking political ties on firm survival and sales growth," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(11), pages 1615-1636, November.
    24. Heath, Chip & Tversky, Amos, 1991. "Preference and Belief: Ambiguity and Competence in Choice under Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 5-28, January.
    25. Yingyuan Guo & Xingneng Xia & Sheng Zhang & Danping Zhang, 2018. "Environmental Regulation, Government R&D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng Liang & Xinhui Sun, 2024. "Does digital transformation promote the green innovation of China’s listed companies?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 22199-22235, September.
    2. Huiting Guo & Rui Qiu & Yapeng Li, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Digital Transformation Network Peer Groups on Corporate Carbon Neutrality Performance: Based on the Interlocking Directorate Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Jianfei He & Rong Huang & Jiayu Ding & Yuting Liu & Rongxi Zhou, 2024. "The Impact of Capital Market Opening on Enterprise Green Technology Innovation: Insights from the Shanghai–Hong Kong Stock Connect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Limin Zou & Wan Li & Hongyi Wu & Jiawen Liu & Peng Gao, 2024. "Measuring Corporate Digital Transformation: Methodology, Indicators and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Yanfei Wu & Irina Ivashkovskaya & Galina Besstremyannaya & Chunfeng Liu, 2025. "Unlocking Green Innovation Potential Amidst Digital Transformation Challenges—The Evidence from ESG Transformation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-30, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shu & Zhang, Xiaoyun, 2025. "Can digital transformation of enterprise improve the information environment of the capital market? ——Evidence from Analyst's perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Guo, Panting & Bi, Jiefeng & Zhu, Mengnan, 2025. "Enterprise digital transformation and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from listed enterprises in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Ziyang Shi & Danxue Fan, 2025. "Dual Mechanisms of Digital Transformation in Sustaining Green Innovation: A Supply Chain Perspective on Capability–Motivation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-34, October.
    4. Chenshuo Li & Shihan Feng & Qingyu Yuan & Jiahui Wei & Shiqi Wang & Dongdong Huang, 2025. "The Impact of Preferential Policy on Corporate Green Innovation: A Resource Dependence Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Xihui Chen & Juan Ou & Xuemei Tang & Qinghe Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Officials’ Off-Office Accountability Audit of Natural Resource Assets on Firms’ Green Innovation Strategies: A Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-36, February.
    6. Fu, Shuke & Ge, Yingchen & Hao, Yu & Peng, Jiachao & Tian, Jiali, 2024. "Energy supply chain efficiency in the digital era: Evidence from China's listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Dimos, Christos & Pugh, Geoff & Hisarciklilar, Mehtap & Talam, Ema & Jackson, Ian, 2022. "The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative meta-regression analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Fu, Chao & Luo, Dianying & Zhang, Jiaoshu & Li, Wenxia, 2025. "Tax incentives, marketization level, and corporate digital transformation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Tian, Binbin & Yu, Baixue & Chen, Shi & Ye, Jingjing, 2020. "Tax incentive, R&D investment and firm innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Siying Long & Zhongju Liao, 2021. "Are fiscal policy incentives effective in stimulating firms' eco‐product innovation? The moderating role of dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3095-3104, November.
    11. Ying Wu & Yuanyue Deng, 2024. "Does digital transformation crowd out the employment of lower skill labor?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(3), pages 726-748, July.
    12. Lee, Daeyong, 2018. "Impact of the excise tax on firm R&D and performance in the medical device industry: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 854-871.
    13. Zheng, Deyuan & Song, Hang & Zhao, Chunguang & Liu, Yujiao & Zhao, Wenhao, 2024. "Is it possible for semiconductor companies to reduce carbon emissions through digital transformation? Evidence from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    14. Cameron Hepburn & Jacquelyn Pless & David Popp, 2018. "Policy Brief—Encouraging Innovation that Protects Environmental Systems: Five Policy Proposals," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 154-169.
    15. Xiaoyuan Gao & Yixin Zhao, 2023. "Does intellectual property protection promote green innovation in firms? A perspective on R&D spillovers and financing constraints," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Gao, Xue & Zhang, Fang & Jiang, Siyang, 2025. "Adapting to policy changes: How firms' R&D responses affect their performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    17. Zhao, Shuang & Zhang, Liqun & Peng, Lin & Zhou, Haiyan & Hu, Feng, 2024. "Enterprise pollution reduction through digital transformation? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Charles Bérubé & Pierre Mohnen, 2009. "Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 206-225, February.
    19. Emmanuel Chavez, 2020. "The Effects of R&D Tax Credits and Subsidies onPrivate R&D in Mexico (Chapter 2)," PSE Working Papers halshs-02652063, HAL.
    20. Tao Qian & Yutao Zhan & Shiyuan Pan, 2023. "Can the Super‐deduction of R&D Expenses Boost R&D Investment?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(5), pages 135-160, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10036-:d:1178849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.