IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4156-d1079855.html

The Crossover Cooperation Mode and Mechanism of Green Innovation between Manufacturing and Internet Enterprises in Digital Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Ziqing He

    (School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Qin Liu

    (School of Entrepreneurship, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Under the background of the digital economy, manufacturing seeks to improve green manufacturing and the level of greenness of products through digital empowerment. However, there exists a certain degree of technical difficulty and cost pressures for independent transformation to enhance green innovation performance through digitalization. How to conduct crossover cooperation with Internet enterprises needs to be explored. Taking automobile manufacturing enterprises as the case background, this paper constructs an evolutionary game model of green innovation crossover cooperation between traditional automobile manufacturing and Internet enterprises in the context of carbon credit policy. From the perspective of the extra effort cost of manufacturing enterprises and the excess income of Internet enterprises, this paper analyzes the mode selection strategy of green innovation crossover cooperation between the two types of subjects, and also analyzes the crossover cooperation mechanism of green innovation from three aspects: income distribution mechanism, carbon credit trading mechanism, and R&D subsidy mechanism. The results show that (1) Reducing the cost of digital green innovation transformation in manufacturing and the excess returns obtained under the free-riding behavior of Internet enterprises will help promote in-depth cooperation among crossover entities. (2) The benefit distribution dominated by manufacturing enterprises is helpful to evolve toward the direction of the alliance cooperative innovation mode and improve the benefits of green innovation cooperation. (3) Under the government’s single weak intervention management mechanism, optimizing carbon credit accounting and assessment standards can effectively guide manufacturers and Internet companies to conduct alliance green innovation cooperation, but they still need to be matched with appropriate R&D subsidies to form a compound strong intervention guidance mechanism to obtain higher social and ecological benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziqing He & Qin Liu, 2023. "The Crossover Cooperation Mode and Mechanism of Green Innovation between Manufacturing and Internet Enterprises in Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4156-:d:1079855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weimin Ma & Ranran Zhang & Shiwei Chai, 2019. "What Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretic Analysis of Government Subsidy and Cooperation Contract," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Yingying Sun & Kexin Bi & Shi Yin, 2020. "Measuring and Integrating Risk Management into Green Innovation Practices for Green Manufacturing under the Global Value Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-33, January.
    3. Jason Hickel & Giorgos Kallis, 2020. "Is Green Growth Possible?," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 469-486, June.
    4. Xiaojun Sun & Jing Tang & Shilong Li, 2022. "Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Xiaobo Han & Yin Han & Rong Ke & Jinghua Zhao, 2022. "Research on the Cooperation Model of New Energy Vehicle Supply Chain under the Background of Government Subsidies Declining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Yuanyuan Xu & Xiuyan Ma & Gengui Zhou, 2022. "Coordination of Automobile Supply Chain Considering Relative Endurance Level under the Dual-Credit Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Sufeng Li & Chenxin Dong & Lei Yang & Xinpeng Gao & Wei Wei & Ming Zhao & Weiqi Xia, 2022. "Research on Evolutionary Game Strategy Selection and Simulation Research of Carbon Emission Reduction of Government and Enterprises under the “Dual Carbon” Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Xiaowen Zhu & Jinrong He & Jingru Li & Xiang Liu & Yicheng Huang & Qiong Shen, 2022. "What Is the Mechanism of Government Green Development Behavior Considering Multi-Agent Interaction? A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Die Hu & Lu Qiu & Maoyan She & Yu Wang, 2021. "Sustaining the sustainable development: How do firms turn government green subsidies into financial performance through green innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2271-2292, July.
    10. Yan Li & Yi Shi, 2022. "Dynamic Game Analysis of Enterprise Green Technology Innovation Ecosystem under Double Environmental Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-33, September.
    11. Suh, Yongyoon & Woo, Chulwan & Koh, Jinhwan & Jeon, Jeonghwan, 2019. "Analysing the satisfaction of university–industry cooperation efforts based on the Kano model: A Korean case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Xie, Xuemei & Fang, Liangxiu & Zeng, Saixing, 2016. "Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: A fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5210-5215.
    13. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Salerno, Mario Sergio & Ikenami, Rodrigo Kazuo, 2018. "Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-48.
    14. Weiling Wang & Yongjian Wang & Xiaoqing Zhang & Dalin Zhang, 2021. "Effects of Government Subsidies on Production and Emissions Reduction Decisions under Carbon Tax Regulation and Consumer Low-Carbon Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Sen, Burak & Noori, Mehdi & Tatari, Omer, 2017. "Will Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standard help? Modeling CAFE's impact on market share of electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 279-287.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang Ma & Weiqiang Hu & Ru Liang, 2024. "The Impact of the Industrial Internet on the Innovation and Development Level of China’s Manufacturing Industry: Under the Perspective of Government Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Janik, Agnieszka & Ryszko, Adam, 2025. "Open innovation and environmental sustainability–A systematic literature review from the firm-level perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Gong Zhang & Shulei Bi, 2024. "Evolutionary game analysis of online game studios and online game companies participating in the virtual economy of online games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Liang Tang & Haifeng Jiang & Shanshan Hou & Jun Zheng & Lianqi Miao, 2023. "The Effect of Enterprise Digital Transformation on Green Technology Innovation: A Quantitative Study on Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Licheng Yang & Shijie Song & Chunlin Liu, 2024. "Green signals: The impact of environmental protection support policies on firms' green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3258-3278, May.
    2. Shanshan Gao & Wenqi Li & Jiayi Meng & Jianfeng Shi & Jianhua Zhu, 2023. "A Study on the Impact Mechanism of Digitalization on Corporate Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Hanyuan Liang & Guangliang Li & Weikun Zhang & Zhe Chen, 2022. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Enterprise Performance: The Regulatory Role of Government Grants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Deng, Qinwen & Long, Yue, 2025. "Symbiotic evolution in regional green innovation ecosystems: A Lotka-Volterra model analysis of China's provincial," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    5. Hua Feng & Fengyan Wang & Guomin Song & Lanlan Liu, 2022. "Digital Transformation on Enterprise Green Innovation: Effect and Transmission Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-31, August.
    6. Nadezhda Kvasha & Olga Bolotnikova & Ekaterina Malevskaia-Malevich, 2023. "Biotechnological Basis of the Pulp and Paper Industry Circular Economic System," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Nusirat Ojuolape Gold & Fauziah Md. Taib & Yaxin Ma, 2022. "Firm-Level Attributes, Industry-Specific Factors, Stakeholder Pressure, and Country-Level Attributes: Global Evidence of What Inspires Corporate Sustainability Practices and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Deyan Yang & Jinyong Wang & Dongping Song, 2019. "Channel Structure Strategies of Supply Chains with Varying Green Cost and Governmental Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Yongjian Wang & Fei Wang & Wenbo Li, 2023. "Effects of the Carbon Credit Policy on the Capital-Constrained Manufacturer’s Remanufacturing and Emissions Decisions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Xueyang Wang & Xiumei Sun & Haotian Zhang & Chaokai Xue, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Urban Green Innovation CA-Pability: Based on Panel Data of 274 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Gray, Ian & Barral, Stephanie, 2021. "A (rapid) climate audit of economic sociology," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 22(3), pages 4-9.
    12. Risa Arai & Martin Calisto Friant & Walter J. V. Vermeulen, 2024. "The Japanese Circular Economy and Sound Material-Cycle Society Policies: Discourse and Policy Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 619-650, March.
    13. Castro, Damaris & Bleys, Brent, 2023. "Do people think they have enough? A subjective income sufficiency assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    14. Corsi, G. & Guarino, R. & Muñoz-Ulecia, E. & Grande, U. & Buonocore, E. & Sapio, A. & Franzese, P.P., 2026. "Has “Ecological Economics” betrayed its roots? Revealing its state, internal tensions and evolution through a multi-level and multi-scale bibliometric assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    15. Huwe, Vera & Steitz, Janek & Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa, 2022. "Kommunale Klimaschutzinvestitionen und deren Finanzierung: Eine Fallstudienanalyse," Papers 277902, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    16. Crettez, Bertrand & Hayek, Naila & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "When is frugality optimal?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 65-75.
    17. Qin, Yao & Zhang, Hongmei & Liang, Wei, 2025. "Can dual-pilot policy of innovative city and carbon trading promote carbon productivity? Empirical evidence from dual-pilot city in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Samuel Fekiač & Iveta Hajdúchová & Roman Dudík & Kim Hortenská & Martin Halász, 2025. "Proposal of a conceptual framework for creating a model for the implementation of green growth indicators in the conditions of the Slovak Republic," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(8), pages 373-383.
    19. Simon Gorecki & Jalal Possik & Gregory Zacharewicz & Yves Ducq & Nicolas Perry, 2020. "A Multicomponent Distributed Framework for Smart Production System Modeling and Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Choi, Kwang Hun & Kwon, Gyu Hyun, 2023. "Strategies for sensing innovation opportunities in smart grids: In the perspective of interactive relationships between science, technology, and business," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4156-:d:1079855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.