IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9422-d1169128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indicators, Strategies, and Rule Settings for Sustainable Public–Private Infrastructure Partnerships: From Literature Review towards Institutional Designs

Author

Listed:
  • Abimbola A. Adebayo

    (CSTM Governance and Technology for Sustainability, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Kris Lulofs

    (CSTM Governance and Technology for Sustainability, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Michiel Adriaan Heldeweg

    (CSTM Governance and Technology for Sustainability, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Public–private partnerships (PPPs)-driven infrastructure projects frequently disappoint in terms of sustainability outcomes. This paper substantiates this. It develops and presents an institutional design that can integrate environmental and social sustainability principles into PPP infrastructure projects (sustainable PPPs). The institutional design includes principles for the planning processes (preparation, procurement, contracting) and outcome indicators. The paper builds upon and synthesizes extant research through a literature review that employs the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statements. The review covers the appropriateness of the used indicators for the investigation and measurement of environmental and social sustainability policy strategies designed to enhance sustainability and institutional intercalation. About the latter, a specific lens to focus on the relationships between the institutional design characteristics (the rule settings) of planning processes and the sustainability outcomes is developed based on three variables within the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework of Ostrom. Consequently, rule settings that enable the investigation of the institutional process preconditions for sustainable PPPs and the evaluation of the sustainability outcomes are amalgamated. Our study indicates that the IAD framework provides a useful theoretical lens to harmonize and categorize process principles to achieve the rule settings that guide involved actors towards sustainable PPPs and place lenses on the envisioned environmental and social sustainability outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Abimbola A. Adebayo & Kris Lulofs & Michiel Adriaan Heldeweg, 2023. "Indicators, Strategies, and Rule Settings for Sustainable Public–Private Infrastructure Partnerships: From Literature Review towards Institutional Designs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9422-:d:1169128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9422/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9422/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuemei Bai & Richard J. Dawson & Diana Ürge-Vorsatz & Gian C. Delgado & Aliyu Salisu Barau & Shobhakar Dhakal & David Dodman & Lykke Leonardsen & Valérie Masson-Delmotte & Debra C. Roberts & Seth Schu, 2018. "Six research priorities for cities and climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 555(7694), pages 23-25, March.
    2. Nizkorodov, Evgenia, 2021. "Evaluating risk allocation and project impacts of sustainability-oriented water public–private partnerships in Southern California: A comparative case analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Guang-Xin Gao, 2018. "Sustainable Winner Determination for Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in Multi-Attribute Reverse Auctions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Madeleine Hoeft & Marianne Pieper & Kent Eriksson & Hans-Joachim Bargstädt, 2021. "Toward Life Cycle Sustainability in Infrastructure: The Role of Automation and Robotics in PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Zeeshan Khan & Muhsin Ali & Dervis Kirikkaleli & Salman Wahab & Zhilun Jiao, 2020. "The impact of technological innovation and public‐private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption‐based carbon emissions analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1317-1330, September.
    7. Nilesh Agarchand Patil & Nicola Thounaojam & Boeing Laishram, 2021. "Enhancing sustainability of Indian PPP procurement process using system dynamics model," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(4), pages 345-369, August.
    8. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    9. Crawford, Sue E. S. & Ostrom, Elinor, 1995. "A Grammar of Institutions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(3), pages 582-600, September.
    10. Katharina Spraul & Julia Thaler, 2020. "Partnering for good? An analysis of how to achieve sustainability-related outcomes in public–private partnerships," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 485-511, July.
    11. Cole, Daniel H., 2017. "Laws, norms, and the Institutional Analysis and Development framework," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 829-847, December.
    12. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Raghutla, Chandrashekar & Song, Malin & Zameer, Hashim & Jiao, Zhilun, 2020. "Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: The role of technological innovations in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Jingfeng Yuan & Wei Li & Jiyue Guo & Xianbo Zhao & Mirosław J. Skibniewski, 2018. "Social Risk Factors of Transportation PPP Projects in China: A Sustainable Development Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Vin Spoann & Takeshi Fujiwara & Bandith Seng & Chanthy Lay & Mongtoeun Yim, 2019. "Assessment of Public–Private Partnership in Municipal Solid Waste Management in Phnom Penh, Cambodia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Pascual Berrone & Joan Enric Ricart & Ana Isabel Duch & Valeria Bernardo & Jordi Salvador & Juan Piedra Peña & Miquel Rodríguez Planas, 2019. "EASIER: An Evaluation Model for Public–Private Partnerships Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    16. Nan He & Yijing Li & Huimin Li & Ziqi Liu & Chengyi Zhang, 2020. "Critical Factors to Achieve Sustainability of Public-Private Partnership Projects in the Water Sector: A Stakeholder-Oriented Network Perspective," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-17, November.
    17. Axel Marx, 2019. "Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Exploring Their Design and Its Impact on Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Han Zhang & Hujun Li & Xiaosu Ye, 2023. "Research on the Influences of Task Interdependence on Team Performance in the Context of the Leader–Member Exchange Differentiation in the Public–Private Partnership Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Li & Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Salem, Sultan & Irfan, Muhammad & Alvarado, Rafael & Lv, Kangjuan, 2022. "How technological innovation and institutional quality affect sectoral energy consumption in Pakistan? Fresh policy insights from novel econometric approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Monica-Lavinia DAN, 2022. "The Impact Of Public-Private Partnership In The Energy Field On Economic Growth," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 54(1(63)), pages 24-33, June.
    3. Melanie Zurba & Dominic Stucker & Grace Mwaura & Catie Burlando & Archi Rastogi & Shalini Dhyani & Rebecca Koss, 2020. "Intergenerational Dialogue, Collaboration, Learning, and Decision-Making in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the IUCN Intergenerational Partnership for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Yang, Qiang & Huo, Jiale & Saqib, Najia & Mahmood, Haider, 2022. "Modelling the effect of renewable energy and public-private partnership in testing EKC hypothesis: Evidence from methods moment of quantile regression," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 485-494.
    5. Stella Pfisterer & Rob Van Tulder, 2020. "Navigating Governance Tensions to Enhance the Impact of Partnerships with the Private Sector for the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    7. Li Chunling & Javed Ahmed Memon & Tiep Le Thanh & Minhaj Ali & Dervis Kirikkaleli, 2021. "The Impact of Public-Private Partnership Investment in Energy and Technological Innovation on Ecological Footprint: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Nannan Wang & Minxun Ma, 2021. "Public–private partnership as a tool for sustainable development – What literatures say?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 243-258, January.
    9. Zhang, Xiaofeng & Chen, Xinnan & Fang, Zheng & Zhu, Yujuan & Liang, Jiabo, 2022. "Investment in energy resources, natural resources and environment: Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Terence Fell & Johanna Mattsson, 2021. "The Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Housing as a Potential Contributor to Sustainable Cities and Communities: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Liguo, Xin & Ahmad, Manzoor & Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal, 2022. "Impact of innovation in marine energy generation, distribution, or transmission-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    12. Olivera Kostoska & Ljupco Kocarev, 2019. "A Novel ICT Framework for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, April.
    13. María Huertas González-Serrano & Vicente Añó Sanz & Rómulo Jacobo González-García, 2020. "Sustainable Sport Entrepreneurship and Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis of This Emerging Field of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    14. David M. Herold & Ki-Hoon Lee, 2017. "The Influence of the Sustainability Logic on Carbon Disclosure in the Global Logistics Industry: The Case of DHL, FDX and UPS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Afshan, Sahar & Li, Claire J., 2023. "Do climate technologies and recycling asymmetrically mitigate consumption-based carbon emissions in the United States? New insights from Quantile ARDL," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    16. Yu, Siming & Wan, Kang & Cai, Cheng & Xu, Lingli & Zhao, Tuanjie, 2023. "Resource curse and green growth in China: Role of energy transitions under COP26 declarations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    17. Yuanli Li & Pengcheng Xiang & Kairui You & Jin Guo & Zhaowen Liu & Hong Ren, 2021. "Identifying the Key Risk Factors of Mega Infrastructure Projects from an Extended Sustainable Development Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-29, July.
    18. Namujju, Lillian Donna & Acquah-Swanzy, Henrietta & Ngoti, Irene F., 2023. "An IAD framework analysis of minigrid institutions for sustainable rural electrification in East Africa: A comparative study of Uganda and Tanzania," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Minxun Ma & Nannan Wang & Wenjian Mu & Lin Zhang, 2022. "The Instrumentality of Public-Private Partnerships for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Alexander Smajgl, 2007. "Modelling evolving rules for the use of common-pool resources in an agent-based model," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 5(2), pages 56-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9422-:d:1169128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.