IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9152-d1164813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Public Procurement Mechanisms Can Be Used as a Tool for Developing Pro-Poor Food Value Chains: From Entry Points to Interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael Leão

    (Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF) Research Unit, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Enioluwa Jonathan Ijatuyi

    (Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF) Research Unit, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Luis F. Goulao

    (Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF) Research Unit, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
    TERRA—Laboratory for Sustainable Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Smallholder farmers from developing countries are among the most vulnerable populations facing high food insecurity. Participation in agri-food value chains can offer a valuable pathway out of poverty for millions of poor households in these regions due to their trans-sectorial ability to create empowerment, inclusion, and economic value. Current urbanization rates and the advent of a growing middle class in developing countries make local value chains linked to regional and domestic markets increasingly valuable for smallholder farmers. Under this context, governments and institutions are key actors in influencing pro-poor value chains upgrading trajectories, and public procurement is a way by which these actors can direct participants. This study addresses an important knowledge gap in the possible practical approaches to designing and implementing such schemes. Informed by a literature review, a contextual appraisal of the major advantages and disadvantages of public procurement for the pro-poor development of value chains was conducted. A framework of analysis and intervention is then proposed and discussed. Based on the critical and contextualized analysis of the evidence, we address strategies for public food procurement, challenges, mitigation measures, supporting interventions, and considerations for planning. Overall, our analysis suggests that several existing initiatives still lack tangible results, partly due to gaps in the implementation of laws and regulations. We also highlight that, if implemented as a stand-alone intervention, it is likely that public procurement will not be effective. Additionally, we make an argument on the importance of engaging with the private sector in the process of devising an exit strategy as part that supports long-term sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael Leão & Enioluwa Jonathan Ijatuyi & Luis F. Goulao, 2023. "How Public Procurement Mechanisms Can Be Used as a Tool for Developing Pro-Poor Food Value Chains: From Entry Points to Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9152-:d:1164813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minh, Thai Thi & Osei-Amponsah, Charity, 2021. "Towards poor-centred value chain for sustainable development: a conceptual framework," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-14.().
    2. Ana Miranda, 2018. "Public food procurement from smallholder farmers: literature review and best practices," Working Papers 176, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    3. Ann Florini, 2014. "The Public Roles of the Private Sector in Asia: The Emerging Research Agenda," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 33-44, January.
    4. Ann Florini, 2014. "The Public Roles of the Private Sector in Asia: The Emerging Research Agenda," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201401, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    5. Sumberg, James & Sabates-Wheeler, Rachel, 2011. "Linking agricultural development to school feeding in sub-Saharan Africa: Theoretical perspectives," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 341-349, June.
    6. Fischer, Elisabeth & Qaim, Matin, 2012. "Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1255-1268.
    7. Lowder, Sarah K. & Skoet, Jakob & Singh, Saumya, 2014. "What do we really know about the number and distribution of farms and family farms in the world? Background paper for The State of Food and Agriculture 2014," ESA Working Papers 288983, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    8. Fan, Shenggen & Brzeska, Joanna & Keyzer, Michiel & Halsema, Alex, 2013. "From subsistence to profit: Transforming smallholder farms," Food policy reports 26, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Christopher McCrudden, 2004. "Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 28(4), pages 257-267, November.
    10. McCrudden, Christopher, 2007. "Buying Social Justice: Equality, Government Procurement, & Legal Change," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199232437.
    11. Birner, Regina & Resnick, Danielle, 2010. "The Political Economy of Policies for Smallholder Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1442-1452, October.
    12. Ann Florini & Markus Pauli, 2018. "Collaborative governance for the Sustainable Development Goals," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 583-598, September.
    13. Ann Florini and Markus Pauli, 2018. "Collaborative governance for the Sustainable Development Goals," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201842, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    14. Ana Miranda, 2018. "Public food procurement from smallholder farmers: literature review and best practices," One Pager 411, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    15. Nuhu, Ahmed Salim & Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. & Awokuse, Titus & Kabwe, Stephen, 2021. "Do benefits of expanded midstream activities in crop value chains accrue to smallholder farmers? Evidence from Zambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. Bokusheva, Raushan & Finger, Robert & Fischler, Martin & Berlin, Robert & Marin, Yuri & Perez, Francisco Jose & Paiz, Francisco, 2012. "Factors Determining the Adoption and Impact of a Postharvest Storage Technology," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 125138, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ann Florini & Markus Pauli, 2018. "Collaborative governance for the Sustainable Development Goals," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 583-598, September.
    2. Clement Mensah & Abdulrazak Karriem, 2021. "Harnessing Public Food Procurement for Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in South Africa through the National School Nutrition Programme: A Qualitative Assessment of Contributions and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Istvan Rado & Mei-Fei Lu & I-Chen Lin & Ken Aoo, 2021. "Societal Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Asian Rural Societies: A Multi-Sectoral Social Capital Approach in Thailand, Taiwan, and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethlehem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2018. "Productivity and efficiency in high-potential areas," IFPRI book chapters, in: The economics of teff: Exploring Ethiopia’s biggest cash crop, chapter 7, pages 149-180, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Radtke, Jörg & Scherhaufer, Patrick, 2022. "A social science perspective on conflicts in the energy transition: An introduction to the special issue," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Mirjam Strupler Leiser & Stefan C. Wolter, 2017. "Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Social Public Procurement Policy: The Case of the Swiss Apprenticeship Training System," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 31(2), pages 204-222, June.
    7. Meilin Ma & Jessie Lin & Richard J. Sexton, 2022. "The Transition from Small to Large Farms in Developing Economies: A Welfare Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 111-133, January.
    8. Weber, Heloise & Weber, Martin, 2020. "When means of implementation meet Ecological Modernization Theory: A critical frame for thinking about the Sustainable Development Goals initiative," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Raju Ghimire & Wen-Chi Huang, 2015. "Household wealth and adoption of improved maize varieties in Nepal: a double-hurdle approach," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(6), pages 1321-1335, December.
    10. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Laura Treviño-Lozano, 2022. "Framing Social Sustainability in Infrastructure Theory and Practice: A Review of Two Road Projects in Mexico from a Business and Human Rights Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.
    13. Elena Pagliarino & Elena Santanera & Greta Falavigna, 2021. "Opportunities for and Limits to Cooperation between School and Families in Sustainable Public Food Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Luna, Fátima & Wilson, Paul N., 2015. "An Economic Exploration of Smallholder Value Chains: Coffee Transactions in Chiapas, Mexico," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethelihem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2015. "Smallholder Teff Productivity and Efficiency: Evidence from High-Potential Districts of Ethiopia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212257, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Joshua B. Forrest, 2017. "Rural Development and Food Security in the 21st Century: A Review and Proposal," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 33(4), pages 448-468, December.
    17. Addisu A. Lashitew, 2021. "Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change?," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 184-200, March.
    18. Xinyu Yang & Weidong Liu, 2022. "Agricultural Production Networks and Upgrading from a Global–Local Perspective: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethlehem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2015. "Cereal productivity and its drivers: The case of Ethiopia:," ESSP working papers 75, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Ana Miranda, 2019. "Compras públicas de alimentos a pequeños agricultores: revisión bibliográfica y buenas prácticas," Working Papers Spanish 176, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9152-:d:1164813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.