IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3964-d780987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Potential Valid Clients for a Sustainable Insurance Policy Using an Advanced Mixed Classification Model

Author

Listed:
  • You-Shyang Chen

    (Department of Information Management, Hwa Hsia University of Technology, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan)

  • Chien-Ku Lin

    (Department of Business Management, Hsiuping University of Science and Technology, Taichung City 412, Taiwan
    Department of Multimedia Game Development and Application, Hungkuang University, Taichung City 433, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Sheng Lin

    (Executive Doctoral Business Administration, Danphine University of Business, CEDEX 16, 75775 Paris, France)

  • Su-Fen Chen

    (Department of Management and Information & Department of Business, National Open University, New Taipei City 247, Taiwan)

  • Huei-Hua Tsao

    (Graduate Institute of Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan)

Abstract

Due to the social awareness of risk control, we are witnessing the popularization of the insurance concept and the rapid development of financial insurance. The performance of the insurance industry is highly competitive; thus, in order to develop new and old business from existing clients, information on the renewal of client premiums, purchase of new policies, and new client referrals has become an important research topic in this field. However, based on a review of published literature, few scholars have engaged in relevant research on the above topics by data mining, which motivated the formation of this study, hoping to bridge this gap. We constructed 10 mixed classification prediction models (called Models A–J) using advanced data mining techniques. Moreover, 19 conditional attributes (coded as X1–X19) were selected from the collected insurance client database, plus three different decision attributes (coded as X20–X22): whether to pay the renewal insurance premium, whether to buy a new insurance policy, and whether to introduce new clients. In terms of technical methods, we used two data pretreatment techniques, attribute selection and data discretization, combined with different methods of disassembly in proportion and data cross-validation to conduct data analysis of the collected experimental data set. We also combined and calculated 23 important classification algorithms (or classifiers) in seven different classifications of data mining techniques (i.e., decision tree, Bayes, Function, Lazy, Meta, Mise, and Rule). In terms of the experimental results of insurance data, this study has the following important contributions and findings: (1) finding the best classifier; (2) finding the optimal mixed classification model; (3) determining the best disassembly in proportion; (4) comparing the performance of different disassembly in proportion and data cross-validation methods; (5) determining the important factors influencing the decision attribute “whether to purchase a new insurance policy”, including the time interval to the first purchase, the number of valid policies, the total number of purchased policies, the family salary structure, and gender; and (6) building a knowledge base of decision rules and criteria with the decision tree C4.5 technology, which shall be provided to relevant stakeholders such as insurance dealers and insurance salespeople as a reference for looking for valid clients in the future, and is conducive to the rapid expansion of insurance business. Finally, the important research findings and management implications of this study can serve as a basis for further study of sustainable insurance by academic researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • You-Shyang Chen & Chien-Ku Lin & Yu-Sheng Lin & Su-Fen Chen & Huei-Hua Tsao, 2022. "Identification of Potential Valid Clients for a Sustainable Insurance Policy Using an Advanced Mixed Classification Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3964-:d:780987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3964/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3964/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Praphula Kumar Jain & Waris Quamer & Rajendra Pamula, 2021. "Sports result prediction using data mining techniques in comparison with base line model," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(1), pages 54-70, March.
    2. Ganesh Dash & Debarun Chakraborty, 2021. "Digital Transformation of Marketing Strategies during a Pandemic: Evidence from an Emerging Economy during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Timothy F. Harris & Aaron Yelowitz & Charles Courtemanche, 2021. "Did COVID‐19 change life insurance offerings?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(4), pages 831-861, December.
    4. Camille Landais & Johannes Spinnewijn, 2021. "The Value of Unemployment Insurance [Choice Inconsistencies Among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(6), pages 3041-3085.
    5. Hanming Fang & Edward Kung, 2021. "Why do life insurance policyholders lapse? The roles of income, health, and bequest motive shocks," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(4), pages 937-970, December.
    6. So, Banghee & Boucher, Jean-Philippe & Valdez, Emiliano A., 2021. "Cost-Sensitive Multi-Class Adaboost For Understanding Driving Behavior Based On Telematics," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 719-751, September.
    7. Kanitsorn Terdpaopong & Robert C. Rickards, 2021. "Thai Non-Life Insurance Companies’ Resilience and the Historic 2011 Floods: Some Recommendations for Greater Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Christophe Courbage & Christina Nicolas, 2021. "Trust in insurance: The importance of experiences," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(2), pages 263-291, June.
    9. Montserrat Guillen & Jens Perch Nielsen & Ana M. Pérez-Marín & Valandis Elpidorou, 2020. "Can Automobile Insurance Telematics Predict the Risk of Near-Miss Events?," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 141-152, January.
    10. Alicja Wolny-Dominiak & Tomasz Żądło, 2021. "The Measures of Accuracy of Claim Frequency Credibility Predictor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    11. Fernando P. Santos & Jorge M. Pacheco & Francisco C. Santos & Simon A. Levin, 2021. "Dynamics of informal risk sharing in collective index insurance," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 426-432, May.
    12. Ruixue Wang & Roderick M Rejesus & Serkan Aglasan, 2021. "Warming Temperatures, Yield Risk and Crop Insurance Participation [Federal crop insurance and the disincentive to adapt to extreme heat]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(5), pages 1109-1131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min-feng Lee & Guey-shya Chen & Shao-pin Lin & Wei-jie Wang, 2022. "A Data Mining Study on House Price in Central Regions of Taiwan Using Education Categorical Data, Environmental Indicators, and House Features Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Cooley & Steven M. Smith, 2022. "Center Pivot Irrigation Systems as a Form of Drought Risk Mitigation in Humid Regions," NBER Chapters, in: American Agriculture, Water Resources, and Climate Change, pages 135-171, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Renuka Sane & Susan Thomas, 2020. "From Participation To Repurchase: Low Income Households And Micro‐insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 87(3), pages 783-814, September.
    3. Michael Hoy & Afrasiab Mirza & Asha Sadanand, 2021. "Guaranteed renewable life insurance under demand uncertainty," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(1), pages 131-159, March.
    4. Michael Ziegelmeyer & Julius Nick, 2013. "Backing out of private pension provision: lessons from Germany," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 40(3), pages 505-539, August.
    5. Praveen Ranjan Srivastava & Prajwal Eachempati & Ajay Kumar & Ashish Kumar Jha & Lalitha Dhamotharan, 2023. "Best strategy to win a match: an analytical approach using hybrid machine learning-clustering-association rule framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 319-361, June.
    6. Zhang, Yitong & Hao, Zengchao & Zhang, Yu, 2023. "Agricultural risk assessment of compound dry and hot events in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Ganesh Dash & Chetan Sharma & Shamneesh Sharma, 2023. "Sustainable Marketing and the Role of Social Media: An Experimental Study Using Natural Language Processing (NLP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Ralph S.J. Koijen & Stijn Nieuwerburgh & Motohiro Yogo, 2016. "Health and Mortality Delta: Assessing the Welfare Cost of Household Insurance Choice," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 71(2), pages 957-1010, April.
    9. Radoslaw Paluszynski & Pei Cheng Yu, 2023. "Commitment versus Flexibility and Sticky Prices: Evidence from Life Insurance," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 49, pages 99-122, July.
    10. Christoph Hambel & Holger Kraft & Lorenz S. Schendel & Mogens Steffensen, 2017. "Life Insurance Demand Under Health Shock Risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(4), pages 1171-1202, December.
    11. Kolsrud, Jonas & Landais, Camille & Spinnewijn, Johannes, 2020. "The value of registry data for consumption analysis: An application to health shocks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Montserrat Guillen & Jens Perch Nielsen & Ana M. Pérez‐Marín, 2021. "Near‐miss telematics in motor insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(3), pages 569-589, September.
    13. Andrew R. Tilman & Elisabeth H. Krueger & Lisa C. McManus & James R. Watson, 2023. "Maintaining human wellbeing as socio-environmental systems undergo regime shifts," Papers 2309.04578, arXiv.org.
    14. Gemmo, Irina & Götz, Martin, 2016. "Life insurance and demographic change: An empirical analysis of surrender decisions based on panel data," ICIR Working Paper Series 24/16, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    15. Maria Carannante & Valeria D’Amato & Paola Fersini & Salvatore Forte & Giuseppe Melisi, 2022. "Disruption of Life Insurance Profitability in the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Juan Pablo Atal & Hanming Fang & Martin Karlsson & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2019. "Exit, Voice, or Loyalty? An Investigation Into Mandated Portability of Front‐Loaded Private Health Plans," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 86(3), pages 697-727, September.
    17. Lichter, Andreas & Schiprowski, Amelie, 2021. "Benefit duration, job search behavior and re-employment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Cheng, Chunli, 2022. "Beyond death: The impact of a population-wide health shock on life insurance," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Zhiyu Quan & Changyue Hu & Panyi Dong & Emiliano A. Valdez, 2024. "Improving Business Insurance Loss Models by Leveraging InsurTech Innovation," Papers 2401.16723, arXiv.org.
    20. Rich Ryan, 2023. "Discretionary Extensions to Unemployment Insurance Compensation and Some Potential Costs for a McCall Worker," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-39, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3964-:d:780987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.