IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16256-d994618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Business Model of Digital Platforms for the Sharing Economy: Intensive Case Study Methodology for Rover.com Pet Boarding Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Bo-Chiuan Su

    (School of Business, Putian University, Putian 351100, China)

  • Hongxi Lin

    (School of Business, Putian University, Putian 351100, China)

  • Yu-Mei Wang

    (Department of Information Management, National Central University, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan)

Abstract

The sharing economy has allowed idle resources to be used again and is known as a model for the new economy. Advances in network technology have allowed the scale of the sharing economy to be expanded through digital platforms. To our best knowledge, no studies in the literature have explored a pet boarding platform for the sharing economy. This research selected the emerging pet care industry as its scope and took the Rover.com pet boarding digital platform, with the highest market share in the world, as the research object for an intensive case study. Three types of secondary data analysis were used: industry profile analysis, case information, and papers and journals. The business model and value proposition of the platform summarizes the key to the success of digital platforms, which is expected to be helpful to entrepreneurs who want to create a sharing economy marketplace. The research results showed that the sharing economy needs to use digital platforms as a matching intermediary between supply and demand to establish a personal-to-personal transaction pattern and it also needs digital platforms to establish a sense of trust and a guarantee mechanism for participants in the sharing economy. For the digital platform to be profitable, it must identify the platform’s unique value proposition and business model, and set up monitoring of transaction parties and evaluation functions, as well as insurance systems and digital platform IT support.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo-Chiuan Su & Hongxi Lin & Yu-Mei Wang, 2022. "The Business Model of Digital Platforms for the Sharing Economy: Intensive Case Study Methodology for Rover.com Pet Boarding Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16256-:d:994618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris, Michael & Schindehutte, Minet & Allen, Jeffrey, 2005. "The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 726-735, June.
    2. Rebecca Scott & Julien Cayla & Bernard Cova, 2017. "Selling Pain to the Saturated Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 22-43.
    3. Benoit, Sabine & Wang, Yonggui & Teng, Lefa & Hampson, Daniel P. & Li, Xia, 2022. "Innovation in the sharing economy: A framework and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 207-216.
    4. Joachim Stonig & Torsten Schmid & Günter Müller‐Stewens, 2022. "From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1927-1957, September.
    5. Brockman, Beverly K. & Taylor, Valerie A. & Brockman, Christopher M., 2008. "The price of unconditional love: Consumer decision making for high-dollar veterinary care," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 397-405, May.
    6. Kim, Jungkeun, 2019. "The impact of different price promotions on customer retention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 95-102.
    7. Piepponen, Amanda & Ritala, Paavo & Keränen, Joona & Maijanen, Päivi, 2022. "Digital transformation of the value proposition: A single case study in the media industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 311-325.
    8. Rojanakit, Patcharapar & Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Dulleck, Uwe, 2022. "The sharing economy: A critical review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1317-1334.
    9. Jason García Portilla, 2022. "Case Selection Criteria, Methods, and Data Treatment," Contributions to Economics, in: “Ye Shall Know Them by Their Fruits”, chapter 0, pages 259-267, Springer.
    10. Elena Lyaskovskaya & Tatyana Khudyakova, 2021. "Sharing Economy: For or against Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Xusen Cheng & Jian Mou & Xiangbin Yan, 2021. "Sharing economy enabled digital platforms for development," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 635-644, October.
    12. Hui Li & Yijin Kim & Kannan Srinivasan, 2022. "Market Shifts in the Sharing Economy: The Impact of Airbnb on Housing Rentals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8015-8044, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pavel Pelech & Jaroslava Dědková, 2024. "The Stranger Factor: How Familiarity Influences Sharing Behaviour across Generations," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(3), pages 49-73.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laudien, Sven M. & Manuel Guaita Martínez, José & María Martín Martín, José, 2023. "Business models based on sharing fashion and accessories: Qualitative-empirical insights into a new type of sharing economy business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Carson Duan, 2023. "Towards a comprehensive analytical framework and future research agenda for research on sharing economy business models: thematic analyses approach," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 977-1016, December.
    3. Neill, Clinton & Zhang, Peilu, . "Payment Plans and Veterinary Services: Do They Reduce the Pain of Pet Owner Payment?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 49(01).
    4. Carson Duan, 2023. "A State-of-the-Art Review of Sharing Economy Business Models and a Forecast of Future Research Directions for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-37, March.
    5. Ahmad, Najid & Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Tian, Xian-Liang, 2024. "Assessing the impact of the sharing economy and technological innovation on sustainable development: An empirical investigation of the United Kingdom," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Huynh Thi Thuy Giang & Luu Tien Dung & Huynh Thuy Tien & Chung Tu Bao Nhu, 2024. "Customer empowerment and engagement on sharing platform in the retailing sector: testing the mediating effects of service innovation and platform trust," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    8. Massa, Silvia & Testa, Stefania, 2011. "Beyond the conventional-specialty dichotomy in food retailing business models: An Italian case study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 476-482.
    9. Zhongmiao Sun & Jinrong Liu, 2023. "Impacts of differentiated services and competition on the pricing strategies of ride‐hailing platforms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3604-3624, September.
    10. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    11. Jia, Yibo & Su, Jingqin & Cui, Li & Wu, Lin & Hua Tan, Kim, 2023. "Platform business model innovation in the digitalization era: A “driver-process-result” perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Ashkan Faramarzi & Stefan Worm & Wolfgang Ulaga, 2024. "Service strategy’s effect on firm performance: A meta-analysis of the servitization literature," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1018-1044, July.
    13. Coskun-Setirek, Abide & Tanrikulu, Zuhal, 2021. "Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Puie Florina Răzvanţă, 2019. "Conceptual framework for rural business models," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1130-1139, May.
    15. Oseni, Musiliu O. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2017. "The prospects for smart energy prices: Observations from 50 years of residential pricing for fixed line telecoms and electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 150-160.
    16. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau & Bernard de Montmorillon, 2017. "Understanding emergence in business model development: how companies interact with stakeholders to deal with environmental ambiguity," Post-Print hal-01787276, HAL.
    17. Duncan, Denvil & Ross, Justin, 2025. "The effect of Airbnb on housing prices: Evidence from the 2017 solar eclipse," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-027, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Giger, Markus & Mutea, Emily & Kiteme, Boniface & Eckert, Sandra & Anseeuw, Ward & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2020. "Large agricultural investments in Kenya’s Nanyuki Area: Inventory and analysis of business models," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    20. Holmqvist, Jonas & Ponsignon, Frédéric, 2025. "Liminality in customer experiences: The uncertain outcome of employing liminal spaces for customer escapism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16256-:d:994618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.