IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14032-d955803.html

How Does Manufacturing Intelligentization Influence Innovation in China from a Nonlinear Perspective and Economic Servitization Background?

Author

Listed:
  • Genghua Tang

    (School of Economics and Commerce, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Hongxun Mai

    (School of Economics and Commerce, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

Abstract

Under the trend of high-quality economic development and economic servitization in China, it is of great significance to study the impact of manufacturing intelligentization on innovation and its mechanisms. This study uses a sample of 30 of China’s provinces from 2008 to 2020 to empirically test the effect of manufacturing intelligentization on innovation performance from a nonlinear perspective and examine the intermediary mechanism of diversified agglomeration of producer services against an economic servitization background. The study finds that intelligentization has a significant inverted U-shaped impact on innovation performance. It shows that the positive marginal intelligentization effect on innovation gradually decreases, and intelligence inhibits innovation when it exceeds the threshold. In addition, diversified agglomeration of producer services can improve innovation performance, and intelligentization has an inverted U-shaped effect on this diversified aggregation. Thus, the nonlinear influence of intelligence on innovation performance has a channel of diversified agglomeration of producer services. Furthermore, human capital has a reverse moderating effect on the inverted U-shaped relationship between intelligentization and innovation performance. This conclusion can help to promote the innovation-driven and sustainable development of China’s economy under the intelligent manufacturing strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Genghua Tang & Hongxun Mai, 2022. "How Does Manufacturing Intelligentization Influence Innovation in China from a Nonlinear Perspective and Economic Servitization Background?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14032-:d:955803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14032/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14032/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Jun & Chang, Huihong & Forrest, Jeffrey Yi-Lin & Yang, Baohua, 2020. "Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of china's manufacturing sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. T. Ravichandran & Shu Han & Sunil Mithas, 2017. "Mitigating Diminishing Returns to R&D: The Role of Information Technology in Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 812-827, December.
    3. Landon Kleis & Paul Chwelos & Ronald V. Ramirez & Iain Cockburn, 2012. "Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 42-59, March.
    4. Wen-Hsiang Yu & Chuang-Chun Chiou, 2022. "Effects of Sustainable Development of the Logistics Industry by Cloud Operational System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Jaime Gómez & Idana Salazar & Pilar Vargas, 2017. "Does Information Technology Improve Open Innovation Performance? An Examination of Manufacturers in Spain," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 661-675, September.
    6. Andrew V. Shipilov, 2009. "Firm Scope Experience, Historic Multimarket Contact with Partners, Centrality, and the Relationship Between Structural Holes and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 85-106, February.
    7. Xiaoli Li & Kun Li & Hao Zhou, 2022. "Impact of Inventor’s Cooperation Network on Ambidextrous Innovation in Chinese AI Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Yang, Haochang & Li, Lianshui & Liu, Yaobin, 2022. "The effect of manufacturing intelligence on green innovation performance in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Gilles Duranton & Diego Puga, 2001. "Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1454-1477, December.
    10. Rammer, Christian & Fernández, Gastón P. & Czarnitzki, Dirk, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and industrial innovation: Evidence from German firm-level data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    11. Gautam Ahuja & Curba Morris Lampert, 2001. "Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 521-543, June.
    12. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    13. Ghasemaghaei, Maryam & Calic, Goran, 2019. "Does big data enhance firm innovation competency? The mediating role of data-driven insights," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 69-84.
    14. Jinqi Su & Ke Su & Shubin Wang, 2021. "Does the Digital Economy Promote Industrial Structural Upgrading?—A Test of Mediating Effects Based on Heterogeneous Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Rabetino, Rodrigo & Kohtamäki, Marko & Gebauer, Heiko, 2017. "Strategy map of servitization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 144-156.
    16. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello, 2002. "Milieux Innovateurs and Collective Learning: From Concepts to Measurement," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Zoltan J. Acs & Henri L. F. Groot & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), The Emergence of the Knowledge Economy, chapter 2, pages 15-45, Springer.
    17. Inácio Fernandes de Araújo & Eduardo Gonçalves & Juliana Gonçalves Taveira, 2019. "The Role of Patent Co-inventorship Networks in Regional Inventive Performance," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 42(3-4), pages 235-280, May.
    18. Kohtamäki, Marko & Einola, Suvi & Rabetino, Rodrigo, 2020. "Exploring servitization through the paradox lens: Coping practices in servitization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Thomas Niebel & Fabienne Rasel & Steffen Viete, 2019. "BIG data – BIG gains? Understanding the link between big data analytics and innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 296-316, April.
    20. Gebauer, Heiko & Saul, Caroline Jennings & Haldimann, Mirella & Gustafsson, Anders, 2017. "Organizational capabilities for pay-per-use services in product-oriented companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 157-168.
    21. Shan Wu & Jinlong Zhang, 2021. "Research on a Compound Dual Innovation Capability Model of Intelligent Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Guo & Liu, Yishuang & Gao, Qizheng & Zhang, Jianqing, 2023. "Does regional services development enhance manufacturing firm productivity? A manufacturing servitization perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 451-466.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Feng, 2023. "Do Intelligent Manufacturing Concerns Promote Corporate Sustainability? Based on the Perspective of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Chongchong, 2024. "Enhancing energy-environmental performance through industrial intelligence: Insights from Chinese prefectural-level cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    3. Chong Wang & Lei Wang, 2024. "State‐led urbanization and technological innovation: A quasi‐natural experiment from county‐to‐district conversion in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), June.
    4. Xingguang Guo & Xi Chen, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Manufacturing-Enterprise Innovation: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Lipeng Sun & Nur Ashikin Mohd Saat, 2023. "How Does Intelligent Manufacturing Affect the ESG Performance of Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Yao, Yun & Zhang, Kaining, 2026. "GenAI investment in the industrial chain and firm breakthrough innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Chaobo Zhou, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Urban Air Quality: The Role of Government and Public Environmental Attention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Oduro, Stephen & De Nisco, Alessandro & Mainolfi, Giada, 2023. "Do digital technologies pay off? A meta-analytic review of the digital technologies/firm performance nexus," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Ding, Tao & Li, Jiangyuan & Shi, Xing & Li, Xuhui & Chen, Ya, 2023. "Is artificial intelligence associated with carbon emissions reduction? Case of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    10. Lombardi, Silvia & Santini, Erica & Vecciolini, Claudia, 2022. "Drivers of territorial servitization: An empirical analysis of manufacturing productivity in local value chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    11. Wang, Chong & Wang, Lei, 2024. "Does broadband infrastructure promote urban innovation? Evidence from “Broadband China” demonstration policy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 349-362.
    12. Zhang, Wei & Ye, Shiqi & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Emrouznejad, Ali & Song, Malin, 2024. "Smart platforming in automotive manufacturing for NetZero: Intelligentization, green technology, and innovation dynamics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    13. Christian Rammer & Gastón P Fernández & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Innovation: Evidence from Firm-Level Data," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 674605, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
    14. Antonioli, Davide & Marzucchi, Alberto & Rentocchini, Francesco & Vannuccini, Simone, 2024. "Robot adoption and product innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    15. Xiaoli Li & Kun Li & Hao Zhou, 2022. "Impact of Inventor’s Cooperation Network on Ambidextrous Innovation in Chinese AI Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.
    17. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    18. Forman, Chris & van Zeebroeck, Nicolas, 2019. "Digital technology adoption and knowledge flows within firms: Can the Internet overcome geographic and technological distance?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    19. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Chongchong, 2024. "The effects of industrial robots on firm energy intensity: From the perspective of technological innovation and electrification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2008. "Mountains in a flat world: why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 371-388.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14032-:d:955803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.