IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13789-d951882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Carbon Emission Quota of Railway in China from the Perspective of Equity and Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Yanan Guo

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Qiong Tong

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Zhengjiao Li

    (School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Yuhao Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

Under the constraint of total carbon emissions, the allocation of carbon emission quotas of 18 railway bureaus in China is conducted to the realization of carbon emission reduction targets of China’s railway transportation industry. This paper proposes a carbon emission quota model for China’s railway industry from the perspective of equity and efficiency and innovatively undertakes research on the allocation of carbon emission quotas for railway administrations. This paper constructs an econometric model to analyze the impact of various influencing factors on China’s railway operation carbon emission and predicts the total carbon emission of China’s railway operation from 2021 to 2030 by scenario analysis method. From the perspective of equity and efficiency, apply the entropy method to give weight to historical responsibility, egalitarianism, and efficiency principle to obtain the initial allocation value of the carbon emission quota of the operator’s 18 regional railway bureau groups; the ZSG-DEA model is used to obtain the optimal allocation. The results show that railway passenger turnover, freight turnover, vehicle structure, and per capita GDP have a promoting effect on railway carbon emission, and the proportion of clean energy has an inhibitory effect on carbon emission. There is a gap between the distribution results under the single principle and the comprehensive distribution results; the combination of both can more effectively promote the development of the railway industry. From the perspective of equity and efficiency, the carbon emission quota of 18 railway bureau groups in China is high in the east and low in the west. Among them, the Shanghai railway bureau obtains the most carbon emission quota, while the Qinghai–Tibet railway bureau obtains the least carbon emission quota. The research results provide a reference for the railway bureau to coordinate emission reduction and the construction of the railway transport carbon emission market.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanan Guo & Qiong Tong & Zhengjiao Li & Yuhao Zhao, 2022. "Research on Carbon Emission Quota of Railway in China from the Perspective of Equity and Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13789-:d:951882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13789/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13789/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lins, Marcos P. Estellita & Gomes, Eliane G. & Soares de Mello, Joao Carlos C. B. & Soares de Mello, Adelino Jose R., 2003. "Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 312-322, July.
    2. Avogadro, Nicolò & Cattaneo, Mattia & Paleari, Stefano & Redondi, Renato, 2021. "Replacing short-medium haul intra-European flights with high-speed rail: Impact on CO2 emissions and regional accessibility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 25-39.
    3. Da Gao & Yi Li & Qiuyue Yang, 2021. "Can pollution charges reform promote industrial SO2 emissions reduction?—Evidence from 189 China’s cities," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(1), pages 96-112, February.
    4. Yu, Anyu & You, Jianxin & Rudkin, Simon & Zhang, Hao, 2019. "Industrial carbon abatement allocations and regional collaboration: Re-evaluating China through a modified data envelopment analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 232-243.
    5. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2020. "A comprehensive method for the robustness assessment of high-speed rail network with operation data: A case in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 666-681.
    6. Gao, Da & Li, Ge & Yu, Jiyu, 2022. "Does digitization improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from Chinese 213 cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Li, Hongchang & Yu, Kemei & Wang, Kun & Zhang, Anming, 2019. "Market power and its determinants in the Chinese railway industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 261-276.
    8. Fang, Kai & Zhang, Qifeng & Long, Yin & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Sun, Lu & Zhang, Haoran & Dou, Yi & Li, Shuai, 2019. "How can China achieve its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions by 2030? A multi-criteria allocation of China’s carbon emission allowance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 380-389.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qinliang Tan & Jin Zheng & Yihong Ding & Yimei Zhang, 2020. "Provincial Carbon Emission Quota Allocation Study in China from the Perspective of Abatement Cost and Regional Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Dalai Ma & Yaping Xiao & Na Zhao, 2022. "Optimization and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Carbon Emission Rights Allocation in the Power Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Yu, Anyu & Lee, Andy & Chen, Yao, 2021. "Carbon allocation targeting with abatement capability: A firm-level study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Sun, J. & Wen, W. & Wang, M. & Zhou, P., 2022. "Optimizing the provincial target allocation scheme of renewable portfolio standards in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    5. Zhang, Yanfang & Wei, Jinpeng & Gao, Qi & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhou, Dequn, 2022. "Coordination between the energy-consumption permit trading scheme and carbon emissions trading: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Li, Mengxu & Liu, Jianghua & Chen, Yang & Yang, Zhijiu, 2023. "Can sustainable development strategy reduce income inequality in resource-based regions? A natural resource dependence perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Wu, Yinyin & Wang, Ping & Liu, Xin & Chen, Jiandong & Song, Malin, 2020. "Analysis of regional carbon allocation and carbon trading based on net primary productivity in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    8. Wang, Yunqi & Qiu, Jing & Tao, Yuechuan & Zhang, Xian & Wang, Guibin, 2020. "Low-carbon oriented optimal energy dispatch in coupled natural gas and electricity systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    9. Han, Rong & Li, Jianglong & Guo, Zhi, 2022. "Optimal quota in China's energy capping policy in 2030 with renewable targets and sectoral heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    10. Shi, Wei & Li, Wei & Qiao, Fuwei & Wang, Weijuan & An, Yi & Zhang, Guowei, 2023. "An inter-provincial carbon quota study in China based on the contribution of clean energy to carbon reduction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Guoyu Wang & Jinsheng Zhou, 2022. "Multiobjective Optimization of Carbon Emission Reduction Responsibility Allocation in the Open-Pit Mine Production Process against the Background of Peak Carbon Dioxide Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Zhou, Zhengyi & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "High-speed rail and industrial developments: Evidence from house prices and city-level GDP in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 98-113.
    13. Yang, Mian & Hou, Yaru & Ji, Qiang & Zhang, Dayong, 2020. "Assessment and optimization of provincial CO2 emission reduction scheme in China: An improved ZSG-DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Xin Zheng & Shenya Mao & Siqi Lv & Sheng Wang, 2022. "An Optimization Study of Provincial Carbon Emission Allowance Allocation in China Based on an Improved Dynamic Zero-Sum-Gains Slacks-Based-Measure Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Wu, Feng & Huang, Ningyu & Zhang, Fan & Niu, Lulu & Zhang, Yali, 2020. "Analysis of the carbon emission reduction potential of China's key industries under the IPCC 2 °C and 1.5 °C limits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    16. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Sun, Lu & Liu, Wenjing & Li, Zhaoling & Cai, Bofeng & Fujii, Minoru & Luo, Xiao & Chen, Wei & Geng, Yong & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Le, Yiping, 2021. "Spatial and structural characteristics of CO2 emissions in East Asian megacities and its indication for low-carbon city development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    18. Zhenxiang Cao & Liqing Peng, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Economics on Environmental Quality: A System Dynamics Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    19. Alireza Amirteimoori & Sohrab Kordrostami, 2012. "A distance-based measure of super efficiency in data envelopment analysis: an application to gas companies," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 117-128, September.
    20. Senhua Huang & Lingming Chen, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Urban Total-Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from 275 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13789-:d:951882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.