IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12589-d932782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Chinese Consumers’ Consistent Use of Mobile Food Ordering Apps

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolong Wang

    (College of Business Administration, Wonkwang University, No. 460, Iksandae-ro, Iksan 54538, Korea)

  • Wenkun Zhang

    (Department of Business and Administration, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250307, China)

  • Tao Zhang

    (Department of Management, Shandong Vocational University of Foreign Affairs, Weihai 264504, China)

  • Yanan Wang

    (Department of Business and Administration, Mokpo University, Yeongsan-ro, Cheonggye-myeon, Muan-gun 58554, Korea)

  • Sanggyun Na

    (College of Business Administration, Wonkwang University, No. 460, Iksandae-ro, Iksan 54538, Korea)

Abstract

Mobile Food Ordering Apps (MFOAs) programs have changed the way consumers order and consume food. Mobile Food Ordering Apps (MFOAs) are widely recognized in the restaurant industry as an innovative method of serving customers; however, there are important questions about the impact of implementing MFOAs on customers’ willingness to reuse such applications, and several studies have examined the results of using MFOAs from a customer perspective. The main objective of this study was to identify and empirically test the main factors that predict Chinese users’ attitudes toward MFOAs, the satisfaction and re-use of such applications, and the moderating role of habits. This study proposes an integrated model based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT), combined with the features of MFOA-added variables such as online reviews, price value and trust. A total of 212 valid questionnaires were obtained and collected from a sample of Chinese customers using MFOAs. This study uses SPSS 26.0 and smartPLS version 3.0 for a path analysis and empirical testing of the research model. There are 13 hypotheses, 6 of which are valid. H2(PE → SAT), H3(OR → SAT), H5(EOU → ATT), H6(PV → ATT), H7(TR → ATT), and H9(SAT → CI) are valid. However, H1(CON →SAT), H4(USF → ATT), H8(TR → CI), H10(ATT → CI) are not valid, and HAB does not play a moderating role between CI and SAT, CI and ATT, and CI and TR. Based on the research results, theoretical contributions and practical implications can be provided for scholars and practitioners in MFOA-related fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolong Wang & Wenkun Zhang & Tao Zhang & Yanan Wang & Sanggyun Na, 2022. "A Study of Chinese Consumers’ Consistent Use of Mobile Food Ordering Apps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12589-:d:932782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12589/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12589/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Das, Manoj & Ramalingam, Mahesh, 2022. "What drives product involvement and satisfaction with OFDs amid COVID-19?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Alsajjan, Bander & Dennis, Charles, 2010. "Internet banking acceptance model: Cross-market examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 957-963, September.
    3. Shiu, Edward & Walsh, Gianfranco & Hassan, Louise M. & Parry, Sara, 2015. "The direct and moderating influences of individual-level cultural values within web engagement: A multi-country analysis of a public information website," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 534-541.
    4. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    5. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Thomas R. Shaw & D. Sandy Staples, 2004. "Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 250-267, September.
    6. Kaur, Puneet & Talwar, Shalini & Islam, Nazrul & Salo, Jari & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "The effect of the valence of forgiveness to service recovery strategies and service outcomes in food delivery apps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 142-157.
    7. Kumar, Sushant & Jain, Aarushi & Hsieh, Jung-Kuei, 2021. "Impact of apps aesthetics on revisit intentions of food delivery apps: The mediating role of pleasure and arousal," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Kapoor, Anuj Pal & Vij, Madhu, 2018. "Technology at the dinner table: Ordering food online through mobile apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 342-351.
    9. Yeo, Vincent Cheow Sern & Goh, See-Kwong & Rezaei, Sajad, 2017. "Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 150-162.
    10. Algharabat, Raed & Abdallah Alalwan, Ali & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2017. "Three dimensional product presentation quality antecedents and their consequences for online retailers: The moderating role of virtual product experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 203-217.
    11. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    12. Suk Won Lee & Hye Jin Sung & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2019. "Determinants of Continuous Intention on Food Delivery Apps: Extending UTAUT2 with Information Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Wenkun Zhang & Yanan Wang & Tao Zhang, 2021. "Can “Live Streaming†Really Drive Visitors to the Destination? From the Aspect of “Social Presenceâ€," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    14. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    15. Pinho, José Carlos & Soares, Ana Maria, 2011. "Examining the Technology Acceptance Model in the Adoption of Social Ne tworks," Apas Papers 348, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    16. Mahmud Akhter Shareef & Vinod Kumar & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Uma Kumar, 2016. "Service delivery through mobile-government (mGov): Driving factors and cultural impacts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 315-332, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanan Zhang & Xinmin Liu & Liu Fan, 2022. "Understanding Incubated Startups’ Continuance Intention towards Entrepreneurial Incubation Platforms: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loureiro, Sandra M.C. & Cavallero, Luisa & Miranda, Francisco Javier, 2018. "Fashion brands on retail websites: Customer performance expectancy and e-word-of-mouth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 131-141.
    2. Burlea-Schiopoiu, Adriana & Puiu, Silvia & Dinu, Adina, 2022. "The impact of food delivery applications on Romanian consumers’ behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    3. Shahzad, Khuram & Zhang, Qingyu & Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Rehman, Shafique Ur, 2023. "The role of blockchain-enabled traceability, task technology fit, and user self-efficacy in mobile food delivery applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Ding, Ye & Nayga Jr, Rodolfo M. & Zeng, Yinchu & Yang, Wei & Arielle Snell, Heather, 2022. "Consumers’ valuation of a live video feed in restaurant kitchens for online food delivery service," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Fan Cheong & Rob Law, 2022. "Will Macau’s Restaurants Survive or Thrive after Entering the O2O Food Delivery Platform in the COVID-19 Pandemic?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Hsu, Chia-Lin & Chen, Mu-Chen, 2021. "Advocating recycling and encouraging environmentally friendly habits through gamification: An empirical investigation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Shankar, Amit & Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Islam, Nazrul & Sharma, Piyush, 2022. "Balancing food waste and sustainability goals in online food delivery: Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Anbumathi, Rajendiran & Dorai, Sriram & Palaniappan, Umayal, 2023. "Evaluating the role of technology and non-technology factors influencing brand love in Online Food Delivery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Chen, Chih-Jou & Hsiao, Wei-Hung & Lin, Chin-Tsai, 2023. "Factors influencing the consumers’ behavioural intention to use online food delivery service: Empirical evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Kumar, Sushant & Shah, Arunima, 2021. "Revisiting food delivery apps during COVID-19 pandemic? Investigating the role of emotions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Mi Jin Noh & Kyung Tag Lee, 2016. "An analysis of the relationship between quality and user acceptance in smartphone apps," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 273-291, May.
    13. Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Cheng Ling & Teo, Shen Long & Tan, Kim Hua, 2021. "The role of food apps servitization on repurchase intention: A study of FoodPanda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    14. Shah, Adnan Muhammad & Abbasi, Amir Zaib & Yan, Xiangbin, 2023. "Do online peer reviews stimulate diners’ continued log-in behavior: Investigating the role of emotions in the O2O meal delivery apps context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Verma, Anuj & Chakraborty, Debarun & Verma, Meenakshi, 2023. "Barriers of food delivery applications: A perspective from innovation resistance theory using mixed method," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Rupam Chowdhury, 2023. "Impact of perceived convenience, service quality and security on consumers’ behavioural intention towards online food delivery services: the role of attitude as mediator," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Dogra, Nikhil & Adil, Mohd & Sadiq, Mohd & Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Unraveling customer repurchase intention in OFDL context: An investigation using a hybrid technique of SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    20. Rezvani, Azadeh & Dong, Linying & Khosravi, Pouria, 2017. "Promoting the continuing usage of strategic information systems: The role of supervisory leadership in the successful implementation of enterprise systems," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 417-430.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12589-:d:932782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.