IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8648-d862999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abusive Supervision Impact on Employees’ Creativity: A Mediated-Moderated Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Iftikhar Hussain

    (Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Kotli Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Kotli 11100, Pakistan)

  • Shahab Ali

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Kotli Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Kotli 11100, Pakistan)

  • Farrukh Shahzad

    (School of Economics and Management, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maonan, Maoming 525000, China)

  • Muhammad Irfan

    (School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    Center for Energy and Environment Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    Department of Business Administration, ILMA University, Karachi 75190, Pakistan)

  • Yong Wan

    (School of Economics and Management, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maonan, Maoming 525000, China)

  • Zeeshan Fareed

    (School of Economics and Management, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China)

  • Li Sun

    (School of Economics and Management, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maonan, Maoming 525000, China)

Abstract

The drive for the current study was to describe the findings carried out to understand abusive supervision and employees’ creativity in business organizations. This research investigated the effect of abusive supervision on employees’ creativity. The influence of employment insecurity as a mediating variable and the moderating role of locus of control has also been examined. The study was based on Hobfoll’s conservation of resources theory. The data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire from 500 employees working in different business organizations in Pakistan. To analyze the data, the study employed path analytic approaches using multilevel modeling in Mplus 7.1. The empirical analysis has confirmed that abusive supervision and employment insecurity have a significant negative impact on employees’ creativity. Employment infectivity partially mediates the effect of abusive supervision on employees’ creativity. Moderation analysis was performed and established that the locus of control moderates the effect of abusive supervision on employment insecurity as well as the effect of employment insecurity on employees’ creativity. The current research has contributed towards developing a better understanding of the studied variables, i.e., abusive supervision, employment insecurity, locus of control, and employees’ creativity. To the best of authors’ knowledge these variables have been studied together here for the first time. The study also forwarded practical recommendations for managers and entrepreneurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Iftikhar Hussain & Shahab Ali & Farrukh Shahzad & Muhammad Irfan & Yong Wan & Zeeshan Fareed & Li Sun, 2022. "Abusive Supervision Impact on Employees’ Creativity: A Mediated-Moderated Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8648-:d:862999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Aryee & Li-Yun Sun & Zhen Xiong George Chen & Yaw A. Debrah, 2008. "Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 4(3), pages 393-411, November.
    2. Guohong Helen Han & P. D. Harms & Yuntao Bai, 2017. "Nightmare Bosses: The Impact of Abusive Supervision on Employees’ Sleep, Emotions, and Creativity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 21-31, September.
    3. Jean-Pierre Neveu & Stevan E. Hobfoll & Jonathon Halbesleben & M Westman, 2018. "Conservation of resources in the organizational context : the reality of resources and their consequences," Post-Print hal-02472360, HAL.
    4. McLarty, Benjamin D. & Muldoon, Jeffrey & Quade, Matthew & King, Robert A., 2021. "Your boss is the problem and solution: How supervisor-induced hindrance stressors and LMX influence employee job neglect and subsequent performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 308-317.
    5. Kan Ouyang & Wing Lam & Weidong Wang, 2015. "Roles of gender and identification on abusive supervision and proactive behavior," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 671-691, September.
    6. Huy Gip & Do The Khoa & Priyanko Guchait & R.L. Fernando Garcia & Aysin Pasamehmetoglu, 2022. "Employee mindfulness and creativity: when emotions and national culture matter," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5-6), pages 383-411, April.
    7. Muhammad Qamar Zia & Muhammad Naveed & Syeda Tayyaba Fasih & Muhammad Usman Aleem & Muhammad Sufyan Ramish, 2022. "The interactive effect of Islamic work ethics and leader-member exchange on workplace deviance behaviour and adaptive performance," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 530-548, February.
    8. Aryee, Samuel & Sun, Li-Yun & Chen, Zhen Xiong George & Debrah, Yaw A., 2008. "Abusive Supervision and Contextual Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 393-411, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farrukh Shahzad & Shahab Ali & Iftikhar Hussain & Li Sun & Chunlei Wang & Fayyaz Ahmad, 2023. "The Impact of Customer Incivility and Its Consequences on Hotel Employees: Mediating Role of Employees’ Emotional Exhaustion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Habiburrahman Abed & Habib Gul & Abdul Basir Azimi, 2023. "Examining the Moderating Role of Conscientiousness on Abusive Supervision and Emotional Exhaustion Leading to Employee Creativity," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 26(1), pages 103-123.
    3. Shahab Ali & Pu Yongjian & Farrukh Shahzad & Iftikhar Hussain & Dawei Zhang & Zeeshan Fareed & Filza Hameed & Chunlei Wang, 2022. "Abusive Supervision and Turnover Intentions: A Mediation-Moderation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei-Li Wu & Yi-Chih Lee, 2020. "Do Work Engagement and Transformational Leadership Facilitate Knowledge Sharing? A Perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Budhi Haryanto & Edi Cahyono, 2019. "Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Performance: The Role of Gender," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 305-311.
    3. Shahab Ali & Pu Yongjian & Farrukh Shahzad & Iftikhar Hussain & Dawei Zhang & Zeeshan Fareed & Filza Hameed & Chunlei Wang, 2022. "Abusive Supervision and Turnover Intentions: A Mediation-Moderation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Qin Xu & Guangxi Zhang & Andrew Chan, 2019. "Abusive Supervision and Subordinate Proactive Behavior: Joint Moderating Roles of Organizational Identification and Positive Affectivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 829-843, July.
    5. Arindam Bhattacharjee & Anita Sarkar, 2024. "Abusive supervision: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 1-34, February.
    6. Guanxing Xiong & Huadong Huang & Yingyi Ma & Cuiqi Liang & Haixia Wang, 2021. "Abusive Supervision and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: The Mediating Role of Status Challenge and the Moderating Role of Leader–Member Exchange," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    7. Yucheng Zhang & Zhenyu Liao, 2015. "Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 959-987, December.
    8. Kan Ouyang & Wing Lam & Weidong Wang, 2015. "Roles of gender and identification on abusive supervision and proactive behavior," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 671-691, September.
    9. Ifzal Ahmad & Khalida Begum, 2023. "Impact of abusive supervision on intention to leave: a moderated mediation model of organizational-based self esteem and emotional exhaustion," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 669-688, April.
    10. Xiao Yuan & Yaoshan Xu & Yongjuan Li, 2020. "Resource Depletion Perspective on the Link Between Abusive Supervision and Safety Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 213-228, February.
    11. De Clercq, Dirk & Haq, Inam Ul & Azeem, Muhammad Umer & Raja, Usman, 2018. "Family incivility, emotional exhaustion at work, and being a good soldier: The buffering roles of waypower and willpower," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 27-36.
    12. Yuhyung Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Seongho Kang, 2021. "Mistreatment from Multiple Sources: Interaction Effects of Abusive Supervision, Coworker Incivility, and Customer Incivility on Work Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Robin Snell & May Wong & Almaz Chak & Sandy Hui, 2013. "Representational predicaments at work: How they are experienced and why they may happen," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 251-279, March.
    14. Andrew Li & Chenwei Liao & Ping Shao & Jason Huang, 2022. "Angry but not Deviant: Employees’ Prior-Day Deviant Behavior Toward the Family Buffers Their Reactions to Abusive Supervisory Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 683-697, May.
    15. Jasim Mohammed Kareem, 2018. "Employee Silence an Outcome of Offensive Supervision: An investigation of Mediating Role of Justice Perception," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 11-15:4.
    16. Beini Liu & Qiang Lu & Yue Zhao & Jing Zhan, 2020. "Can the Psychosocial Safety Climate Reduce Ill-Health Presenteeism? Evidence from Chinese Healthcare Staff under a Dual Information Processing Path Lens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Chenlin Liu & Siwei Sun & Francisca N. Mapiye Dube, 2021. "The Buffering Effects of Subordinates’ Forgiveness and Communication Openness on Abusive Supervision and Voice Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    18. Maie Stein & Sylvie Vincent-Höper & Marlies Schümann & Sabine Gregersen, 2020. "Beyond Mistreatment at the Relationship Level: Abusive Supervision and Illegitimate Tasks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Yucheng Zhang & Timothy C. Bednall, 2016. "Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: a Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 455-471, December.
    20. Allan B. I. Bernardo & Mary Angeline A. Daganzo & Anna Carmella G. Ocampo, 2018. "Abusive Supervision and Well-Being of Filipino Migrant Workers in Macau: Consequences for Self-Esteem and Heritage Culture Detachment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 277-292, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8648-:d:862999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.