IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p8198-d856083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Trost

    (International Institute (IHI) Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Markt 23, 02763 Zittau, Germany)

  • Thorsten Claus

    (International Institute (IHI) Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Markt 23, 02763 Zittau, Germany)

  • Frank Herrmann

    (Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg, Innovation and Competence Centre for Production Logistics and Factory Planning (IPF), P.O. Box 12 03 27, 93025 Regensburg, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable production includes economic, environmental, and social aspects. However, social sustainability has received less attention, especially compared to the economic aspects. Next to technical and organizational measures, social improvements within supply chains can also be achieved through suitable production planning. Within production planning, production programs are determined, and the assignment of available resources (e.g., employees) is specified. Thus, the utilization and workload of employees are defined. This systematic literature review investigates to what extent such employee-related social aspects are reflected in production planning and discusses whether economic aspects dominate them. For this, a Scopus database search was carried out and 76 identified approaches were analyzed and categorized regarding the occurring employee-related social aspects and their implementation. Thus far, the approaches mainly consider single aspects on single planning levels. A consideration of a broad set of aspects along the entire production planning has rarely been studied. In particular, health and safety aspects are considered on the levels of assembly line balancing and job rotation. However, their impact is primarily determined by the specific settings of the decision-maker. To support decision-makers, only a few studies have investigated the effects based on real application scenarios. Further potential might be an extended modeling of social and economic interdependencies and a consideration of employee-related social aspects in medium- to long-term production planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2022. "Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8198-:d:856083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mossa, G. & Boenzi, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mummolo, G. & Romano, V.A., 2016. "Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: A job-rotation scheduling model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 471-477.
    2. Grosse, E. H. & Calzavara, M. & Glock, C. H. & Sgarbossa, F., 2017. "Incorporating human factors into decision support models for production and logistics: current state of research," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 88433, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Daria Battini & Martina Calzavara & Alena Otto & Fabio Sgarbossa, 2017. "Preventing ergonomic risks with integrated planning on assembly line balancing and parts feeding," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(24), pages 7452-7472, December.
    4. Ameni Azzouz & Meriem Ennigrou & Lamjed Ben Said, 2018. "Scheduling problems under learning effects: classification and cartography," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 1642-1661, February.
    5. Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Battaïa, Olga & Delorme, Xavier, 2021. "Ageing workforce effects in Dual-Resource Constrained job-shop scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Jonathan Asher Morashti & Youra An & Hyunmi Jang, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of Sustainable Packaging in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Alessandro Andriolo & Daria Battini & Alessandro Persona & Fabio Sgarbossa, 2016. "A new bi-objective approach for including ergonomic principles into EOQ model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 2610-2627, May.
    8. Leszek Koziol & Michal Koziol, 2020. "The concept of the trichotomy of motivating factors in the workplace," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 707-715, June.
    9. Najmeh Madadi & Kuan Yew Wong, 2014. "A Multiobjective Fuzzy Aggregate Production Planning Model Considering Real Capacity and Quality of Products," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-15, September.
    10. Alex J. Ruiz-Torres & Nelson Alomoto & Giuseppe Paletta & Eduardo Pérez, 2015. "Scheduling to maximise worker satisfaction and on-time orders," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 2836-2852, May.
    11. Bautista, Joaquín & Batalla-García, Cristina & Alfaro-Pozo, Rocío, 2016. "Models for assembly line balancing by temporal, spatial and ergonomic risk attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 814-829.
    12. Otto, Alena & Scholl, Armin, 2011. "Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 277-286, July.
    13. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 1999. "The economic manufacture/order quantity (EMQ/EOQ) and the learning curve: Past, present, and future," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 93-102, March.
    14. Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J. & Malekly, H. & Aryanezhad, M.B., 2011. "A multi-objective robust optimization model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a supply chain under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 28-42, November.
    15. Battini, Daria & Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2017. "Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 230-239.
    16. Hax, Arnoldo C. & Meal, Harlan C., 1973. "Hierarchical integration of production planning and scheduling," Working papers 656-73., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    17. Gahm, Christian & Denz, Florian & Dirr, Martin & Tuma, Axel, 2016. "Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 744-757.
    18. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    19. Azizi, Nader & Zolfaghari, Saeed & Liang, Ming, 2010. "Modeling job rotation in manufacturing systems: The study of employee's boredom and skill variations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 69-85, January.
    20. Ozdemir, Rifat & Sarigol, Ilkan & AlMutairi, Sarah & AlMeea, Sarah & Murad, Abrar & Naqi, Aseel & AlNasser, Noor, 2021. "Fuzzy multi-objective model for assembly line balancing with ergonomic risks consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    21. Niloofar Katiraee & Martina Calzavara & Serena Finco & Daria Battini & Olga Battaïa, 2021. "Consideration of workers’ differences in production systems modelling and design: State of the art and directions for future research," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(11), pages 3237-3268, June.
    22. Daria Battini & Xavier Delorme & Alexandre Dolgui & Alessandro Persona & Fabio Sgarbossa, 2016. "Ergonomics in assembly line balancing based on energy expenditure: a multi-objective model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 824-845, February.
    23. Hajo Terbrack & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2021. "Energy-Oriented Production Planning in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Classification Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, December.
    24. Biskup, Dirk, 2008. "A state-of-the-art review on scheduling with learning effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 315-329, July.
    25. N Azizi & M Liang, 2013. "An integrated approach to worker assignment, workforce flexibility acquisition, and task rotation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(2), pages 260-275, February.
    26. Thun, Jörn-Henrik & Lehr, Christian B. & Bierwirth, Max, 2011. "Feel free to feel comfortable--An empirical analysis of ergonomics in the German automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 551-561, October.
    27. Sgarbossa, F. & Battini, D. & Glock, C. H. & Grosse, E. H. & Persona, A., 2017. "Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84857, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    28. Ahlers, Elke, 2017. "Work and health in German companies: Findings from the WSI works councils survey 2015," WSI Reports 33e, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2023. "Master Production Scheduling with Consideration of Utilization-Dependent Exhaustion and Capacity Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Valentina De Simone & Valentina Di Pasquale & Maria Elena Nenni & Salvatore Miranda, 2023. "Sustainable Production Planning and Control in Manufacturing Contexts: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Battini, Daria & Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Zennaro, Ilenia & Das, Ajay, 2022. "Towards industry 5.0: A multi-objective job rotation model for an inclusive workforce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2023. "Master Production Scheduling with Consideration of Utilization-Dependent Exhaustion and Capacity Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Boysen, Nils & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2022. "Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 797-814.
    4. Ozdemir, Rifat & Sarigol, Ilkan & AlMutairi, Sarah & AlMeea, Sarah & Murad, Abrar & Naqi, Aseel & AlNasser, Noor, 2021. "Fuzzy multi-objective model for assembly line balancing with ergonomic risks consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    5. Battini, Daria & Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Zennaro, Ilenia & Das, Ajay, 2022. "Towards industry 5.0: A multi-objective job rotation model for an inclusive workforce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Corominas, Albert & Olivella, Jordi & Pastor, Rafael, 2010. "A model for the assignment of a set of tasks when work performance depends on experience of all tasks involved," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 335-340, August.
    7. Lucas Dias Condeixa & Pierry Silva & Diego Moah & Brenda Farias & Adriana Leiras, 2022. "Evaluating cost impacts on reverse logistics using an Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model with environmental and social considerations," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 921-940, September.
    8. Tiacci, Lorenzo & Mimmi, Mario, 2018. "Integrating ergonomic risks evaluation through OCRA index and balancing/sequencing decisions for mixed model stochastic asynchronous assembly lines," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 112-138.
    9. Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Battaïa, Olga & Delorme, Xavier, 2021. "Ageing workforce effects in Dual-Resource Constrained job-shop scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Francisco Campuzano-Bolarín & Fulgencio Marín-García & José Andrés Moreno-Nicolás & Marija Bogataj & David Bogataj, 2019. "Supply Chain Risk of Obsolescence at Simultaneous Robust Perturbations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Catanzaro, Daniele & Pesenti, Raffaele & Ronco, Roberto, 2023. "Job scheduling under Time-of-Use energy tariffs for sustainable manufacturing: a survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1091-1109.
    12. Radosław Rudek, 2012. "Scheduling problems with position dependent job processing times: computational complexity results," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 491-516, July.
    13. Wang, Xiong & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Multi-objective competency-based approach to project scheduling and staff assignment: Case study of an internal audit project," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Hongyu He & Yanzhi Zhao & Xiaojun Ma & Yuan-Yuan Lu & Na Ren & Ji-Bo Wang, 2023. "Study on Scheduling Problems with Learning Effects and Past Sequence Delivery Times," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Bakker, Steffen J. & Wang, Akang & Gounaris, Chrysanthos E., 2021. "Vehicle routing with endogenous learning: Application to offshore plug and abandonment campaign planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 93-106.
    16. Diefenbach, Heiko & Emde, Simon & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Loading tow trains ergonomically for just-in-time part supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 325-344.
    17. Ji-Bo Wang & Ming-Zheng Wang, 2011. "Worst-case behavior of simple sequencing rules in flow shop scheduling with general position-dependent learning effects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 155-169, November.
    18. Förster, Bernadette, 2015. "Technology foresight for sustainable production in the German automotive supplier industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 237-248.
    19. Vahid Reza Soleymanfar & Ahmad Makui & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2022. "Sustainable EOQ and EPQ models for a two-echelon multi-product supply chain with return policy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5317-5343, April.
    20. Xu, Shuling & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Fatigue, personnel scheduling and operations: Review and research opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 807-822.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8198-:d:856083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.