IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v15y2025ics2214716025000260.html

The interplay between learning effect and order acceptance in production planning

Author

Listed:
  • Ying, Kuo-Ching
  • Pourhejazy, Pourya
  • Zhou, Wei-Jie

Abstract

Learning takes time and hence its effects should be considered in short-term production planning (i.e., scheduling). This is especially true when human involvement is high and the shop floor experiences changes in workflow, workforce, or technology. The Single-Machine Scheduling Problem (SMSP) with the learning effect is considered to explore this interplay. The study first proves that the shortest processing time scheduling rule can solve the mathematical problems. Pseudo-polynomial solution algorithms based on Dynamic Programming (DP) are developed to solve the SMSPs with learning effects and job rejection to minimize the maximum completion time (makespan), total completion time, and total tardiness, separately. We found that the algorithms tend to reject a small number of orders with longer production times and retain more of those with shorter production times when the objective is to minimize the average response time for the new orders. This is contrary to situations when the system’s resource utilization or the delays in fulfilling demand are sought to be minimized. The study also found that orders requiring longer processing times should be scheduled later to improve all three performance metrics with higher learning rates. Finally, we establish that all three extended problems are solvable in pseudo-polynomial time, with complexities of O(n2E) for makespan and total completion time minimization, and O(n2PE) for total tardiness minimization. The DP algorithms efficiently solve practical-sized instances, as validated by numerical experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying, Kuo-Ching & Pourhejazy, Pourya & Zhou, Wei-Jie, 2025. "The interplay between learning effect and order acceptance in production planning," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:15:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000260
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2025.100350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716025000260
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2025.100350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baruch Mor & Dana Shapira, 2019. "Improved algorithms for scheduling on proportionate flowshop with job-rejection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(11), pages 1997-2003, November.
    2. Baruch Mor & Dana Shapira, 2020. "Scheduling with regular performance measures and optional job rejection on a single machine," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(8), pages 1315-1325, August.
    3. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov & Dana Shapira, 2020. "Flowshop scheduling with learning effect and job rejection," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 631-641, December.
    4. Baruch Mor, 2023. "Single machine scheduling problems involving job-dependent step-deterioration dates and job rejection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Biskup, Dirk, 1999. "Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 173-178, May.
    6. Chen, Xi & Li, Kaiwen & Lin, Sidian & Ding, Xiaosong, 2024. "Technician routing and scheduling with employees’ learning through implicit cross-training strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Mosheiov, Gur, 2001. "Scheduling problems with a learning effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 687-693, August.
    8. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2016. "Minimizing maximum cost on a single machine with two competing agents and job rejection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1524-1531, December.
    9. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2021. "A note on the single machine CON and CONW problems with lot scheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 327-338, August.
    10. Ameni Azzouz & Meriem Ennigrou & Lamjed Ben Said, 2018. "Scheduling problems under learning effects: classification and cartography," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 1642-1661, February.
    11. Zheng Liu & Ji-Bo Wang, 2024. "Single-Machine Scheduling with Simultaneous Learning Effects and Delivery Times," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Biskup, Dirk, 2008. "A state-of-the-art review on scheduling with learning effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 315-329, July.
    13. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov & Dana Shapira, 2021. "Single machine lot scheduling with optional job-rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-11, January.
    14. Enrique Gerstl & Gur Mosheiov, 2017. "Single machine scheduling problems with generalised due-dates and job-rejection," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(11), pages 3164-3172, June.
    15. Yurong Zhang & Xinyu Sun & Tao Liu & Jiayin Wang & Xin-Na Geng, 2025. "Single-machine scheduling simultaneous consideration of resource allocations and exponential time-dependent learning effects," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 528-540, March.
    16. Aiping Jiang & Lin Li & Xuemin Xu & David Y. C. Huang, 2024. "The effects of dynamic learning and the forgetting process on an optimising modelling for full-service repair pricing contracts for medical devices," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(10), pages 1910-1924, October.
    17. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & El Saadany, Ahmed M.A., 2011. "An economic production and remanufacturing model with learning effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 115-127, May.
    18. Xueling Zhong & Zhangming Pan & Dakui Jiang, 2017. "Scheduling with release times and rejection on two parallel machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 934-944, April.
    19. Ervural, Bilal & Özaydın, Ali, 2024. "Integrated order acceptance and inventory policy optimization in a multi-period, multi-product hybrid production system," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).
    20. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng & Cheng-Wen Jiao, 2019. "Parallel-machine scheduling with job-dependent cumulative deterioration effect and rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 957-971, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov & Dana Shapira, 2020. "Flowshop scheduling with learning effect and job rejection," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 631-641, December.
    2. Huang, Xue & He, Hongyu & Bei, Hong-Bin & Zhao, Yanzhi & Wang, Ning & Chang, Yu, 2025. "Group-scheduling with simultaneous learning effects and convex resource allocations," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    3. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2021. "A note: flowshop scheduling with linear deterioration and job-rejection," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 103-111, March.
    4. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    5. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov & Dana Shapira, 2021. "Single machine lot scheduling with optional job-rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Heuser, Patricia & Letmathe, Peter & Vossen, Thomas, 2025. "Skill development in the field of scheduling: A structured literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 697-716.
    7. Xingong Zhang & Guangle Yan & Wanzhen Huang & Guochun Tang, 2011. "Single-machine scheduling problems with time and position dependent processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 345-356, June.
    8. Finke, Gerd & Gara-Ali, Ahmed & Espinouse, Marie-Laure & Jost, Vincent & Moncel, Julien, 2017. "Unified matrix approach to solve production-maintenance problems on a single machine," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 140-146.
    9. Kai-biao Sun & Hong-xing Li, 2009. "Some single-machine scheduling problems with actual time and position dependent learning effects," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 161-177, June.
    10. Frederik Ferid Ostermeier & Jochen Deuse, 2024. "Modelling forgetting due to intermittent production in mixed-model line scheduling," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 503-532, June.
    11. Matan Atsmony & Gur Mosheiov, 2023. "Scheduling to maximize the weighted number of on-time jobs on parallel machines with bounded job-rejection," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 193-207, April.
    12. Hongyu He & Yanzhi Zhao & Xiaojun Ma & Yuan-Yuan Lu & Na Ren & Ji-Bo Wang, 2023. "Study on Scheduling Problems with Learning Effects and Past Sequence Delivery Times," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Qian, Jianbo & Steiner, George, 2013. "Fast algorithms for scheduling with learning effects and time-dependent processing times on a single machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 547-551.
    14. Ji-Bo Wang & Ming-Zheng Wang, 2011. "Worst-case behavior of simple sequencing rules in flow shop scheduling with general position-dependent learning effects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 155-169, November.
    15. Shang-Chia Liu, 2015. "Common Due-Window Assignment and Group Scheduling with Position-Dependent Processing Times," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(06), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Lai, Peng-Jen & Lee, Wen-Chiung, 2011. "Single-machine scheduling with general sum-of-processing-time-based and position-based learning effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 467-471, October.
    17. Zong-Jun Wei & Li-Yan Wang & Lei Zhang & Ji-Bo Wang & Ershen Wang, 2023. "Single-Machine Maintenance Activity Scheduling with Convex Resource Constraints and Learning Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov, 2018. "A note: minimizing total absolute deviation of job completion times on unrelated machines with general position-dependent processing times and job-rejection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1079-1085, December.
    19. Baruch Mor, 2019. "Minmax scheduling problems with common due-date and completion time penalty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 50-71, July.
    20. Mosheiov, Gur & Oron, Daniel & Shabtay, Dvir, 2021. "Minimizing total late work on a single machine with generalized due-dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 837-846.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:15:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.