IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6816-d1126512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Master Production Scheduling with Consideration of Utilization-Dependent Exhaustion and Capacity Load

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Trost

    (International Institute (IHI) Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Markt 23, 02763 Zittau, Germany)

  • Thorsten Claus

    (International Institute (IHI) Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Markt 23, 02763 Zittau, Germany)

  • Frank Herrmann

    (Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg, Innovation and Competence Centre for Production Logisticsand Factory Planning (IPF), 93025 Regensburg, Germany)

Abstract

A large number of researchers have addressed social aspects in hierarchical production planning. This article responds to research gaps identified in our previous literature review. Accordingly, consideration of social aspects and the economic implications of social improvements are required in a longer term planning approach. For this, we integrate work intensity as employee utilization in a general mixed-integer programming model for master production scheduling. Following existing fatigue functions, we represent the relationship between work intensity and exhaustion through an employee-utilization-dependent exhaustion function. We account for the economic implications through exhaustion-dependent capacity load factors. We solve our model with a CPLEX standard solver and analyze a case study based on a realistic production system and numerical data. We demonstrate that the consideration of economic implications is necessary to evaluate social improvements. Otherwise, monetary disadvantages are overestimated, and social improvements are, thus, negatively affected. Moreover, from a certain level of work-intensity reduction, demand peaks are smoothed more by pre-production, which requires more core employees, while temporary employment is reduced. Further potential may arise from considering and quantifying other interdependencies, such as employee exhaustion and employee days off. In addition, the relationship between social working conditions and employee turnover can be integrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2023. "Master Production Scheduling with Consideration of Utilization-Dependent Exhaustion and Capacity Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6816-:d:1126512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2022. "Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Mazzola, Joseph B. & Neebe, Alan W. & Rump, Christopher M., 1998. "Multiproduct production planning in the presence of work-force learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 336-356, April.
    3. Mossa, G. & Boenzi, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mummolo, G. & Romano, V.A., 2016. "Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: A job-rotation scheduling model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 471-477.
    4. Marco Trost & Enrico Teich & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2017. "Ein lineares Optimierungsmodell zur Hauptproduktionsprogrammplanung mit Berücksichtigung sozialer Größen [A linear optimisation model for master production scheduling including social criteria]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 71-80, June.
    5. Grosse, E. H. & Calzavara, M. & Glock, C. H. & Sgarbossa, F., 2017. "Incorporating human factors into decision support models for production and logistics: current state of research," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 88433, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Leszek Koziol & Michal Koziol, 2020. "The concept of the trichotomy of motivating factors in the workplace," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 707-715, June.
    7. Najmeh Madadi & Kuan Yew Wong, 2014. "A Multiobjective Fuzzy Aggregate Production Planning Model Considering Real Capacity and Quality of Products," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-15, September.
    8. Bautista, Joaquín & Batalla-García, Cristina & Alfaro-Pozo, Rocío, 2016. "Models for assembly line balancing by temporal, spatial and ergonomic risk attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 814-829.
    9. Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J. & Malekly, H. & Aryanezhad, M.B., 2011. "A multi-objective robust optimization model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a supply chain under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 28-42, November.
    10. Battini, Daria & Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2017. "Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 230-239.
    11. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    12. Bentao Su & Naiming Xie, 2020. "Single workgroup scheduling problem with variable processing personnel," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 671-684, June.
    13. Hajo Terbrack & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2021. "Energy-Oriented Production Planning in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Classification Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, December.
    14. Thun, Jörn-Henrik & Lehr, Christian B. & Bierwirth, Max, 2011. "Feel free to feel comfortable--An empirical analysis of ergonomics in the German automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 551-561, October.
    15. Sgarbossa, F. & Battini, D. & Glock, C. H. & Grosse, E. H. & Persona, A., 2017. "Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84857, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Aziz, Ridwan Al & Paul, Himangshu Kumar & Karim, Touseef Mashrurul & Ahmed, Imtiaz & Azeem, Abdullahil, 2018. "Modeling and optimization of multi-layer aggregate production planning," Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management (JOSCM), Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (FGV EAESP), vol. 11(2), December.
    17. Ahlers, Elke, 2017. "Work and health in German companies: Findings from the WSI works councils survey 2015," WSI Reports 33e, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2022. "Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Förster, Bernadette, 2015. "Technology foresight for sustainable production in the German automotive supplier industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 237-248.
    3. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    4. Vahid Reza Soleymanfar & Ahmad Makui & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2022. "Sustainable EOQ and EPQ models for a two-echelon multi-product supply chain with return policy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5317-5343, April.
    5. Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J. & Baboli, A. & Sazvar, Z., 2013. "A stochastic aggregate production planning model in a green supply chain: Considering flexible lead times, nonlinear purchase and shortage cost functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 26-41.
    6. Lucas Dias Condeixa & Pierry Silva & Diego Moah & Brenda Farias & Adriana Leiras, 2022. "Evaluating cost impacts on reverse logistics using an Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model with environmental and social considerations," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 921-940, September.
    7. Ozdemir, Rifat & Sarigol, Ilkan & AlMutairi, Sarah & AlMeea, Sarah & Murad, Abrar & Naqi, Aseel & AlNasser, Noor, 2021. "Fuzzy multi-objective model for assembly line balancing with ergonomic risks consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    8. Nurjanni, Kartina Puji & Carvalho, Maria S. & Costa, Lino, 2017. "Green supply chain design: A mathematical modeling approach based on a multi-objective optimization model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 421-432.
    9. Francisco Campuzano-Bolarín & Fulgencio Marín-García & José Andrés Moreno-Nicolás & Marija Bogataj & David Bogataj, 2019. "Supply Chain Risk of Obsolescence at Simultaneous Robust Perturbations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Battini, Daria & Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Zennaro, Ilenia & Das, Ajay, 2022. "Towards industry 5.0: A multi-objective job rotation model for an inclusive workforce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Maximilian Zarte & Agnes Pechmann & Isabel L. Nunes, 2021. "Fuzzy Inference Model for Decision Support in Sustainable Production Planning Processes—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    12. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    13. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    14. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    15. Jim Butcher, 2006. "The United Nations International Year of Ecotourism: a critical analysis of development implications," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(2), pages 146-156, April.
    16. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    17. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    18. Megan Devonald & Nicola Jones & Sally Youssef, 2022. "‘We Have No Hope for Anything’: Exploring Interconnected Economic, Social and Environmental Risks to Adolescents in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Rigby, Dan & Woodhouse, Phil & Young, Trevor & Burton, Michael, 2001. "Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 463-478, December.
    20. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6816-:d:1126512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.