IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7407-d840931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Total Factor Productivity of Rice in China and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Liting Gao

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Qianhui Gao

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Marcin Lorenc

    (Department of Management and Production Engineering, Opole University of Technology, 45-758 Opole, Poland)

Abstract

Because rice is one of China’s staple foods, studying the total factor productivity (TFP) of rice is of great importance for China’s food security. There are many similarities between rice production in China and Japan. Japan has achieved an effective supply of high-quality rice under the constraints of insufficient production resources and limited environmental capacity. In this paper, we use the DEA Malmquist index method to comparatively analyze the production efficiency of the rice industry in China and Japan, as well as its trends and changes. The contribution of each decomposition index is analyzed by using grey correlation, and kernel density estimation is used to analyze the dynamic evolution of rice productivity in both countries. The empirical results show that rice TFP in Japan is higher than that in China. Technological progress is an important driver of TFP and is the main reason for the difference in rice TFP between the two countries. The concentration of rice TFP distribution in China is decreasing, and regional differences are increasing, whereas in Japan, the opposite trend is observed, with the proportion of areas of high TFP increasing in both countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Liting Gao & Qianhui Gao & Marcin Lorenc, 2022. "Comparison of Total Factor Productivity of Rice in China and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7407-:d:840931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7407/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7407/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim J. Coelli & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2005. "Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 115-134, January.
    2. Caves, Douglas W & Christensen, Laurits R & Diewert, W Erwin, 1982. "The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1393-1414, November.
    3. Muhammad Umer Arshad & Yuanfeng Zhao & Omer Hanif & Faiza Fatima, 2022. "Evolution of Overall Cotton Production and Its Determinants: Implications for Developing Countries Using Pakistan Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Dan Pan, 2014. "The Impact of Agricultural Extension on Farmer Nutrient Management Behavior in Chinese Rice Production: A Household-Level Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Katsunobu Kondo & Yasutaka Yamamoto & Jun Sasaki, 2017. "Total Factor Productivity of the Japanese Rice Industry," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 31(4), pages 331-353, December.
    6. Lin, Bin & Wang, Xiaoxi & Jin, Songqing & Yang, Wanjiang & Li, Houjian, 2022. "Impacts of cooperative membership on rice productivity: Evidence from China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Sha, Wenbiao & Chen, Fengbo & Mishra, Ashok K., 2019. "Adoption of direct seeded rice, land use and enterprise income: Evidence from Chinese rice producers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 564-570.
    8. Hai-Dang Nguyen & Thanh Ngo & Tu DQ Le & Huong Ho & Hai T.H. Nguyen, 2019. "The Role of Knowledge in Sustainable Agriculture: Evidence from Rice Farms’ Technical Efficiency in Hanoi, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-10, April.
    9. Md Kamrul Hossain & Anton Abdulbasah Kamil & Md Azizul Baten & Adli Mustafa, 2012. "Stochastic Frontier Approach and Data Envelopment Analysis to Total Factor Productivity and Efficiency Measurement of Bangladeshi Rice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, October.
    10. Devkota, Krishna Prasad & Devkota, Mina & Paudel, Gokul Prasad & McDonald, Andrew James, 2021. "Coupling landscape-scale diagnostics surveys, on-farm experiments, and simulation to identify entry points for sustainably closing rice yield gaps in Nepal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Chieko Umetsu & Thamana Lekprichakul & Ujjayant Chakravorty, 2003. "Efficiency and Technical Change in the Philippine Rice Sector: A Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 943-963.
    12. Emmanuel Donkor & Nicolette Matthews & Abiodun A. Ogundeji, 2018. "Efficiency of Rice Farming in Ghana: Policy Implications for Rice Sector Development," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 149-161, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos & Georgios Kleftodimos & George Vlontzos & Panos M. Pardalos, 2023. "A systematic literature review of data envelopment analysis implementation in agriculture under the prism of sustainability," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-38, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelvin Balcombe & Sophia Davidova & Laure Latruffe, 2008. "The use of bootstrapped Malmquist indices to reassess productivity change findings: an application to a sample of Polish farms," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(16), pages 2055-2061.
    2. K Hervé Dakpo & Yann Desjeux & Philippe Jeanneaux & Laure Latruffe, 2017. "Productivity, technical efficiency and technological change in French agriculture during 2002-2014: A Färe-Primont index decomposition," Working Papers SMART 17-07, INRAE UMR SMART.
    3. Mita Bagchi & Sanzidur Rahman & Yao Shunbo, 2019. "Growth in Agricultural Productivity and Its Components in Bangladeshi Regions (1987–2009): An Application of Bootstrapped Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Amer Ait Sidhoum, 2023. "Measuring farm productivity under production uncertainty," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(4), pages 672-687, October.
    5. Chao Zhang & Ruifa Hu, 2022. "Adoption of Direct Seeding, Yield and Fertilizer Use in Rice Production: Empirical Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Nin Pratt, Alejandro & Yu, Bingxin, 2008. "An updated look at the recovery of agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa:," IFPRI discussion papers 787, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Mounir Belloumi & Mohamed Salah Matoussi, 2008. "Measuring Agricultural Productivity Growth in MENA Countries," Working Papers 416, Economic Research Forum, revised 06 Jan 2008.
    8. Houyem Zrelli & Abdullah H. Alsharif & Iskander Tlili, 2020. "Malmquist Indexes of Productivity Change in Tunisian Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Reziti, Ioanna, 2019. "Total factor productivity change of agriculture in five Southern European countries," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 2).
    10. Olson, Kent D. & Vu, Linh, 2009. "Productivity Growth, Technical Efficiency and Technical Change on Minnesota Farms," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49204, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Christopher J. O'Donnell, 2010. "Measuring and decomposing agricultural productivity and profitability change ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(4), pages 527-560, October.
    12. Yu, Bingxin & Nin Pratt, Alejandro, 2011. "Agricultural Productivity and Policies in Sub-Saharan Africa," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 105400, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Laborde, David & Piñeiro, Valeria, 2018. "Monitoring agricultural productivity for sustainable production and R&D planning," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-11.
    14. Bhushan, S., 2016. "TFP Growth of Wheat and Paddy in Post-Green Revolution Era in India: Parametric and Non-Parametric Analysis," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 29(1).
    15. Tomas Baležentis, 2014. "Total factor productivity in the Lithuanian family farms after accession to the EU: application of the bias-corrected Malmquist indices," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(4), pages 731-746, November.
    16. Shilpa Chaudhary, 2012. "Trends in Total Factor Productivity in Indian Agriculture: State-level Evidence using non-parametric Sequential Malmquist Index," Working papers 215, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    17. Md Ali & K. Klein, 2014. "Water Use Efficiency and Productivity of the Irrigation Districts in Southern Alberta," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(10), pages 2751-2766, August.
    18. Tae Hoon Oum & Katsuhiro Yamaguchi & Yuichiro Yoshida, 2011. "Efficiency Measurement Theory and its Application to Airport Benchmarking," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Kurup, Suresh & Jha, Girish & Singh, Alka, 2015. "Technical and efficiency changes in oilseed sector in India: Implications for policy," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212017, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Dakpo, K Hervé & Desjeux, Yann & Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Productivity, efficiency and technological change in French agriculture during 2002-2014: A Färe-Primont index decomposition," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 244793, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7407-:d:840931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.