IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6651-d827161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extreme Gradient Boosting-Based Machine Learning Approach for Green Building Cost Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Odey Alshboul

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa 13133, Jordan)

  • Ali Shehadeh

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Hijjawi Faculty for Engineering Technology, Yarmouk University, Shafiq Irshidatst, Irbid 21163, Jordan)

  • Ghassan Almasabha

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa 13133, Jordan)

  • Ali Saeed Almuflih

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, King Khalid University, King Fahad St., Guraiger, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Accurate building construction cost prediction is critical, especially for sustainable projects (i.e., green buildings). Green building construction contracts are relatively new to the construction industry, where stakeholders have limited experience in contract cost estimation. Unlike conventional building construction, green buildings are designed to utilize new technologies to reduce their operations’ environmental and societal impacts. Consequently, green buildings’ construction bidding and awarding processes have become more complicated due to difficulties forecasting the initial construction costs and setting integrated selection criteria for the winning bidders. Thus, robust green building cost prediction modeling is essential to provide stakeholders with an initial construction cost benchmark to enhance decision-making. The current study presents machine learning-based algorithms, including extreme gradient boosting (XGBOOST), deep neural network (DNN), and random forest (RF), to predict green building costs. The proposed models are designed to consider the influence of soft and hard cost-related attributes. Evaluation metrics (i.e., MAE, MSE, MAPE, and R 2 ) are applied to evaluate and compare the developed algorithms’ accuracy. XGBOOST provided the highest accuracy of 0.96 compared to 0.91 for the DNN, followed by RF with an accuracy of 0.87. The proposed machine learning models can be utilized as a decision support tool for construction project managers and practitioners to advance automation as a coherent field of research within the green construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Odey Alshboul & Ali Shehadeh & Ghassan Almasabha & Ali Saeed Almuflih, 2022. "Extreme Gradient Boosting-Based Machine Learning Approach for Green Building Cost Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6651-:d:827161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6651/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6651/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiba Najini & Mutasim Nour & Sulaiman Al-Zuhair & Fadi Ghaith, 2020. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Green Building Codes in United Arab Emirates Based on a Case Study Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Edyta Plebankiewicz & Michał Juszczyk & Renata Kozik, 2019. "Trends, Costs, and Benefits of Green Certification of Office Buildings: A Polish Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Chrisna Du Plessis, 2007. "A strategic framework for sustainable construction in developing countries," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 67-76.
    4. Janitza, Silke & Tutz, Gerhard & Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, 2016. "Random forest for ordinal responses: Prediction and variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 57-73.
    5. Hui-Ching Hsieh & Viona Claresta & Thi Minh Ngoc Bui, 2020. "Green Building, Cost of Equity Capital and Corporate Governance: Evidence from US Real Estate Investment Trusts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Quangdung Tran & Sajjad Nazir & Tu-Hieu Nguyen & Ngoc-Khoa Ho & Tuan-Hai Dinh & Viet-Phuong Nguyen & Manh-Hung Nguyen & Quoc-Khanh Phan & The-Son Kieu, 2020. "Empirical Examination of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Green Building Technologies: The Perspective of Construction Developers in Developing Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Chen-Yi Sun & Yin-Guang Chen & Rong-Jing Wang & Shih-Chi Lo & Jyh-Tyng Yau & Ya-Wen Wu, 2019. "Construction Cost of Green Building Certified Residence: A Case Study in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Wei-Shiun Chang & Bo Chen & Timothy C. Salmon, 2015. "An Investigation of the Average Bid Mechanism for Procurement Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1237-1254, June.
    9. Danny Myers, 2005. "A review of construction companies' attitudes to sustainability," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 781-785.
    10. Ke Fan & Edwin H. W. Chan & C. K. Chau, 2018. "Costs and Benefits of Implementing Green Building Economic Incentives: Case Study of a Gross Floor Area Concession Scheme in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Skitmore, Martin, 2002. "Identifying non-competitive bids in construction contract auctions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 443-449, December.
    12. Odey Alshboul & Mohammad A. Alzubaidi & Rabia Emhamed Al Mamlook & Ghassan Almasabha & Ali Saeed Almuflih & Ali Shehadeh, 2022. "Forecasting Liquidated Damages via Machine Learning-Based Modified Regression Models for Highway Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhi-Jun Li & Kabiru Adamu & Kai Yan & Xiu-Li Xu & Peng Shao & Xue-Hong Li & Hafsat Muhammad Bashir, 2022. "Detection of Nut–Bolt Loss in Steel Bridges Using Deep Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Shaoliang Li & Xiazhong Zheng & Qin Zeng, 2023. "Can Green Finance Drive the Development of the Green Building Industry?—Based on the Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Odey Alshboul & Ali Shehadeh & Rabia Emhamed Al Mamlook & Ghassan Almasabha & Ali Saeed Almuflih & Saleh Y. Alghamdi, 2022. "Prediction Liquidated Damages via Ensemble Machine Learning Model: Towards Sustainable Highway Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Eva Trinkuniene & Aurelija Burinskiene & Raimonda Bubliene, 2025. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach COPRAS for Developing Sustainable Building Practices in the European Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Wei Cao & Zheng Wan & Wenjing Li, 2023. "Stability of Unsaturated Soil Slope Considering Stratigraphic Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Hao Wang & Chen Peng & Bolin Liao & Xinwei Cao & Shuai Li, 2023. "Wind Power Forecasting Based on WaveNet and Multitask Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Zihan Zhang & Wanjiang Wang & Junkang Song & Zhe Wang & Weiyi Wang, 2022. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Ultra-Low Energy Consumption Buildings in Severely Cold Regions Considering Life Cycle Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Chun-Wei Chen, 2023. "A Feasibility Discussion: Is ML Suitable for Predicting Sustainable Patterns in Consumer Product Preferences?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Chengguang Liu & Jiaqi Zhang & Xixi Luo & Yulin Yang & Chao Hu, 2023. "Railway Freight Demand Forecasting Based on Multiple Factors: Grey Relational Analysis and Deep Autoencoder Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Hina Inam & Naeem Ul Islam & Muhammad Usman Akram & Fahim Ullah, 2023. "Smart and Automated Infrastructure Management: A Deep Learning Approach for Crack Detection in Bridge Images," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-35, January.
    11. I Gede Nyoman Mindra Jaya & Yudhie Andriyana & Bertho Tantular & Sinta Septi Pangastuti & Farah Kristiani, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Dengue Forecasting for Sustainable Public Health in Bandung, Indonesia: A Comparative Study of Classical, Machine Learning, and Bayesian Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Hassam Ishfaq & Sania Kanwal & Sadeed Anwar & Mubarak Abdussalam & Waqas Amin, 2025. "Enhancing Smart Grid Security and Efficiency: AI, Energy Routing, and T&D Innovations (A Review)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-77, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Ioannis Vannas & George Xydis & Constantinos Vassiliades, 2023. "Homeowners’ Perceptions of Renewable Energy and Market Value of Sustainable Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Chuhan Chen & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2023. "The Influence of Multistakeholder Value Cognition and Risk Attitudes on Sustainable Interior Landscape Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Yiwei Fan & Jiaqi Gu & Guosheng Yin, 2023. "Sparse concordance‐based ordinal classification," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 50(3), pages 934-961, September.
    4. Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Alex Opoku & Zainab Dangana, 2024. "Sustainability assessment frameworks for delivering Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) targets: A case of Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) UK New Const," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3779-3791, September.
    5. repec:osf:osfxxx:v7bcf_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Shaoyang Ren & Yinan Li & Zhen Peng & Mingqiang Yin & Xiao Liu, 2024. "Developing an Urban Environment Examination System by Incorporating Construction, Economic, Environmental, Cultural and Development Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, April.
    7. Stefano Galavotti & Luigi Moretti & Paola Valbonesi, 2018. "Sophisticated Bidders in Beauty-Contest Auctions," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, November.
    8. repec:osf:osfxxx:h8t4p_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Jin Kook Yang & Le Dinh Thuc & Pham Phu Cuong & Nguyen Van Du & Huu‐Bang Tran, 2023. "Evaluating a driving index of nonresidential green building implementation for sustainable development in developing countries from a Vietnamese perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1720-1734, June.
    10. Sayani Saha & Rahul B Hiremath & Sanjay Prasad & Bimlesh Kumar, 2021. "Barriers to Adoption of Commercial Green Buildings in India: A Review," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 13(2), pages 107-128, December.
    11. Michal Gluszak & Agnieszka Malkowska & Bartłomiej Marona, 2021. "Green Building Adoption on Office Markets in Europe: An Empirical Investigation into LEED Certification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Gairaa, Kacem & Voyant, Cyril & Notton, Gilles & Benkaciali, Saïd & Guermoui, Mawloud, 2022. "Contribution of ordinal variables to short-term global solar irradiation forecasting for sites with low variabilities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 890-902.
    13. Zhao, Yu & Gao, Gege & Zhang, Jixiang & Yu, Miao, 2024. "Impact of carbon tax on green building development: An evolutionary game analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    14. Maria Unuigbe & Sambo Lyson Zulu & David Johnston, 2022. "Exploring Factors Influencing Renewable Energy Diffusion in Commercial Buildings in Nigeria: A Grounded Theory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-32, August.
    15. Wei-Shiun Chang & Timothy C. Salmon & Krista J. Saral, 2016. "Procurement Auctions With Renegotiation And Wealth Constraints," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(3), pages 1684-1704, July.
    16. Alena Tažiková & Zuzana Struková & Mária Kozlovská, 2023. "An Analysis of Real Site Operation Time in Construction of Residential Buildings in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    17. Decio Coviello & Andrea Guglielmo & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2015. "The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance," CEIS Research Paper 361, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 17 Nov 2015.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0210426 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jinding Xing & Kunhui Ye & Jian Zuo & Weiyan Jiang, 2018. "Control Dust Pollution on Construction Sites: What Governments Do in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Hsu, Ching-Chi & Ngo, Quang-Thanh & Chien, FengSheng & Li, Li & Mohsin, Muhammad, 2021. "Evaluating green innovation and performance of financial development: mediating concerns of environmental regulation," MPRA Paper 109671, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Lin, Chun Liang & Chan, Edwin H.W. & Chiang, Wei-Hwa, 2022. "Urban renewal governance and manipulation of plot ratios: A comparison between Taipei, Hong Kong and, Singapore," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    22. Michael Lechner & Gabriel Okasa, 2025. "Random Forest estimation of the ordered choice model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 1-106, January.
    23. Decio Coviello & Andrea Guglielmo & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2018. "The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 715-738, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6651-:d:827161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.