IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3740-d1638995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach COPRAS for Developing Sustainable Building Practices in the European Region

Author

Listed:
  • Jurgita Raudeliuniene

    (Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship Department, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University—Vilnius Tech, Saulėtekio av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Eva Trinkuniene

    (Business Management Faculty, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University—Vilnius Tech, Saulėtekio av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Aurelija Burinskiene

    (Business Management Faculty, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University—Vilnius Tech, Saulėtekio av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Raimonda Bubliene

    (Business Management Faculty, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University—Vilnius Tech, Saulėtekio av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Sustainable building practices face various problematic areas in the European region, such as climate change, high initial costs for sustainable materials and technologies, regulation, sourcing sustainable materials, performance, staff competencies, energy efficiency, waste management, environmental quality and impact, community perception and awareness, integration with existing infrastructure, and others. In order to address these problems, it is essential to adopt appropriate methods and techniques that facilitate informed decision-making and the creation of sustainable strategies for developing building practices. One of the methods for analyzing and developing sustainable building practices is multi-criteria assessment methods that allow for the consideration of multiple criteria simultaneously, providing a more holistic view of the alternatives being assessed. These methods enhance the transparency of the decision-making process by clearly defining the criteria and weights used in the evaluation, and they can be adapted to various building practices. In this study, the COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) method was chosen which is a multi-criteria decision-making method that provides a systematic and quantitative approach for evaluating and ranking alternatives based on multiple criteria and ensures a more objective and data-driven decision-making process. This study aims to analyze the development peculiarities of sustainable building practices in the European region by applying the COPRAS approach and method. In this study, a scientific literature review, the COPRAS method, and expert evaluation were applied. The results of the expert evaluation showed that confidence in the quality and structural properties of secondary materials (traceability) criteria received the highest weight among other criteria. Applying the comprehensive COPRAS method highlighted that assessing the set of criteria is vital for the construction and manufacturing sectors. These findings could be significant for policymakers in developing sustainable building practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Eva Trinkuniene & Aurelija Burinskiene & Raimonda Bubliene, 2025. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach COPRAS for Developing Sustainable Building Practices in the European Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3740-:d:1638995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3740/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3740/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3740-:d:1638995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.