IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5763-d812594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Earthquake Vulnerability Reduction by Building a Robust Social-Emotional Preparedness Program

Author

Listed:
  • Shira Daskal

    (The Natural Resources and Environmental Research Center (NRERC), University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Adar Ben-Eliyahu

    (Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Gal Levy

    (Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Yakov Ben-Haim

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

  • Ronnen Avny

    (Institute for the Development of Enterprises, Corvinus University of Budapest, 1093 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Despite the progress made in understanding the characteristics of earthquakes, the predictions of earthquake activity are still inevitably very uncertain, mainly because of the highly complex nature of the earthquake process. The population′s mental strength is of high importance not only to cope with an earthquake, but also to return quickly to functioning. Social-emotional preparedness for extreme adverse events and crises is a critical factor in the population’s quick recovery and return to full functioning. In the present study, we apply a multi-disciplinary lens to extend the scope of earthquake preparedness to include social-emotional programs. The goal of this study is to develop a robust “no-regret” social-emotional preparedness program (SEPP) along with methodological tools for evaluating the SEPP robustness against uncertainty in different earthquake scenarios. The research methodology is twofold. First, we develop the SEPP based on social-emotional proxies-for-robustness, and second, we apply the info-gap decision theory (IGDT) methods to assess the robustness of the SEPP in the face of uncertainty in different earthquake scenarios. The findings indicate gaps between the level of robustness of the SEPP in different scenarios. A key conclusion that emerges from this study is the need for a robust SEPP to make a significant contribution to the population’s ability to return to functioning. Such SEPP should be formulated to maximize the robustness against uncertainty in different scenarios, rather than the traditional planning based on a ‘one size fits all’ approach. Formulating a robust SEPP by analyzing the robustness of the SEPP against uncertainty will enable to make decisions immune to surprises. Ways to create or improve earthquake preparedness are suggested for policy and in-school application.

Suggested Citation

  • Shira Daskal & Adar Ben-Eliyahu & Gal Levy & Yakov Ben-Haim & Ronnen Avny, 2022. "Earthquake Vulnerability Reduction by Building a Robust Social-Emotional Preparedness Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5763-:d:812594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5763/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5763/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adar Ben-Eliyahu, 2021. "Sustainable Learning in Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Linet Özdamar & Ediz Ekinci & Beste Küçükyazici, 2004. "Emergency Logistics Planning in Natural Disasters," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 217-245, July.
    3. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2016. "A review of definitions and measures of system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 47-61.
    4. Ben-Haim, Yakov & Osteen, Craig D. & Moffitt, L. Joe, 2013. "Policy dilemma of innovation: An info-gap approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 130-138.
    5. Sergiu Hart & Andreu Mas-Colell, 2013. "A Simple Adaptive Procedure Leading To Correlated Equilibrium," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Simple Adaptive Strategies From Regret-Matching to Uncoupled Dynamics, chapter 2, pages 17-46, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Lehrer, Ehud, 2003. "A wide range no-regret theorem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 101-115, January.
    7. Coles, John B. & Zhuang, Jun & Yates, Justin, 2012. "Case study in disaster relief: A descriptive analysis of agency partnerships in the aftermath of the January 12th, 2010 Haitian earthquake," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 67-77.
    8. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2007. "An emergency logistics distribution approach for quick response to urgent relief demand in disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 687-709, November.
    9. Kulatilaka, Nalin & Marks, Stephen Gary, 1988. "The Strategic Value of Flexibility: Reducing the Ability to Compromise," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(3), pages 574-580, June.
    10. Ben-Haim, Yakov & Demertzis, Maria, 2016. "Decision making in times of Knightian uncertainty: An info-gap perspective," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 10, pages 1-30.
    11. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    12. Hasani, Aliakbar & Mokhtari, Hadi, 2018. "Redesign strategies of a comprehensive robust relief network for disaster management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 92-102.
    13. Lin, Yen-Hung & Batta, Rajan & Rogerson, Peter A. & Blatt, Alan & Flanigan, Marie, 2012. "Location of temporary depots to facilitate relief operations after an earthquake," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 112-123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    2. Yisha Xiang & Jun Zhuang, 2016. "A medical resource allocation model for serving emergency victims with deteriorating health conditions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(1), pages 177-196, January.
    3. Hasti Seraji & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Sobhan Asian & Harpreet Kaur, 2022. "An integrative location-allocation model for humanitarian logistics with distributive injustice and dissatisfaction under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 211-257, December.
    4. Yanbin Chang & Yongjia Song & Burak Eksioglu, 2022. "A stochastic look-ahead approach for hurricane relief logistics operations planning under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1231-1263, December.
    5. Renata Turkeš & Daniel Palhazi Cuervo & Kenneth Sörensen, 2019. "Pre-positioning of emergency supplies: does putting a price on human life help to save lives?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 865-895, December.
    6. Shuanglin Li & Kok Lay Teo, 2019. "Post-disaster multi-period road network repair: work scheduling and relief logistics optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1345-1385, December.
    7. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Ying, Kuo-Ching & Chen, Hui-Ju, 2016. "Real-time relief distribution in the aftermath of disasters – A rolling horizon approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-20.
    8. Zobel, Christopher W. & Baghersad, Milad, 2020. "Analytically comparing disaster resilience across multiple dimensions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Karl Schlag & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2009. "Decision Making in Uncertain and Changing Environments," Discussion Papers 19, Kyiv School of Economics.
    10. Alem, Douglas & Clark, Alistair & Moreno, Alfredo, 2016. "Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 187-206.
    11. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency Relief Routing Models for Injured Victims Considering Equity and Priority," Post-Print hal-02879681, HAL.
    12. Jeong, Ho Young & Yu, David J. & Min, Byung-Cheol & Lee, Seokcheon, 2020. "The humanitarian flying warehouse," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Mannor, Shie & Shimkin, Nahum, 2008. "Regret minimization in repeated matrix games with variable stage duration," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 227-258, May.
    14. Schlag, Karl H. & Zapechelnyuk, Andriy, 2017. "Dynamic benchmark targeting," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 145-169.
    15. Liu, Bingsheng & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Zhao, Xue & Chen, Yuan & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "Decision making on post-disaster rescue routing problems from the rescue efficiency perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 321-335.
    16. Afshin Kamyabniya & M. M. Lotfi & Mohsen Naderpour & Yuehwern Yih, 2018. "Robust Platelet Logistics Planning in Disaster Relief Operations Under Uncertainty: a Coordinated Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 759-782, August.
    17. Arifovic, Jasmina & Boitnott, Joshua F. & Duffy, John, 2019. "Learning correlated equilibria: An evolutionary approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 171-190.
    18. Paveena Chaovalitwongse & Krongsin Somprasonk & Naragain Phumchusri & Joseph Heim & Zelda B. Zabinsky & W. Art Chaovalitwongse, 2017. "A decision support model for staff allocation of mobile medical service," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 433-448, February.
    19. Ehud Lehrer & Eilon Solan, 2003. "No-Regret with Bounded Computational Capacity," Discussion Papers 1373, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    20. Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2009. "Limit Behavior of No-regret Dynamics," Discussion Papers 21, Kyiv School of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5763-:d:812594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.