IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12240-d673173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary Game Analysis on Last Mile Delivery Resource Integration—Exploring the Behavioral Strategies between Logistics Service Providers, Property Service Companies and Customers

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Zhou

    (School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

  • Yanping Chen

    (School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

  • Yi Jing

    (School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

  • Youwei Jiang

    (School of foreign languages, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)

Abstract

As resource integration plays a significant part in improving operational efficiency in the last mile delivery industry, there is an increasing popularity for logistics service providers (LSPs) to collaborate with property service companies (PSCs). Based on the evolutionary game theory, considering the dual role of PSCs when collaborating with LSPs, a trilateral evolutionary game model between PSCs, LSPs, and customers (Cs) is established to analyze the strategic choices and explore the influencing factors on the tripartite strategy. The results show that (1) There are optimal profit allocation coefficients and cost-sharing coefficients to cause the system to reach a steady state. (2) The integration cost between LSPs and PSCs and the home delivery cost inhibit the strategic integration of the two enterprises. (3) PSCs are more sensitive to their benefits and costs than LSPs in the process of resource integration. (4) More precisely evaluating their potential loss caused by temporary integration will help the tripartite to make a more scientific choice of strategic behavior. (5) The increase of community premium income helps to improve the enthusiasm of Cs supporting strategic integration. (6) The behavior and decision-making choices of the three game players affect each other in the last mile delivery resource integration. (7) The indirect benefits, such as advertising during their integration, play a positive role. Finally, the MATLAB2020a software is applied to simulate and analyze the impact of key factors on strategy evolution, and we propose several useful suggestions to promote the development of last mile delivery resource integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Zhou & Yanping Chen & Yi Jing & Youwei Jiang, 2021. "Evolutionary Game Analysis on Last Mile Delivery Resource Integration—Exploring the Behavioral Strategies between Logistics Service Providers, Property Service Companies and Customers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12240-:d:673173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12240/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12240/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Photis M Panayides & Meko So, 2005. "The Impact of Integrated Logistics Relationships on Third-Party Logistics Service Quality and Performance," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 7(1), pages 36-55, March.
    2. Cruijssen, Frans & Cools, Martine & Dullaert, Wout, 2007. "Horizontal cooperation in logistics: Opportunities and impediments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 129-142, March.
    3. Zhou, Lin & Baldacci, Roberto & Vigo, Daniele & Wang, Xu, 2018. "A Multi-Depot Two-Echelon Vehicle Routing Problem with Delivery Options Arising in the Last Mile Distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 765-778.
    4. Cruijssen, F. & Braysy, O. & Dullaert, W. & Fleuren, H.A. & Salomon, M., 2006. "Joint Route Planning under Varying Market Conditions," Other publications TiSEM 3de2ec0a-7424-43ec-a419-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Xuping Wang & Linmin Zhan & Junhu Ruan & Jun Zhang, 2014. "How to Choose “Last Mile” Delivery Modes for E-Fulfillment," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-11, June.
    6. Devari, Aashwinikumar & Nikolaev, Alexander G. & He, Qing, 2017. "Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-122.
    7. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2021. "Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Chao Chen & Shenle Pan & Zhu Wang & Ray Y. Zhong, 2017. "Using taxis to collect citywide E-commerce reverse flows: a crowdsourcing solution," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1833-1844, April.
    9. Fan, Tijun & Pan, Qianlan & Pan, Fei & Zhou, Wei & Chen, Jingyi, 2020. "Intelligent logistics integration of internal and external transportation with separation mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Prajogo, Daniel & Olhager, Jan, 2012. "Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 514-522.
    11. Chao Chen & Shenle Pan & Zhu Wang & Ray Y. Zhong, 2017. "Using taxis to collect citywide E-commerce reverse flows: a crowdsourcing solution," Post-Print hal-01300487, HAL.
    12. Sung Tae Kim & Hong-Hee Lee & Taewon Hwang, 2020. "Logistics integration in the supply chain: a resource dependence theory perspective," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Michael Lewis & Vishal Singh & Scott Fay, 2006. "An Empirical Study of the Impact of Nonlinear Shipping and Handling Fees on Purchase Incidence and Expenditure Decisions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 51-64, 01-02.
    14. Archetti, Claudia & Savelsbergh, Martin & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2016. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Occasional Drivers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 472-480.
    15. Kafle, Nabin & Zou, Bo & Lin, Jane, 2017. "Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 62-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziyu Chen & Jili Kong, 2023. "Research on Shared Logistics Decision Based on Evolutionary Game and Income Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bathke, Henrik & Hartmann, Evi, 2021. "Accepting a crowdsourced delivery - A choice-based conjoint analysis," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 65-95, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    2. Nieto-Isaza, Santiago & Fontaine, Pirmin & Minner, Stefan, 2022. "The value of stochastic crowd resources and strategic location of mini-depots for last-mile delivery: A Benders decomposition approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 62-79.
    3. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2021. "Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. dos Santos, André Gustavo & Viana, Ana & Pedroso, João Pedro, 2022. "2-echelon lastmile delivery with lockers and occasional couriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Yıldız, Barış, 2021. "Package routing problem with registered couriers and stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2019. "An exact solution method for the capacitated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 589-604.
    8. Marlin Ulmer & Martin Savelsbergh, 2020. "Workforce Scheduling in the Era of Crowdsourced Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 1113-1133, July.
    9. Kexin Bi & Mengke Yang & Latif Zahid & Xiaoguang Zhou, 2020. "A New Solution for City Distribution to Achieve Environmental Benefits within the Trend of Green Logistics: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Pasirayi, Simbarashe & Fennell, Patrick B. & Sen, Argha, 2023. "The effect of third-party delivery partnerships on firm value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Yu, Vincent F. & Jodiawan, Panca & Redi, A.A.N. Perwira, 2022. "Crowd-shipping problem with time windows, transshipment nodes, and delivery options," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Cleophas, Catherine & Cottrill, Caitlin & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Tierney, Kevin, 2019. "Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 801-816.
    13. Yu, Vincent F. & Jodiawan, Panca & Hou, Ming-Lu & Gunawan, Aldy, 2021. "Design of a two-echelon freight distribution system in last-mile logistics considering covering locations and occasional drivers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Zehtabian, Shohre & Larsen, Christian & Wøhlk, Sanne, 2022. "Estimation of the arrival time of deliveries by occasional drivers in a crowd-shipping setting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 616-632.
    15. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank, 2018. "The integration of item-sharing and crowdshipping: Can collaborative consumption be pushed by delivering through the crowd?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 227-243.
    16. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Schwerdfeger, Stefan, 2022. "Crowdshipping by employees of distribution centers: Optimization approaches for matching supply and demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 539-556.
    17. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    18. Wang, Li & Xu, Min & Qin, Hu, 2023. "Joint optimization of parcel allocation and crowd routing for crowdsourced last-mile delivery," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 111-135.
    19. Alireza Ermagun & Ali Shamshiripour & Amanda Stathopoulos, 2020. "Performance analysis of crowd-shipping in urban and suburban areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1955-1985, August.
    20. Xiao Lin & Yoshinari Nishiki & Lóránt A. Tavasszy, 2020. "Performance and Intrusiveness of Crowdshipping Systems: An Experiment with Commuting Cyclists in The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12240-:d:673173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.