IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9103-d614332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accessibility of Services in Rural Areas: Southern Moravia Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Antonín Vaishar

    (Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Milada Šťastná

    (Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The accessibility of basic services in rural settlements in the South Moravian Region was evaluated; the accessibility by public transport was taken into account because the accessibility by individual car transport does not manifest any problems. The accessibility was calculated for 768 rural settlements, defined as spatially separate places which do not belong to municipalities with extended power. The time distance includes the time of the ride plus 8 min walking distance to and from the stop. The data was taken from the Integrated Transport System of the South Moravian Region, which ensures that each populated place in the region has to be connected by public transport at least six times on working days. The results show that for 99.8% of the inhabitants of the region, central places equipped with a post office, a basic school and a general practitioner’s office are accessible in a shorter time than 30 min. The accessibility of the services depends primarily on the characteristics of the settlement system and the physical conditions of the transport. In lowland areas, the share of settlements with comfortable accessibility is expressively higher than that of the highland and peripheral territories. The possible future improvement consists of the digitization of the services.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonín Vaishar & Milada Šťastná, 2021. "Accessibility of Services in Rural Areas: Southern Moravia Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9103-:d:614332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis A. Guzman & Daniel Oviedo & Rafael Cardona, 2018. "Accessibility Changes: Analysis of the Integrated Public Transport System of Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Kerkman, Kasper & Martens, Karel & Meurs, Henk, 2017. "A multilevel spatial interaction model of transit flows incorporating spatial and network autocorrelation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 155-166.
    3. Athanasios K. Vionis & Giorgos Papantoniou, 2019. "Central Place Theory Reloaded and Revised: Political Economy and Landscape Dynamics in the Longue Durée," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Veronika Zavratnik & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2018. "Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Gianpaolo Basile & Aurora Cavallo, 2020. "Rural Identity, Authenticity, and Sustainability in Italian Inner Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Rosik, Piotr & Pomianowski, Wojciech & Komornicki, Tomasz & Goliszek, Sławomir & Szejgiec-Kolenda, Barbara & Duma, Patryk, 2020. "Regional dispersion of potential accessibility quotient at the intra-European and intranational level. Core-periphery pattern, discontinuity belts and distance decay tornado effect," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Luis Camarero & Jesús Oliva, 2019. "Thinking in rural gap: mobility and social inequalities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Bianca Mitrică & Paul Şerban & Irena Mocanu & Ines Grigorescu & Nicoleta Damian & Monica Dumitraşcu, 2020. "Social Development and Regional Disparities in the Rural Areas of Romania: Focus on the Social Disadvantaged Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 67-89, November.
    9. Antonín Vaishar & Milada Šťastná & Kateřina Stonawská, 2015. "Small Towns - Engines of Rural Development in the South-Moravian Region (Czechia): An Analysis of the Demographic Development," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(4), pages 1395-1405.
    10. Mangirdas Morkunas & Povilas Labukas, 2020. "The Evaluation of Negative Factors of Direct Payments under Common Agricultural Policy from a Viewpoint of Sustainability of Rural Regions of the New EU Member States: Evidence from Lithuania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Silvia Coderoni & Francesco Pagliacci, 2018. "The territorial dimension of environmental sustainability in Italy along the urban–rural continuum," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(8), pages 1318-1339, July.
    12. Alessandro Vasta & Elisabete Figueiredo & Sandra Valente & Hilkka Vihinen & Marta Nieto-Romero, 2019. "Place-Based Policies for Sustainability and Rural Development: The Case of a Portuguese Village “Spun” in Traditional Linen," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Joseph, Alun E. & Bantock, Peter R., 1982. "Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: A method and case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 85-90, January.
    14. Sörensen, Leif & Bossert, Andreas & Jokinen, Jani-Pekka & Schlüter, Jan, 2021. "How much flexibility does rural public transport need? – Implications from a fully flexible DRT system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 5-20.
    15. Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone & Giancarlo Cotella, 2020. "Improving Rural Accessibility: A Multilayer Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    16. João Lourenço Marques & Jan Wolf & Fillipe Feitosa, 2021. "Accessibility to primary schools in Portugal: a case of spatial inequity?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 693-707, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianyu Li & Yizheng Zhao & Xiang Kong, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Basic Public Service Levels in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Juan Miguel Vega Naranjo & Montaña Jiménez-Espada & Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Rafael González-Escobar & Juan Pedro Cortés-Pérez, 2023. "Intercity Mobility Assessment Facing the Demographic Challenge: A Survey-Based Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Šťastná Milada & Vaishar Antonín, 2023. "Opportunities for the Development of a Borderland Rural Territory: A Case Study of the Hlučín Region," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 42(4), pages 91-106, December.
    4. David Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Remedios Larrubia Vargas, 2022. "Protected Areas and Rural Depopulation in Spain: A Multi-Stakeholder Perceptual Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Chang-Gyun Roh & Jiyoon Kim, 2022. "What Are More Efficient Transportation Services in a Rural Area? A Case Study in Yangsan City, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Ivana Nikolić & Jelena Milutinović & Darko Božanić & Momčilo Dobrodolac, 2023. "Using an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AROMAN Decision-Making Method to Improve the Sustainability of the Postal Network in Rural Areas," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elzbieta Szymanska & Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska, 2022. "Sustainable Innovative Mobility Solutions Preferred by Inhabitants of Rural Areas—The Case of Lithuania and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Aurore Flipo & Madeleine Sallustio & Nathalie Ortar & Nicolas Senil, 2021. "Sustainable Mobility and the Institutional Lock-In: The Example of Rural France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Ruggiero Sardaro & Piermichele La Sala, 2022. "Recovery and Resilience of the Inner Areas: Identifying Collective Policy Actions through PROMETHEE II," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Flipo, Aurore & Ortar, Nathalie & Sallustio, Madeleine, 2023. "Can the transition to sustainable mobility be fair in rural areas? A stakeholder approach to mobility justice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 136-143.
    5. Jin, Tanhua & Cheng, Long & Wang, Kailai & Cao, Jun & Huang, Haosheng & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Examining equity in accessibility to multi-tier healthcare services across different income households using estimated travel time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Irune Ruiz-Martínez & Javier Esparcia, 2020. "Internet Access in Rural Areas: Brake or Stimulus as Post-Covid-19 Opportunity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Friedrich Schneider & Mangirdas Morkunas & Erika Quendler, 2021. "Measuring the Immeasurable: The Evolution of the Size of Informal Economy in the Agricultural Sector in the EU-15 up to 2019," CESifo Working Paper Series 8937, CESifo.
    8. Olsen, Jonathan R. & Thornton, Lukar & Tregonning, Grant & Mitchell, Richard, 2022. "Nationwide equity assessment of the 20-min neighbourhood in the scottish context: A socio-spatial proximity analysis of residential locations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    9. Pei, Shunshun & Zhai, Changhai & Hu, Jie, 2024. "Surrogate model-assisted seismic resilience assessment of the interdependent transportation and healthcare system considering a two-stage recovery strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    10. Daniel Oviedo & Lynn Scholl & Marco Innao & Lauramaria Pedraza, 2019. "Do Bus Rapid Transit Systems Improve Accessibility to Job Opportunities for the Poor? The Case of Lima, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Mohíno, Inmaculada & Ureña, José M. & Solís, Eloy, 2016. "Transport infrastructure and territorial cohesion in rural metro-adjacent regions: A multimodal accessibility approach. The case of Castilla-La Mancha in the context of Madrid (Spain)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 115-133.
    12. Olof Åslund & John Östh & Yves Zenou, 2010. "How important is access to jobs? Old question--improved answer," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 389-422, May.
    13. Duggal, Angel Swastik & Singh, Rajesh & Gehlot, Anita & Gupta, Lovi Raj & Akram, Sheik Vaseem & Prakash, Chander & Singh, Sunpreet & Kumar, Raman, 2021. "Infrastructure, mobility and safety 4.0: Modernization in road transportation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Muhammad Yusuf, 2023. "Village Open Data Implementation: Lesson Learned from Alang-alang Vilalge, Madura," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 16(1), pages 11-17.
    15. Daniel Oviedo & Luis A. Guzman, 2020. "Revisiting Accessibility in a Context of Sustainable Transport: Capabilities and Inequalities in Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Vanessa Zorrilla-Muñoz & María Silveria Agulló-Tomás & Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez & Alba Ayala & Gloria Fernandez-Mayoralas & Maria João Forjaz, 2022. "Ageing Perception as a Key Predictor of Self-Rated Health by Rural Older People—A Study with Gender and Inclusive Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Piotr Rosik & Julia Wójcik, 2022. "Transport Infrastructure and Regional Development: A Survey of Literature on Wider Economic and Spatial Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Kanuganti, Shalini & Sarkar, Ashoke Kumar & Singh, Ajit Pratap, 2016. "Evaluation of access to health care in rural areas using enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 45-52.
    19. Akpan, Uduak & Morimoto, Risako, 2022. "An application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to the prioritization of rural roads to improve rural accessibility in Nigeria," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    20. Sylwia Barwicka & Małgorzata Milecka, 2022. "The “Perfect Village” Model as a Result of Research on Transformation of Plant Cover—Case Study of the Puchaczów Commune," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9103-:d:614332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.