IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2189-d501362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Mobility and the Institutional Lock-In: The Example of Rural France

Author

Listed:
  • Aurore Flipo

    (Ecole Nationale des Travaux Publics de l’Etat, LAET (Transport, Urban Planning, Economics Laboratory), University of Lyon, F-69518 Vaulx-en-Velin CEDEX, France)

  • Madeleine Sallustio

    (Pacte/Institut d’Etudes Politiques, Grenoble Alpes University, F-38040 Grenoble CEDEX, France)

  • Nathalie Ortar

    (Ecole Nationale des Travaux Publics de l’Etat, LAET (Transport, Urban Planning, Economics Laboratory), University of Lyon, F-69518 Vaulx-en-Velin CEDEX, France)

  • Nicolas Senil

    (Pacte/Institut d’Etudes Politiques, Grenoble Alpes University, F-38040 Grenoble CEDEX, France)

Abstract

Sustainable mobility issues in rural areas, compared with urban mobility issues, have so far been poorly covered in the French and European public debate. However, local mobility issues are determining factors in territorial inequalities, regional development and ecological transition. This paper is based on preliminary findings of qualitative socio-anthropological fieldwork carried out in two rural departments of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region: Drôme and Ardèche. Our objective is to highlight how the question of sustainable local mobility is linked to governance issues and multiple overlapping institutions. We argue that analyzing stakeholders’ strategies and territorial governance is key to understanding the contemporary dynamics surrounding a transition towards a more sustainable mobility in rural areas. In order to do so, we show how the debates surrounding the adoption of a law allowing for the transfer of responsibility to local authorities for the organization of mobility services reveals the complexity of local mobility governance in rural areas and provides material for the analysis of the logics of stakeholder engagement, cooperation and conflict within the field of sustainable mobility. Through the case study of the organization of a local public transport service in a rural area, we shed light on the action of multiple stakeholders and their potentially antagonistic objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurore Flipo & Madeleine Sallustio & Nathalie Ortar & Nicolas Senil, 2021. "Sustainable Mobility and the Institutional Lock-In: The Example of Rural France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2189-:d:501362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2189/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2189/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathalie Bertrand & Patrick Moquay, 2004. "La gouvernance locale, un retour à la proximité," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 280(1), pages 77-95.
    2. Goldthau, Andreas & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2012. "The uniqueness of the energy security, justice, and governance problem," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 232-240.
    3. Gary Bosworth & Liz Price & Martin Collison & Charles Fox, 2020. "Unequal futures of rural mobility: Challenges for a “Smart Countrysideâ€," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(6), pages 586-608, September.
    4. Luis Camarero & Jesús Oliva, 2019. "Thinking in rural gap: mobility and social inequalities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Shirgaokar, Manish & Dobbs, Bonnie & Anderson, Leah & Hussey, Emily, 2020. "Do rural older adults take fewer trips than their urban counterparts for lack of a ride?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Christelle Paulo, 2007. "Une mesure des inégalités de mobilité et d'accès au volant," Post-Print halshs-01680328, HAL.
    7. Nathalie Ortar & Marianne Ryghaug, 2019. "Should All Cars Be Electric by 2025? The Electric Car Debate in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, March.
    8. David Schlosberg & David Carruthers, 2010. "Indigenous Struggles, Environmental Justice, and Community Capabilities," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(4), pages 12-35, November.
    9. Hélène Rey-Valette & Syndhia Mathé, 2012. "L'évaluation de la gouvernance territoriale. Enjeux et propositions méthodologiques," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(5), pages 783-804.
    10. Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone & Giancarlo Cotella, 2020. "Improving Rural Accessibility: A Multilayer Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Pasaoglu, Guzay & Zubaryeva, Alyona & Fiorello, Davide & Thiel, Christian, 2014. "Analysis of European mobility surveys and their potential to support studies on the impact of electric vehicles on energy and infrastructure needs in Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 41-50.
    12. Benjamin K. Sovacool & Mari Martiskainen & Andrew Hook & Lucy Baker, 2019. "Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 581-619, August.
    13. John Pucher & John Renne, 2005. "Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 165-186, March.
    14. Ortar, Nathalie, 2018. "Dealing with energy crises: Working and living arrangements in peri-urban France," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 72-78.
    15. Schwanen, Tim & Lucas, Karen & Akyelken, Nihan & Cisternas Solsona, Diego & Carrasco, Juan-Antonio & Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 123-135.
    16. Yann Algan & Clément Malgouyres & Claudia Senik, 2019. "Territoires, bien-être et politiques publiques," Post-Print halshs-02489740, HAL.
    17. Dallas J. Elgin & Christopher M. Weible, 2013. "A Stakeholder Analysis of C olorado Climate and Energy Issues Using Policy Analytical Capacity and the Advocacy Coalition Framework," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 30(1), pages 114-133, January.
    18. Weinberg, Alvin M., 1985. "`Immortal' energy systems and intergenerational justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 51-59, February.
    19. María del Carmen Pérez-Peña & Mercedes Jiménez-García & José Ruiz-Chico & Antonio Rafael Peña-Sánchez, 2021. "Transport Poverty with Special Reference to Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Belton Chevallier, Leslie & Motte-Baumvol, Benjamin & Fol, Sylvie & Jouffe, Yves, 2018. "Coping with the costs of car dependency: A system of expedients used by low-income households on the outskirts of Dijon and Paris," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 79-88.
    21. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    22. Mounce, Richard & Beecroft, Mark & Nelson, John D., 2020. "On the role of frameworks and smart mobility in addressing the rural mobility problem," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Flipo, Aurore & Ortar, Nathalie & Sallustio, Madeleine, 2023. "Can the transition to sustainable mobility be fair in rural areas? A stakeholder approach to mobility justice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 136-143.
    2. Marc Schabka & Aurelia Kammerhofer & Valerie Batiajew & Maria Juschten, 2022. "Driving Forces and Barriers for the Implementation of Mobility Services in Austria—A Practitioner Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flipo, Aurore & Ortar, Nathalie & Sallustio, Madeleine, 2023. "Can the transition to sustainable mobility be fair in rural areas? A stakeholder approach to mobility justice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 136-143.
    2. Mattioli, Giulio & Wadud, Zia & Lucas, Karen, 2018. "Vulnerability to fuel price increases in the UK: A household level analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 227-242.
    3. Romanika Okraszewska & Kazimierz Jamroz & Lech Michalski & Joanna Żukowska & Krzysztof Grzelec & Krystian Birr, 2019. "Analysing Ways to Achieve a New Urban Agenda-Based Sustainable Metropolitan Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Antonín Vaishar & Milada Šťastná, 2021. "Accessibility of Services in Rural Areas: Southern Moravia Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Knierim, Lukas & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2021. "The attitude of potentially less mobile people towards demand responsive transport in a rural area in central Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Elzbieta Szymanska & Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska, 2022. "Sustainable Innovative Mobility Solutions Preferred by Inhabitants of Rural Areas—The Case of Lithuania and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Cohen-Blankshtain, Galit, 2021. "On another track: Differing views of experts and politicians on rail investments in peripheral localities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Morton, Craig & Anable, Jillian & Yeboah, Godwin & Cottrill, Caitlin, 2018. "The spatial pattern of demand in the early market for electric vehicles: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 119-130.
    9. Castán Broto, Vanesa & Baptista, Idalina & Kirshner, Joshua & Smith, Shaun & Neves Alves, Susana, 2018. "Energy justice and sustainability transitions in Mozambique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 645-655.
    10. van Dülmen, Christoph & Šimon, Martin & Klärner, Andreas, 2022. "Transport poverty meets car dependency: A GPS tracking study of socially disadvantaged groups in European rural peripheries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Chunfang Liu & Bin Yu & Yue Zhu & Licheng Liu & Pengjie Li, 2019. "Measurement of Rural Residents’ Mobility in Western China: A Case Study of Qingyang, Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Sakari Höysniemi & Arto O. Salonen, 2019. "Towards Carbon-Neutral Mobility in Finland: Mobility and Life Satisfaction in Day-to-Day Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    13. De Witte, Astrid & Hollevoet, Joachim & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Hubert, Michel & Macharis, Cathy, 2013. "Linking modal choice to motility: A comprehensive review," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 329-341.
    14. Douglas Mitieka & Rose Luke & Hossana Twinomurinzi & Joash Mageto, 2023. "Smart Mobility in Urban Areas: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Eva-Luz Tejada-Gutiérrez & Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska & Mariantonietta Fiore & Alessia Spada, 2023. "Sustainable Environmental Development from the Regional Perspective—The Interesting Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Benjamin K. Sovacool & Mari Martiskainen & Andrew Hook & Lucy Baker, 2019. "Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 581-619, August.
    17. Schasché, Stephanie E. & Sposato, Robert G. & Hampl, Nina, 2022. "The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 43-54.
    18. Rozynek, Caroline & Schwerdtfeger, Stefanie & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2022. "The influence of limited financial resources on daily travel practices. A case study of low-income households with children in the Hanover Region (Germany)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Mattioli, Giulio & Philips, Ian & Anable, Jillian & Chatterton, Tim, 2019. "Vulnerability to motor fuel price increases: Socio-spatial patterns in England," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 98-114.
    20. Nathalie Ortar & Marianne Ryghaug, 2019. "Should All Cars Be Electric by 2025? The Electric Car Debate in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2189-:d:501362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.