IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p8035-d596810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management in Seaports: A Community Analysis at the Port of Hamburg

Author

Listed:
  • Ayman Nagi

    (Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Meike Schroeder

    (Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Wolfgang Kersten

    (Institute of Business Logistics and General Management, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), 21073 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

The aim of this work is to detect communities of stakeholders at the port of Hamburg regarding their communication intensity in activities related to risk management. An exploratory mixed-method design is chosen as a methodology based on a compact survey and semi-structured interviews, as well as secondary data. A compact survey at the port of Hamburg is utilized to address the communication intensity values among stakeholders. Based on 28 full responses, the data is extracted, cleansed, and prepared for the network analysis using the software “Gephi”. Thereafter, the Louvain community detection algorithm is used to extract the communities from the network. A plausibility check is carried out using 15 semi-structured interviews and secondary data to verify and refine the results of the community analysis. The results have revealed different communities for the following risk categories: (a) natural disasters and (b) operational and safety risks. The focus of cooperation is on the reactive process and emergency plans. For instance, emergency plans play an important role in the handling of natural disasters such as floods or extreme winds.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayman Nagi & Meike Schroeder & Wolfgang Kersten, 2021. "Risk Management in Seaports: A Community Analysis at the Port of Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8035-:d:596810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8035/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8035/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayman Nagi & Marius Indorf & Carolin Singer-Neumann & Lauri Ojala, 2019. "Current State of Risk Assessment in Seaports: An Empirical Study," Springer Books, in: Meike Schröder & Kirsten Wegner (ed.), Logistik im Wandel der Zeit – Von der Produktionssteuerung zu vernetzten Supply Chains, pages 79-101, Springer.
    2. Jochen Schmidt & Iain Matcham & Stefan Reese & Andrew King & Rob Bell & Roddy Henderson & Graeme Smart & Jim Cousins & Warwick Smith & Dave Heron, 2011. "Quantitative multi-risk analysis for natural hazards: a framework for multi-risk modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 58(3), pages 1169-1192, September.
    3. ., 2019. "Public policy in a blockchain era," Chapters, in: Understanding the Blockchain Economy, chapter 8, pages 138-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Amir Hossein Gharehgozli & Debjit Roy & René de Koster, 2016. "Sea container terminals: New technologies and OR models," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(2), pages 103-140, June.
    5. ., 2019. "Market development and public-private partnerships," Chapters, in: The Logic of Public–Private Partnerships, chapter 5, pages 137-160, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Salvatore F. Pileggi & Marius Indorf & Ayman Nagi & Wolfgang Kersten, 2020. "CoRiMaS—An Ontological Approach to Cooperative Risk Management in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Zhang, Yi & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2016. "Estimating economic losses of industry clusters due to port disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 17-33.
    8. Maria Rosa Pires da Cruz & João J Ferreira & Susana Garrido Azevedo, 2013. "Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(4), pages 416-443, December.
    9. Jai‐Young Choi & Eden S.H. Yu, 2019. "A public‐good approach to environmental economy," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 15(3), pages 269-280, September.
    10. Lee, Charles M.C. & Qu, Yuanyu & Shen, Tao, 2019. "Going public in China: Reverse mergers versus IPOs," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 92-111.
    11. De, Arijit & Choudhary, Alok & Turkay, Metin & Tiwari, Manoj K., 2021. "Bunkering policies for a fuel bunker management problem for liner shipping networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 927-939.
    12. Arijit De & Saurabh Pratap & Akhilesh Kumar & M. K. Tiwari, 2020. "A hybrid dynamic berth allocation planning problem with fuel costs considerations for container terminal port using chemical reaction optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 783-811, July.
    13. Nea, 2019. "Recent publications," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2018(2).
    14. Fenghua Wang & Ying Fan & An Zeng & Zengru Di, 2019. "Can we predict ESI highly cited publications?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 109-125, January.
    15. ., 2019. "The economic art of public-private partnerships," Chapters, in: The Logic of Public–Private Partnerships, chapter 4, pages 85-136, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Terje Aven & Ortwin Renn, 2010. "Risk Management and Governance," Risk, Governance and Society, Springer, number 978-3-642-13926-0, March.
    17. Michael Dooms & Cathy Macharis & Alain Verbeke, 2004. "Proactive stakeholder management in the port planning process: empirical evidence from the Port of Brussels," ERSA conference papers ersa04p271, European Regional Science Association.
    18. ., 2019. "Public procurement case," Chapters, in: Convenience Triangle in White-Collar Crime, chapter 18, pages 209-217, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. John Morgan & Justin Tumlinson, 2019. "Corporate Provision of Public Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4489-4504, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayman Nagi & Wolfgang Kersten, 2022. "A Process Model for Cooperative Risk Management in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia, Shuai & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2020. "A simulation optimization method for deep-sea vessel berth planning and feeder arrival scheduling at a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 174-196.
    2. Xiaofang Wu & Hsi-Chi Yang, 2021. "An Ecological Sustainability Assessment Approach for Strategic Decision Making in International Shipping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Amal Benkarim & Daniel Imbeau, 2021. "Organizational Commitment and Lean Sustainability: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Sisira S. Withanachchi & Ilia Kunchulia & Giorgi Ghambashidze & Rami Al Sidawi & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2018. "Farmers’ Perception of Water Quality and Risks in the Mashavera River Basin, Georgia: Analyzing the Vulnerability of the Social-Ecological System through Community Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Liu, Baoli & Li, Zhi-Chun & Sheng, Dian & Wang, Yadong, 2021. "Integrated planning of berth allocation and vessel sequencing in a seaport with one-way navigation channel," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 23-47.
    6. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    7. Tamara Krajna & Jelka Petrak, 2019. "Croatian Highly Cited Papers," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 17(3-B), pages 684-696.
    8. Sven Ove Hansson & Terje Aven, 2014. "Is Risk Analysis Scientific?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(7), pages 1173-1183, July.
    9. Andreas Lange & Claudia Schwirplies, 2021. "Bargaining With Charitable Promises: True Preferences and Strategic Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 9129, CESifo.
    10. Yang, Ya Ling, 2020. "Comparison of public perception and risk management decisions of aircraft noise near Taoyuan and Kaohsiung International Airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Petri Helo & Henri Paukku & Tero Sairanen, 2021. "Containership cargo profiles, cargo systems, and stowage capacity: key performance indicators," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 28-48, March.
    12. Bjerga, Torbjørn & Aven, Terje, 2015. "Adaptive risk management using new risk perspectives – an example from the oil and gas industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 75-82.
    13. Aven, Terje, 2013. "A conceptual framework for linking risk and the elements of the data–information–knowledge–wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 30-36.
    14. Jongseok Seo & Lidziya Lysiankova & Young-Seok Ock & Dongphil Chun, 2017. "Priorities of Coworking Space Operation Based on Comparison of the Hosts and Users’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    15. Leena Suopajärvi & Karin Beland Lindahl & Toni Eerola & Gregory Poelzer, 2023. "Social aspects of business risk in the mineral industry—political, reputational, and local acceptability risks facing mineral exploration and mining," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(2), pages 321-331, June.
    16. Eisuke Watanabe & Ryuichi Shibasaki, 2023. "Extraction of Bunkering Services from Automatic Identification System Data and Their International Comparisons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Kastner, Marvin & Kämmerling, Nicolas & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Equipment selection and layout planning - Literature overview and research directions," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 485-519, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    18. Guoqiang Shen & Long Zhou & Yao Wu & Zhiming Cai, 2018. "A Global Expected Risk Analysis of Fatalities, Injuries, and Damages by Natural Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Natalia Vladimirovna Gryzunova & Victoria Ivanovna Pyatanova & Viktoriya Valeryevna Manuylenko & Konstantin Vasilievich Ordov, 2019. "Models of credit limit-setting for companies as means of encouraging competitiveness," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 615-625, September.
    20. Anqi Ma & Yu Liu & Xiujuan Xu & Tao Dong, 2021. "A deep-learning based citation count prediction model with paper metadata semantic features," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6803-6823, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8035-:d:596810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.