IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v15y2013i4p416-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Rosa Pires da Cruz

    (Management and Economics Department and NECE Research Unit, University of Beira Interior, Pólo IV – Edifício Ernesto Cruz, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal. E-mails: piresdacruz@gmail.com; jjmf@ubi.pt; sazevedo@ubi.pt)

  • João J Ferreira

    (Management and Economics Department and NECE Research Unit, University of Beira Interior, Pólo IV – Edifício Ernesto Cruz, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal. E-mails: piresdacruz@gmail.com; jjmf@ubi.pt; sazevedo@ubi.pt)

  • Susana Garrido Azevedo

    (Management and Economics Department and NECE Research Unit, University of Beira Interior, Pólo IV – Edifício Ernesto Cruz, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal. E-mails: piresdacruz@gmail.com; jjmf@ubi.pt; sazevedo@ubi.pt)

Abstract

In their decisions, seaport stakeholders internalize various factors that intervene in seaport competitiveness. The literature emphasizes that such seaport characteristics are important in the stakeholder choice of seaports. Given today’s competitive environment, it becomes imperative that seaport managers develop the ability to determine which factors stakeholders perceive as critical. This research aims to empirically study the key factors of seaport competitiveness from the perspective of Iberian seaports stakeholders by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model. The Delphi approach is deployed for the preliminary factor selection stages in an AHP context. Our initial results demonstrate that seaport users and seaport service providers differ in their understanding of the key factors of seaport competitiveness. From the seaport authorities and terminal operators’ perspective, seaport facilities and equipment is the most important factor followed by channel depth, intermodal links, vessel turnaround time and proximity to import/export areas. Vessel turnaround time is considered by ocean carriers as the most influential factor to competitiveness, followed by intermodal links, seaport facilities and equipment, proximity to import/export areas and channel depth.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Rosa Pires da Cruz & João J Ferreira & Susana Garrido Azevedo, 2013. "Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(4), pages 416-443, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:416-443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v15/n4/pdf/mel201314a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v15/n4/full/mel201314a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vega, Laura & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2019. "Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 132-148.
    2. Peng, Peng & Yang, Yu & Lu, Feng & Cheng, Shifen & Mou, Naixia & Yang, Ren, 2018. "Modelling the competitiveness of the ports along the Maritime Silk Road with big data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 852-867.
    3. Ayman Nagi & Meike Schroeder & Wolfgang Kersten, 2021. "Risk Management in Seaports: A Community Analysis at the Port of Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Kammoun, Rabeb & Abdennadher, Chokri, 2022. "Seaport efficiency and competitiveness in European seaports," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-124.
    5. Maria D. Gracia & Rosa G. González-Ramírez & Luis M. Ascencio & Julio Mar-Ortiz, 2022. "Assessing the implementation of governance best practices by Latin American ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(4), pages 806-834, December.
    6. Yap, Wei Yim & Hsieh, Cheng-Hsien & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2023. "Shipping connectivity data analytics: Implications for maritime policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 112-127.
    7. Luo, Meifeng & Chen, Fuying & Zhang, Jiantong, 2022. "Relationships among port competition, cooperation and competitiveness: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Maciel M. Queiroz & André Bergsten Mendes, 2020. "Critical Success Factors of the Brazilian Offshore Support Vessel Industry: A Flexible Systems Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 33-48, June.
    9. Xue Li & Kum Fai Yuen, 2022. "Autonomous ships: A study of critical success factors," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 228-254, June.
    10. Julián Martínez Moya & María Feo Valero, 2017. "Port choice in container market: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 300-321, May.
    11. Balci, Gökcay & Cetin, Ismail Bilge & Esmer, Soner, 2018. "An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 294-304.
    12. Hokey Min & Byung-In Park, 2020. "A two-dimensional approach to assessing the impact of port selection factors on port competitiveness using the Kano model," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 353-382, September.
    13. Jongseok Seo & Lidziya Lysiankova & Young-Seok Ock & Dongphil Chun, 2017. "Priorities of Coworking Space Operation Based on Comparison of the Hosts and Users’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    14. Tseng, Po-Hsing & Pilcher, Nick, 2019. "Evaluating the key factors of green port policies in Taiwan through quantitative and qualitative approaches," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 127-137.
    15. B. Adenso-Díaz & N. García Álvarez & J. A. Lago Alba, 2020. "A fuzzy AHP classification of container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 218-238, June.
    16. Javier Cantillo & Víctor Cantillo-García & Víctor Cantillo & Julián Arellana, 2023. "Port choice using aggregate open data: an application to Colombian port zones," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 520-548, September.
    17. Mohammed Abdul-Rahman & Wale Alade & Shahnawaz Anwer, 2023. "A Composite Resilience Index (CRI) for Developing Resilience and Sustainability in University Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    18. Dimitrios Georgoulas & Ioannis Koliousis & Stratos Papadimitriou, 2023. "An AHP enabled port selection multi-source decision support system and validation: insights from the ENIRISST project," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. S. Vijayakumar Bharathi, 2017. "Prioritizing and Ranking the Big Data Information Security Risk Spectrum," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(3), pages 183-201, September.
    20. Felipe Lobo Umbelino Souza & Cira Souza Pitombo & Dong Yang, 2021. "Port choice in Brazil: a qualitative research related to in-depth interviews," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:416-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.